Advertisement

Two Steps Back for One Step Forward: Revisiting Augmented Cognition Principles from a Perspective of (Social) System Theory

  • Sven Fuchs
  • Jessica Schwarz
  • Frank O. Flemisch
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8534)

Abstract

One decade after the Augmented Cognition concept validation experiments, the field may have passed the hype phases of inflated expectations and disillusionment but seems to have lost traction before reaching the maturity necessary for broad acceptance and widespread application. The authors suggest that the engineering-driven approach to the field’s challenges may have been necessary in the beginning but should be complemented by looking into implications from the social sciences. The goal of this paper is to raise awareness for the field of (social) system theory by taking two steps back: One to revisit the foundational concepts of AugCog from an alternative perspective, another to illustrate the relevance and importance of social systems principles to the AugCog field. We outline practical implications that (social) system theory holds for the design of adaptation management and conclude our review by suggesting that an approach to human-system cooperation may be able to address the challenges.

Keywords

adaptive systems adaptation management augmented cognition cooperative human-machine systems human-systems integration systems engineering system theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barker, R.A., Edwards, R.E.: The Boeing Team Fundamentals of Augmented Cognition. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Augmented Cognition International) (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitlow, S.D., Ververs, P.M., Buchwald, B., Pratt, J.: Scheduling Communications with an Adaptive System Driven by Real-Time Assessment of Cognitive State. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Augmented Cognition International) (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones, D., Hale, K., Dechmerowski, S.: Creating Adaptive Emotional Experience During VE Training. Proceedings of I/ITSEC 2012, 1–10 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dong, Y., Hu, Z., Uchimura, K., Murayama, N.: Driver inattention monitoring system for intelligent vehicles: A review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 12(2), 596–614 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gartner Inc. (n.d.). Hype Cycles, http://www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp (retrieved February 28, 2014)
  6. 6.
    Licklider, J.C.R.: Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-1(1), 4–11 (1960)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kruse, A.A., Schmorrow, D.D.: Session Overview: Foundations of Augmented Cognition. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Augmented Cognition International) (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmorrow, D., Stanney, K.M., Wilson, G., Young, P.: Augmented cognition in human- system interaction. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3rd edn., pp. 1364–1384. Wiley, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banks, S.B., Lizza, C.S.: Pilot’s Associate: a cooperative, knowledge-based system application. IEEE Expert 6(3), 18–29 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flemisch, F.O., Onken, R.: The Search for Pilot’s Ideal Complement, Experimental Results with the Crew Assistant Military Aircraft CAMA, HCI International, Munich (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmorrow, D., McBride, D.: Introduction. Special issue on Augmented Cognition. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17(2), 127–130 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scerbo, M.W.: Adaptive automation. In: Karwowski, W. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, pp. 1077–1079. Taylor and Francis, London (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson, G.F., Schlegel, R.E. (eds.): Operator Functional State Assessment, NATO RTO Publication RTO-TR-HFM-104. NATO Research and Technology Organization. Neuilly sur Seine, France (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation. Human Factors 37(2), 381–394 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forsythe, C.: Context Modeling for Augmented Cognition. In: Foundations of Augmented Cognition, pp. 546–547. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belyavin, A., Ryder, C.: Context modeling as an aid to the management of operator state. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Augmented Cognition International) (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fuchs, S., Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M., Berka, C., Levendowski, D., Juhnke, J.: Physiological Sensors Cannot Effectively Drive System Mitigation Alone. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Stanney, K.M., Reeves, L.M. (eds.) Foundations of Augmented Cognition, 2nd edn., pp. 193–200. Strategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuchs, S., Hale, K.S., Berka, C., Juhnke, J.: A mitigation framework for enhancing situation awareness. In: Stanney, K.M., Schmorrow, D.D. (eds.) Augmented Cognition: A Practitioner’s Guide. HFES, Santa Monica (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fuchs, S., Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M., Juhnke, J., Schmorrow, D.D.: Enhancing Mitigation in Augmented Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Engineering & Decision Making 1(3), 309–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Veltman, H.J.A., Jansen, C.: The adaptive operator. In: Vincenzi, D.A., Mouloua, M., Hancock, P.A. (eds.) Human Performance, Situation Awareness, and Automation: Current Research and Trends, vol. II, pp. 7–10. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sciarini, L.W., Nicholson, D.: Assessing cognitive state with multiple physiological measures: A modular approach. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Estabrooke, I.V., Grootjen, M. (eds.) FAC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5638, pp. 533–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feigh, K.M., Dorneich, M.C., Hayes, C.C.: Toward a Characterization of Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Researchers and System Designers. Human Factors 54(6), 1008–1024 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rammert, W., Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Technik und Handeln – Wenn soziales Handeln sich auf menschliches Verhalten und technische Abläufe verteilt. In: Rammert, W., Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (eds.) Können Maschinen handeln? Soziologische Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Mensch und Technik, Campus, Frankfurt/M (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bertalanffy, L.: General System Theory – Foundations, Development, Applications. Braziller, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simmel, G.: Philosophie des Geldes. Verlag von Duncker & Humbolt, Leipzig (1900)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luhmann, N.: Ökologische Kommunikation. Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (1986)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arciszewski, H.F.R., Greef, T.E., de, D.J.H.: van: Adaptive Automation in a Naval Combat Management System. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 39(6), 1188–1199 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parsons, T.: The social system. Free Press, Glencoe (1951)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parsons, T.: The structure of social action. Free Press, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dahrendorf, R.G.: Gesellschaft und Freiheit. Zur soziologischen Analyse der Gegenwart. Piper, Munich (1961)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Luhmann, N.: Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M (1984)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Flemisch, F., Schindler, J., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., Damböck, D.: Some Bridging Methods towards a Balanced Design of Human-Machine Systems. In: Applied Ergonomics International Conference, Las Vegas, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Willke, H.: Komplexität als Formprinzip. In: Baecker, D. (ed.) Schlüsselwerke der Systemtheorie, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ashby, W.R.: Requisite Variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1, 83–99 (1958)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pask, G.: An approach to cybernetics. Harper & Brothers, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Flemisch, F., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., Bruder, R.: Towards a Cooperative Guidance and Control of Highly Automated Vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire; Ergonomics Special Issue, Beyond Human Centered Automation (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Fuchs
    • 1
  • Jessica Schwarz
    • 1
  • Frank O. Flemisch
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer FKIEWachtbergGermany
  2. 2.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations