Advertisement

Using Learner Data to Influence Performance during Adaptive Tutoring Experiences

  • Robert A. Sottilare
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8534)

Abstract

During computer-based tutoring sessions, Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) adapt planning and manage real-time instructional decisions. The link between learner data and enhanced performance is the adaptive tutoring learning effect chain through which learner data informs learner state classification which in turn informs optimal instructional decisions to enhance performance. This paper examines the roles and influence of learner data in both short-term (also called run-time or session) and long-term (also called persistent) learner models used to support adaptive tutoring decisions within the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT). To enhance the usability of tutoring systems and learner performance, recommendations for the design of future learner models are also presented.

Keywords

adaptive tutoring learner modeling Intelligent Tutoring Systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sottilare, R.A.: Considerations in the Development of an Ontology for a Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring. In: Proceedings of the International Defense and Homeland Security Simulation Workshop 2012, Vienna, Austria (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fletcher, J.D., Sottilare, R.: Shared Mental Models and Intelligent Tutoring for Teams. In: Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., Holden, H. (eds.) Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Volume 1 - Learner Modeling. Army Research Laboratory (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sottilare, R., Ragusa, C., Hoffman, M., Goldberg, B.: Characterizing an adaptive tutoring learning effect chain for individual and team tutoring. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training Simulation & Education Conference, Orlando, Florida (December 2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nye, B., Sottilare, R., Ragusa, C., Hoffman, M.: Prologue - Defining Instructional Challenges, Strategies, and Tactics for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., Goldberg, B. (eds.) Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Volume 2 - Instructional Management. Army Research Laboratory (in press, 2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sottilare, R.A., Brawner, K.W., Goldberg, B.S., Holden, H.K.: The Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT). U.S. Army Research Laboratory – Human Research & Engineering Directorate (ARL-HRED), Orlando (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holden, H., Sinatra, A.: The Need for Empirical Evaluation of Learner Model Elements. In: Sottilare, R., Graesser, A., Hu, X., Holden, H. (eds.) Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Volume 1 - Learner Modeling. Army Research Laboratory (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braithwaite, V.A., Law, H.G.: Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(1), 250 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jung, C.G.: Psychological Types. Collected Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 6. Princeton University Press (1971) ISBN 0-691-097704Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myers, I.B., Myers, P.B.: Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type. Davies-Black Publishing, Mountain View (1995) ISBN 0-89106-074-XGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Felder, R., Spurlin, J.: Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles. TEMPUS Publications, UK (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tomlinson, C.A., et al.: Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 27, 119–145 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sottilare, R., Proctor, M.: Passively classifying student mood and performance within intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). Educational Technology Journal & Society 15(2), 104–114 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brawner, K.W.: Modeling Learner Mood in Realtime Through Bisensors for Intelligent Tutoring Improvements. University of Central Florida (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Sottilare
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Army Research LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations