Skip to main content

Computational Issues in the Stochastic Discount Factor Framework for Equity Risk Premium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nonlinear Economic Dynamics and Financial Modelling
  • 1396 Accesses

Abstract

The Stochastic Discount Factor (SDF) methodology is a general and convenient framework for asset pricing. SDF encapsulates all the modeling uncertainties and its advantage is that we do not require the knowledge of investors’ preferences. Suitable specification of SDF is, therefore, critical. It has been based on single or multiple factors and also on observable factors as well as latent factors. The variables required to proxy for the factors may be both macroeconomic as well as behavioral. In this article we show how we can incorporate such variables for empirical implementation of equity risk premium with daily frequency. Practical issues crop up to define the dependence between the asset return and the SDF. Here we show how copula can be used in this context and solve some of the analytical complexities for software implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, A. B. (2002). An exploration of the effects of pessimism and doubt on asset returns. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26, 1075–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, K. H., & Karolyi, G. A. (1994). Good news. Bad News and International Spillovers of Stock Return Volatility Between Japan and the US, Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 2, 405–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., Shleifer, N., & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 307–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2005). A survey of behavioral finance. In R. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (Vol. II). New Jersey: Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., & Wu, G. (2000). Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. Review of Financial Studies, 13, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, J. B., Green, R. C., & Naik, V. (1999). Optimal investment. Growth Options, and Security Returns, The Journal of Finance, 54, 1553–1607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., & Kuttner, K. (2005). What explains the stock market’s reaction to federal reserve policy? The Journal of Finance, 60, 1221–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, G. G., Martikainen, T., & Tse, Y. (1997). Price and volatility spillovers in Scandinavi an stock markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, 811–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buono, M. J. (1989). The relationship between the variability of inflation and stock return: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Financial Research, 12, 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., & Hentschel, L. (1992). No news is good news: An asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 281–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, B., & Caporale, T. (2003). Investigating the effects of monetary regime shifts: The case of the federal reserve and the shrinking risk premium. Economic Letters, 80, 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., (2008). Predicting the Bear Stock Market: Macroeconomic Variables as Leading Indicators, National Taiwan University—Department of Economics, Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernov, M., Gallant, R., Ghysels, E., & Tauchen, G. (2003). Alternative models for stock price dynamics. Journal of Econometrics, 116, 225–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chordia, T., & Shivakumar, L. (2002). Momentum, business cycle, and time-varying expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 985–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. H. (2005). Asset pricing. USA: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard, J., & Kaul, G. (1998). An anatomy of trading strategies. Review of Financial Studies, 11, 489–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craine, R. & Martin, V. (2003). Monetary Policy Shocks and Security Market Responses, University of California, Berkeley Economics Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I., & Priestley, T. (2009). Time-varying risk premia and the output gap. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(7), 2801–2833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under and overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53, 1839–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrani, T. S., & Zeng, X. (2007). Copulas for bivariate probability distributions. Economics Letters, 43(4), 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W. N., & Massa, M. (2002). Daily momentum and contrarian behavior of index fund investors. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (1999). A unified theory of underreaction. Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets, The Journal of Finance, 54, 2143–2184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizys, R. & Spencer, P. (2007). Assessing the Relation between Equity Risk Premium and Macroeconomic Volatilities in the UK. Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 13, UK: University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutmos, G., & Booth, G. G. (1995). Asymmetric volatility transmission in international stock markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 14, 747–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koijen, R. S. J., Rodriguez, J. C., & Sbuelz, A. (2008). Momentum Return and Mean-Reversion in Strategic Asset Allocation, Working Paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. (2010). Copulas of bivariate rayleigh and log-normal distributions. Electronics Letters, 46, 1669–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. S., & Zhang, S. (2005). The volatility risk premium embedded in currency options. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59, 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena, J. I., & Rodriguez, R. (2006). On the economic link between asset prices and real activity. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34(5–6), 889–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigobon, R., & Sack, B. (2003). Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 639–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, G. W. (1989). Why does stock market volatility change over time? Journal of Finance, 44, 1115–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, H. (2005). A behavioral approach to asset pricing. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, H. (2008). Risk and return in behavioral SDF-based asset pricing models. Journal of Investment Management, 6(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., & Wickens, M. (2002). Asset pricing with observable stochastic discount factors. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(3), 397–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, S. R. (2002). Analysis of financial time series. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, H. (2010). Is noise trading cancelled out by aggregation? Management Science, 56, 1047–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2008). Equity Risk Premium and Volatility: A Correlation Structure, Dalhousie University—School of Business Administration, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramaprasad Bhar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Bivariate Log-Normal Copula

Appendix A: Bivariate Log-Normal Copula

The intrinsic relations between bivariate distributions and their marginal distributions can be clearly characterised by copulas. The bivariate log-normal distributions play important roles in areas other than being described here. In this appendix, log-normal copula is derived. These formulas are in terms of the Gaussian Q-function, being supported by MATLAB. Thus the copula evaluation process can be expedited both analytically and numerically.

The bivariate log-normal probability density function for a pair of random variables \(X\) and \(Y\), is given by (A.3), where \((x,y)\) are transformed from bivariate normal distribution variables \((x',y')\) as:

$$\begin{aligned} x=A \exp (mx'), \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)
$$\begin{aligned} y=B \exp (ny'). \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

With \(\rho \) as correlation between \((x',y')\) and \((x>0, y>0, A>0, B>0)\):

$$\begin{aligned} f_{x,y}(x,y)&=\frac{1}{2mn\pi \sigma _X\sigma _Yxy\sqrt{1-\rho ^2}}\times \exp \bigg \{\frac{-1}{2(1-\rho ^2)}\bigg [\Big (\frac{\ln (x/A)-m\mu _X}{m\sigma _X}\Big )^2 \\&\quad -2\rho \Big (\frac{\ln (x/A)-m\mu _X}{m\sigma _X}\Big )\Big (\frac{\ln (y/B)-n\mu _Y}{n\sigma _Y}\Big )+\Big (\frac{\ln (y/B)-n\mu _Y}{n\sigma _Y}\Big )^2\bigg ]\bigg \} \end{aligned}$$
(A.3)

Referring to (A.1) and (A.2), \(x\) and \(y\) are log-normal variables. With respect to the SDF formulation, we may consider \(x\) as the SDF and \(y\) as the gross return as discussed in Sect. 3. In this formulation, \(x'\) may be represented as a function of observable determinants and similarly for \(y'\). The additional parameters \((A,m,B,n)\) in (A.1) and (A.2) are used to make these transformations as general as possible.

The marginal PDFs associated with (A.3) take the following forms:

$$\begin{aligned} f_X(x)=\frac{1}{mx\sigma _X\sqrt{2\pi }}\exp \bigg [-\frac{1}{2}\bigg (\frac{\ln (x/A)-m\mu _X}{m\sigma _X}\bigg )^2\bigg ], \end{aligned}$$
(A.4)
$$\begin{aligned} f_Y(y)=\frac{1}{my\sigma _Y\sqrt{2\pi }}\exp \bigg [-\frac{1}{2}\bigg (\frac{\ln (y/B)-n\mu _Y}{n\sigma _Y}\bigg )^2\bigg ]. \end{aligned}$$
(A.5)

The corresponding marginal distributions are:

$$\begin{aligned} F_X(x)=1-Q\bigg (\frac{\ln (x/A)-m\mu _X}{m\sigma _X}\bigg ), \end{aligned}$$
(A.6)
$$\begin{aligned} F_Y(y)=1-Q\bigg (\frac{\ln (y/B)-n\mu _Y}{n\sigma _Y}\bigg ). \end{aligned}$$
(A.7)

Here, \(Q(\cdot )\) is referred to as the Gaussian Q-function with the following definition:

$$\begin{aligned} Q(z)=\frac{1}{2\pi }\int \limits ^\infty _z \exp \Big (-\frac{t^2}{2}\Big )dt. \end{aligned}$$
(A.8)

With change of variable, the Gaussian Q-function may be written as (over finite interval):

$$\begin{aligned} Q(z)=\frac{1}{\pi }\int \limits ^{\pi /2}_z \exp \Big (-\frac{z^2}{2\sin ^2\theta }\Big )d\theta . \end{aligned}$$
(A.9)

here \(Q(\cdot )\) is computable using MATLAB built in function. For specific values of \(m (=2)\) and \(n (=2)\) the elements of the covariance matrix for the pair of random variables \(X\) and \(Y\) are given below:

$$\begin{aligned} \mathrm{var}(X)=A^2\exp (4\mu _X)\exp (4\sigma ^2_X)[\exp (4\sigma ^2_X)-1], \end{aligned}$$
(A.10)
$$\begin{aligned} \mathrm{var}(Y)=B^2\exp (4\mu _Y)\exp (4\sigma ^2_Y)[\exp (4\sigma ^2_Y)-1], \end{aligned}$$
(A.11)
$$\begin{aligned} \mathrm{cov}(X,Y)=AB\exp (2\mu _X+2\mu _Y)\exp (2\sigma ^2_X+2\sigma ^2_Y)[\exp (4\rho \sigma _X\sigma _Y)-1]. \end{aligned}$$
(A.12)

From (A.6) and (A.7) we can write:

$$\begin{aligned} x=F^{-1}_X(u)=A\exp [m\mu _X+m\sigma _XQ^{-1}(1-u)]:= a_1, \end{aligned}$$
(A.13)
$$\begin{aligned} y=F^{-1}_Y(w)=B\exp [n\mu _Y+n\sigma _YQ^{-1}(1-w)]:= a_2, \end{aligned}$$
(A.14)

where \(Q^{-1}(\cdot )\) is the inverse Gaussian Q-function and this is available as a built-in function in MATLAB. Now, we are in a position to write the bivariate log-normal copula distribution function as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} C(u,w)=F_{XY}[F^{-1}_X(u),F^{-1}_Y(w)]=F_{XY}(a_1,a_2)=\int \limits ^{a_1}_0\int \limits ^{a_2}_0f_{X,Y}(x,y)dydx. \end{aligned}$$
(A.15)

The simplification of the double integral in (A.15) is at the core issue in empirical implementation. The quantity \(f_{X,Y}(x,y)\) is given by Eq. (A.3) and Liu (2010) shows how to convert this to a single integral which can be readily implemented in MATLAB. In this appendix we just quote the final expression for the copula distribution function.

$$\begin{aligned} C_{u,w}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi }}\int \limits ^{Q^{-1}(1-u)}_{-x}\exp \Big (-\frac{r^2}{2}\Big )Q\Big (\frac{\rho r-Q^{-1}(1-w)}{\sqrt{1-\rho ^2}}\Big )dr \end{aligned}$$
(A.16)
$$\begin{aligned} (0<u<1,0<w<1). \end{aligned}$$

Liu (2010) suggests further avenue to reduce computational burden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhar, R., Malliaris, A.G. (2014). Computational Issues in the Stochastic Discount Factor Framework for Equity Risk Premium. In: Dieci, R., He, XZ., Hommes, C. (eds) Nonlinear Economic Dynamics and Financial Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07470-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics