Abstract
The Stochastic Discount Factor (SDF) methodology is a general and convenient framework for asset pricing. SDF encapsulates all the modeling uncertainties and its advantage is that we do not require the knowledge of investors’ preferences. Suitable specification of SDF is, therefore, critical. It has been based on single or multiple factors and also on observable factors as well as latent factors. The variables required to proxy for the factors may be both macroeconomic as well as behavioral. In this article we show how we can incorporate such variables for empirical implementation of equity risk premium with daily frequency. Practical issues crop up to define the dependence between the asset return and the SDF. Here we show how copula can be used in this context and solve some of the analytical complexities for software implementation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abel, A. B. (2002). An exploration of the effects of pessimism and doubt on asset returns. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26, 1075–1092.
Bae, K. H., & Karolyi, G. A. (1994). Good news. Bad News and International Spillovers of Stock Return Volatility Between Japan and the US, Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 2, 405–438.
Barberis, N., Shleifer, N., & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 307–345.
Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2005). A survey of behavioral finance. In R. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (Vol. II). New Jersey: Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Bekaert, G., & Wu, G. (2000). Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. Review of Financial Studies, 13, 1–42.
Berk, J. B., Green, R. C., & Naik, V. (1999). Optimal investment. Growth Options, and Security Returns, The Journal of Finance, 54, 1553–1607.
Bernanke, B., & Kuttner, K. (2005). What explains the stock market’s reaction to federal reserve policy? The Journal of Finance, 60, 1221–1257.
Booth, G. G., Martikainen, T., & Tse, Y. (1997). Price and volatility spillovers in Scandinavi an stock markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, 811–823.
Buono, M. J. (1989). The relationship between the variability of inflation and stock return: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Financial Research, 12, 329–339.
Campbell, J. Y., & Hentschel, L. (1992). No news is good news: An asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 281–318.
Caporale, B., & Caporale, T. (2003). Investigating the effects of monetary regime shifts: The case of the federal reserve and the shrinking risk premium. Economic Letters, 80, 87–91.
Chen, S., (2008). Predicting the Bear Stock Market: Macroeconomic Variables as Leading Indicators, National Taiwan University—Department of Economics, Working Paper Series.
Chernov, M., Gallant, R., Ghysels, E., & Tauchen, G. (2003). Alternative models for stock price dynamics. Journal of Econometrics, 116, 225–257.
Chordia, T., & Shivakumar, L. (2002). Momentum, business cycle, and time-varying expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 985–1019.
Cochrane, J. H. (2005). Asset pricing. USA: Princeton University Press.
Conard, J., & Kaul, G. (1998). An anatomy of trading strategies. Review of Financial Studies, 11, 489–519.
Craine, R. & Martin, V. (2003). Monetary Policy Shocks and Security Market Responses, University of California, Berkeley Economics Working Paper.
Cooper, I., & Priestley, T. (2009). Time-varying risk premia and the output gap. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(7), 2801–2833.
Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under and overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53, 1839–1885.
Durrani, T. S., & Zeng, X. (2007). Copulas for bivariate probability distributions. Economics Letters, 43(4), 248–249.
Goetzmann, W. N., & Massa, M. (2002). Daily momentum and contrarian behavior of index fund investors. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 375–389.
Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (1999). A unified theory of underreaction. Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets, The Journal of Finance, 54, 2143–2184.
Kizys, R. & Spencer, P. (2007). Assessing the Relation between Equity Risk Premium and Macroeconomic Volatilities in the UK. Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 13, UK: University of York.
Koutmos, G., & Booth, G. G. (1995). Asymmetric volatility transmission in international stock markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 14, 747–762.
Koijen, R. S. J., Rodriguez, J. C., & Sbuelz, A. (2008). Momentum Return and Mean-Reversion in Strategic Asset Allocation, Working Paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, May.
Liu, X. (2010). Copulas of bivariate rayleigh and log-normal distributions. Electronics Letters, 46, 1669–1671.
Low, B. S., & Zhang, S. (2005). The volatility risk premium embedded in currency options. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, 803–832.
Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59, 347–370.
Pena, J. I., & Rodriguez, R. (2006). On the economic link between asset prices and real activity. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34(5–6), 889–916.
Rigobon, R., & Sack, B. (2003). Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 639–669.
Schwert, G. W. (1989). Why does stock market volatility change over time? Journal of Finance, 44, 1115–1153.
Shefrin, H. (2005). A behavioral approach to asset pricing. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press.
Shefrin, H. (2008). Risk and return in behavioral SDF-based asset pricing models. Journal of Investment Management, 6(3), 1–18.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 35–55.
Smith, P., & Wickens, M. (2002). Asset pricing with observable stochastic discount factors. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(3), 397–446.
Tsay, S. R. (2002). Analysis of financial time series. New York: Wiley.
Yan, H. (2010). Is noise trading cancelled out by aggregation? Management Science, 56, 1047–1059.
Zhao, Y. (2008). Equity Risk Premium and Volatility: A Correlation Structure, Dalhousie University—School of Business Administration, Working Paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: Bivariate Log-Normal Copula
Appendix A: Bivariate Log-Normal Copula
The intrinsic relations between bivariate distributions and their marginal distributions can be clearly characterised by copulas. The bivariate log-normal distributions play important roles in areas other than being described here. In this appendix, log-normal copula is derived. These formulas are in terms of the Gaussian Q-function, being supported by MATLAB. Thus the copula evaluation process can be expedited both analytically and numerically.
The bivariate log-normal probability density function for a pair of random variables \(X\) and \(Y\), is given by (A.3), where \((x,y)\) are transformed from bivariate normal distribution variables \((x',y')\) as:
With \(\rho \) as correlation between \((x',y')\) and \((x>0, y>0, A>0, B>0)\):
Referring to (A.1) and (A.2), \(x\) and \(y\) are log-normal variables. With respect to the SDF formulation, we may consider \(x\) as the SDF and \(y\) as the gross return as discussed in Sect. 3. In this formulation, \(x'\) may be represented as a function of observable determinants and similarly for \(y'\). The additional parameters \((A,m,B,n)\) in (A.1) and (A.2) are used to make these transformations as general as possible.
The marginal PDFs associated with (A.3) take the following forms:
The corresponding marginal distributions are:
Here, \(Q(\cdot )\) is referred to as the Gaussian Q-function with the following definition:
With change of variable, the Gaussian Q-function may be written as (over finite interval):
here \(Q(\cdot )\) is computable using MATLAB built in function. For specific values of \(m (=2)\) and \(n (=2)\) the elements of the covariance matrix for the pair of random variables \(X\) and \(Y\) are given below:
From (A.6) and (A.7) we can write:
where \(Q^{-1}(\cdot )\) is the inverse Gaussian Q-function and this is available as a built-in function in MATLAB. Now, we are in a position to write the bivariate log-normal copula distribution function as follows:
The simplification of the double integral in (A.15) is at the core issue in empirical implementation. The quantity \(f_{X,Y}(x,y)\) is given by Eq. (A.3) and Liu (2010) shows how to convert this to a single integral which can be readily implemented in MATLAB. In this appendix we just quote the final expression for the copula distribution function.
Liu (2010) suggests further avenue to reduce computational burden.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhar, R., Malliaris, A.G. (2014). Computational Issues in the Stochastic Discount Factor Framework for Equity Risk Premium. In: Dieci, R., He, XZ., Hommes, C. (eds) Nonlinear Economic Dynamics and Financial Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07470-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07470-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07469-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07470-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)