Smartphones, Smart Seniors, But Not-So-Smart Apps: A Heuristic Evaluation of Fitness Apps

  • Paula Alexandra Silva
  • Kelly Holden
  • Aska Nii
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8534)


This paper reports on the results of a heuristic evaluation of Nike+ and RunKeeper, two of the most popular health and fitness mobile apps found in both Google Play and the iTunes stores for Android and iOS platforms respectively. Given the potential benefit of practicing physical exercise in living a healthier and longer life, this study aimed at understanding whether or not these apps are ready to accommodate the needs of older adult users. The study concludes that the inspected apps are not ready to accommodate older adults needs. Small target sizes, insufficient contrast and reduced font sizes, are some of the common violations found in the user interfaces; these are also impeditive of the use of the apps by this target user population. It is thus necessary to highlight these issues in order to eliminate the barrier of access to these apps by this population by also encouraging careful observation of design guidelines.


Older adults gamification health and fitness heuristics heuristic evaluation active aging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S Preventive Services Task Force: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore, MD, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Merz, C.N., Forrester, J.S.: The Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease. Am. J. Med. 102, 573–580 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Falls among older adults: an overview,
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization: Active Aging: A Policy Framework (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Nielsen Newswire: Mobile Majority: U.S. Smartphone Ownership Tops 60%,
  8. 8.
    Administration on Aging Department of Health and Human Services: A Profile of Older Americans: 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W3C: Web Accessibility for Older Users: A Literature Review, W3C Working Draft (May 14 , 2008),
  10. 10.
    Ilyas, M.: A Study of Web Accessibility Barriers for Older Adults, and Heuristics Evaluation of Email Websites Based on Web Accessibility Heuristics for Older Adults by AARP. J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inf. Sci. 3, 806–813 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., de Ruyter, B.: Developing an Adaptive Memory Game for Seniors. In: Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Rowland, D. (eds.) Fun and Games 2008. LNCS, vol. 5294, pp. 170–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sousa, L., Figueiredo, D., Cerqueira, M.: Envelhecer em família. Ambar, Porto (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bierman, A., Statland, D.: Timing, Social Support, and the Effects of Physical Limitations on Psychological Distress in Late Life. Journals Gerontol. Ser. B, Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 65, 631–639 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (create). Psychol. Aging. 21, 333–352 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chisnell, D.E., Redish, J.C.G., Lee, A.M.Y.: New Heuristics for Understanding Older Adults as Web Users. Tech. Commun. 53, 39–59 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Institute of Ageing: Making Your Website Senior Friendly,
  17. 17.
    Kurniawan, S., Zaphiris, P.: Research-derived Web Design Guidelines for Older People. In: Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 129–135. ACM Press, Baltimore (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leitao, R., Silva, P.A.: Target and Spacing Sizes for Smartphone User Interfaces for Older Adults: Design Patterns Based on an Evaluation with Users. In: Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, pp. 19–21 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leitao, R., Silva, P.: A Study of Novice Older Adults and Gestural Interaction on Smartphones. In: 3rd Workshop on Mobile Accessibility, HCI 2013, Paris, France (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jin, Z.X., Plocher, T., Kiff, L.: Touch Screen User Interfaces for Older Adults: Button Size and Spacing. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 933–941. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ma, X., Yan, B., Chen, G., Zhang, C., Huang, K., Drury, J., Wang, L.: Design and Implementation of a Toolkit for Usability Testing of Mobile Apps. Mob. Networks Appl. 18, 81–97 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calak, P.: Smartphone Evaluation Heuristics for Older Adults (2013),
  23. 23.
    Kalachea, A., Kickbusch, I.: A Global Strategy for Healthy Ageing. World Health 4, 4–5 (1997)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics: Consumer Expenditure Survey (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Irving, P., Chatterjee, A.: The Longevity Economy: From The Elderly, A New Source Of Economic Growth (2013),
  27. 27.
    Silva, P.A., Nunes, F., Vasconcelos, A., Kerwin, M., Moutinho, R., Teixeira, P.: Using the Smartphone Accelerometer to Monitor Fall Risk while Playing a Game: The Design and Usability Evaluation of Dance! Don’t Fall. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds.) AC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8027, pp. 754–763. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Carvalho, R.N.S., Ishitani, L.: Motivational Factors for Mobile Serious Games for Elderly Users. In: SBC-Proceedings of SBGames 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brox, E., Luque, L.: Exergames for Elderly: Social Exergames to Persuade Seniors to Increase Physical Activity. In: 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops, pp. 546–549. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aarhus, R., Grönvall, E., Larsen, S.B., Wollsen, S.: Turning Training into Play: Embodied Gaming, Seniors, Physical Training and Motivation. Gerontechnology 10, 110–120 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilson, C.: User Interface Inspection Methods: A User-Centered Design Method. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Waltham (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alan, D., Finlay, J.E., Abdowd, G.D., Beale, R.: Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, England (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256. ACM, Seattle (1990)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Greenberg, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Gutwin, C., Kaplan, S.: Adapting the Locales Framework for Heuristic Evaluation of Groupware. In: The Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia, OZCHI (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nielsen, J.: 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design,
  38. 38.
    Lazich, R.S. (ed.): Top Operating Systems for Smartphones Worldwide, 2012 and 2016. Market Share Reporter (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nielsen, J.: How to Conduct a Heuristic Evaluation,

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Alexandra Silva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kelly Holden
    • 1
  • Aska Nii
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computer SciencesUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluHawaii
  2. 2.DETI/IEETAUniversidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations