Skip to main content

A Paradox by Another Name Is Good Estimation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 89))

Abstract

This chapter describes the property of estimates of points in a multidimensional space that is labeled by some as paradoxical, shows when this property of the estimates is present, and also shows that the paradoxical result is not flaw in estimation because estimates improve with additional information even when the paradox occurs. The paradox is that when a correct response to a test item is added to the string of responses for an examinee to previous items, at least one of the coordinates of the new estimated θ-point decreases compared to the estimate based on the initial string of responses. The information presented in the chapter shows that this can occur whenever the likelihood function for the estimates has a particular form. This form is present in many cases when the item responses for a test can not be described by simple structure. Results are presented to show that the additional response improves the estimate of the θ-point even though the paradoxical result occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Finkelman M, Hooker G, Wang J (2010) Prevalence and magnitude of paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. J Educ Behav Stat 35:744–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flexner SB, Hauck LC (eds) (1987) The Random House dictionary of the English language, 2, unabridgedth edn. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker G (2010) On separable tests, correlated priors, and paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika 75:694–707

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker G, Finkelman M (2010) Paradoxical results and item bundles. Psychometrika 75:249–271

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker G, Finkelman M, Schwartzman A (2009) Paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika 74:419–442

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan P, Spiess M (2012) Generalizations of paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika 77:127–152

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reckase M (2009) Multidimensional item response theory. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden WJ (2012) On compensation in multidimensional response modeling. Psychometrika 77:21–30

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van Rijn PW, Rijmen F (2012) A note on explaining away and paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory (Research Report RR-12-13). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Reckase .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reckase, M.D., Luo, X. (2015). A Paradox by Another Name Is Good Estimation. In: Millsap, R., Bolt, D., van der Ark, L., Wang, WC. (eds) Quantitative Psychology Research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 89. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07503-7_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics