Abstract
This chapter describes the property of estimates of points in a multidimensional space that is labeled by some as paradoxical, shows when this property of the estimates is present, and also shows that the paradoxical result is not flaw in estimation because estimates improve with additional information even when the paradox occurs. The paradox is that when a correct response to a test item is added to the string of responses for an examinee to previous items, at least one of the coordinates of the new estimated θ-point decreases compared to the estimate based on the initial string of responses. The information presented in the chapter shows that this can occur whenever the likelihood function for the estimates has a particular form. This form is present in many cases when the item responses for a test can not be described by simple structure. Results are presented to show that the additional response improves the estimate of the θ-point even though the paradoxical result occurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Finkelman M, Hooker G, Wang J (2010) Prevalence and magnitude of paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. J Educ Behav Stat 35:744–761
Flexner SB, Hauck LC (eds) (1987) The Random House dictionary of the English language, 2, unabridgedth edn. Random House, New York
Hooker G (2010) On separable tests, correlated priors, and paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika 75:694–707
Hooker G, Finkelman M (2010) Paradoxical results and item bundles. Psychometrika 75:249–271
Hooker G, Finkelman M, Schwartzman A (2009) Paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika 74:419–442
Jordan P, Spiess M (2012) Generalizations of paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika 77:127–152
Reckase M (2009) Multidimensional item response theory. Springer, New York
Van der Linden WJ (2012) On compensation in multidimensional response modeling. Psychometrika 77:21–30
van Rijn PW, Rijmen F (2012) A note on explaining away and paradoxical results in multidimensional item response theory (Research Report RR-12-13). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reckase, M.D., Luo, X. (2015). A Paradox by Another Name Is Good Estimation. In: Millsap, R., Bolt, D., van der Ark, L., Wang, WC. (eds) Quantitative Psychology Research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 89. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07503-7_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07503-7_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07502-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07503-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)