Abstract
Freshwater resources deliver a broad set of ecosystem services essential for human health and well-being, food and energy production, social and economic stability, and for protecting and maintaining ecosystems. The ever increasing demand of water resources often result in substantial declines in the provision of ecosystem services. The management of human and environmental water needs is therefore challenging and calls for an integrative view on ecosystem services. A shift of current water management objectives is required to ensure water security for current and future generations. This article analyzes water governance and management systems (WGMS) and highlights characteristics assumed to be crucial for adaptive and integrated management: (i) institutional settings, (ii) actor networks, and (iii) multi-level structures. To understand complex WGMS one has to link these characteristics to management performances including impacts on ecosystem services. We applied this approach to the Sandveld in South Africa focusing on actor networks and the management of ecosystem services. We indicate that a basic re-thinking of water management objectives at national and regional level according to groundwater sustainability took place. A bottom-up movement in the Sandveld developed approaches to protect and sustain groundwater resources. Nevertheless, cooperation between actors and sectors from different levels is weak which in turn provides a huge barrier for the integration of ecosystem services into groundwater policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A distinction is made by Pahl-Wostl (2009) between resources management and governance. ‘Resources management’ refers to the activities of analyzing and monitoring, developing and implementing measures to keep the state of a resource within desirable bounds. The notion of ‘resource governance’ takes into account the different actors and networks that help formulate and implement environmental policy and/or policy instruments. Governance sets the rules under which management operates.
- 2.
Coordinating twinning partnerships towards more adaptive governance in river basins supported by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme (2009–2011).
References
Bakker K, Kooy M, Shofiania NE, Martijn EJ (2008) Governance failure: rethinking the institutional dimensions of urban water supply to poor households. World Dev 36(10):1891–1915
Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC
Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1–11
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Biswas AK, Tortajada C (2010) Future water governance: problems and perspectives. Water Resour Dev 26(2):129–139
Braune E (2000) Towards comprehensive groundwater resource management in South Africa. IAH Congress 2000, Cape Town
Braune E, Xu Y (2008) Groundwater management issues in southern Africa—an IWRM perspective. Water SA 34(6):699–706
Conrad J, Nel J, Wentzel J (2005) The challenges and implications of assessing groundwater recharge: A case study—northern Sandveld, Western Cape, South Africa. Water SA 30(5):75–81
Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services—societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island, Washington
de Groot RS, Wilson MA et al (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) South Africa (2005) Olifants/Doorn water management area: Internal Strategic Perspective. Prepared by Ninham Shand (Pty) Ltd in association with Jakoet and Associates, Umvoto Africa, FST and Tlou and Matji, on behalf of the Directorate: National Water Resource Planning. DWAF Report No P WMA 17/000/00/0305
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473
Franke AC, Steyn JM, Ranger KS, Haverkort AJ (2011) Developing environmental principles, criteria, indicators and norms for potato production in South Africa through field surveys and modeling. Agric Syst 104(4):297–306
Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337
Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Grin J (2010) Climate change adaptation in European river basins. Reg Environ Change 10(4):263–284
Irwin F, Ranganathan J (2008) Action agenda for sustaining ecosystem services. In: Ranganathan J, Munasinghe M, Irwin F (eds) Policies for sustainable governance of global ecosystem services. Washington, pp 21–69
Knieper C, Kastens B, Holtz G, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Analysing water governance in heterogeneous case studies—experiences with a database approach. Environ Sci Policy 13(7):592–603
Knüppe K, Pahl-Wostl C (2011) Requirements for adaptive governance of groundwater ecosys-tem services—Insights from Sandveld (South Africa), Upper Guadiana (Spain) and Spree (Germany). Reg Environ Change 13(1):53–66
Krysanova V, Dickens C, Timmerman J, Varela-Ortega C et al (2010) Cross-comparison of cli-mate change adaptation strategies across large river basins in Europe, Africa and Asia. Water Resour Manage 24(14):4121–4160
Loring AP, Chapin FS, Gerlach SC (2008) The services-oriented architecture: ecosystem services as a framework for diagnosing change in social ecological systems. Ecosystems 11(3):478–489
MA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment] (2005) Introduction and conceptual framework. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington
Münch Z, Conrad C (2007) Remote sensing and GIS based determination of groundwater dependent ecosystems in the Western Cape, South Africa. Hydrogeol J 15(1):19–28
Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emery and environmental decision making. John Wiley, New York
Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond Panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15181–15187
Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19(3):354–365
Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P, Aerts J, Berkamp G, Cross K (2007) Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol Soc 12(2):30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art30/
Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Kastens B, Knieper C (2010) Analysing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Policy 13(7):571–581
Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to amstering complexity: towards adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Policy 23:24–34
Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem services bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. PNAS USA 107(11):5242–5247
Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance. TEC Background Paper, Stockholm, Global Water Partnership
Rodríguez JP, Beard TD, Bennett EM et al. (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11(1):28. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/
Schlüter M, Leslie H, Levin S (2009) Managing water-use trade-offs in a semi-arid river delta to sustain multiple ecosystem services: a modeling approach. Ecol Res 24(3):491–503
UNEP [United Nations Environment Programme] (2007) Global environment outlook: environment for development (GEO 4). Progress Press, Valletta
van Jaarsveld AS, Biggs R, Scholes RJ et al (2005) Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philos Trans Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 360:425–441
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knüppe, K., Pahl-Wostl, C. (2014). Water Governance and Management Systems and the Role of Ecosystem Services: Case Study Insights—Groundwater Management in the Sandveld Region, South Africa. In: Bhaduri, A., Bogardi, J., Leentvaar, J., Marx, S. (eds) The Global Water System in the Anthropocene. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07548-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07548-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07547-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07548-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)