Bridging the Gap between Students and Laboratory Experiments

  • Max Hoffmann
  • Katharina Schuster
  • Daniel Schilberg
  • Sabina Jeschke
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8526)


After having finished studies, graduates need to apply their knowledge to a new environment. In order to professionally prepare students for new situations, virtual reality (VR) simulators can be utilized. During our research, such a simulator is applied in order to enable the visit of remote laboratories, which are designed through advanced computer graphics in order to create simulated representations of real world environments. That way, it is our aim to facilitate the access to practical engineering laboratories.

Our goal is to enable a secure visit of elusive or dangerous places for students of technical studies. The first step towards the virtualization of engineering environments, e.g. a nuclear power plant, consists in the development of demonstrators. In the present paper, we describe the elaboration of an industry relevant demonstrator for the advanced teaching of engineering students. Within our approach, we use a virtual reality simulator that is called the “Virtual Theatre”.


Virtual Reality Virtual Theatre Remote Laboratories Immersion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kerres, M.: Mediendidaktik. Konzeption und Entwicklung mediengestützer Lernangebote. München (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Handke, J., Schäfer, A.M.: E-Learning, E-Teaching and E-Assessment in der Hochschullehre. Eine Anleitung, München (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig, R.J., Amernic, J.H.: PowerPoint Presentation Technology and the Dynamics of Teaching. Innovative Higher Education 31(3), 147–160 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Szabo, A., Hastings, N.: Using IT in the undergraduate classroom. Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computer and Education 35 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Köhler, T., Kahnwald, N., Reitmaier, M.: Lehren und Lernen mit Multimedia und Internet. In: Batinic, B., Appel, M. (Hrsg.), Medienpsychologie, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bartsch, R.A., Cobern, K.M.: Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentation in lectures. Computer and Education 41, 77–86 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Creed, T.: PowerPoint, No! Cyberspace, Yes. The Nat. Teach. & Learn. F. 6(4) (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cyphert, D.: The problems of PowerPoint. Visual aid or visual rhetoric? Business Communication Quarterly 67, 80–83 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norvig, P.: PowerPoint: Shot with its own bullets. The Lancet 362, 343–344 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simons, T.: Does PowerPoint make you stupid? Presentations 18(3) (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, A.M.: The use and abuse of PowerPoint in teaching and learning in the life sciences: A personal view. In: BEE-j 2 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    André, E.: Was ist eigentlich Multimodale Mensch-Technik Interaktion? Anpassungen an den Faktor Mensch. In: Forschung und Lehre 21(01/2014) (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steffen, M., May, D., Deuse, J.: The Industrial Engineering Laboratory. Problem Based Learning in Industrial Eng. Education at TU Dortmund University. In: EDUCON (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace, Cambridge (Mass.) (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schuster, K., Ewert, D., Johansson, D., Bach, U., Vossen, R., Jeschke, S.: Verbesserung der Lernerfahrung durch die Integration des Virtual Theatres in die Ingenieurausbildung. In: Tekkaya, A. E.; Jeschke, S.; Petermann, M.; May, D.; Friese, N.; Ernst, C.; Lenz, S.; Müller, K.; Schuster, K (Hrsg.). TeachING-LearnING.EU discussions. Aachen (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoffmann, M., Schuster, K., Schilberg, D., Jeschke, S.: Next-Generation Teaching and Learning using the Virtual Theatre. In: 4th Global Conference on Experiential Learning in Virtual Worlds (in print), Prague, Czech Republic (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolf, M.J.P., Perron, B.: The video game theory reader, NY, London (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D.J., DeFanti, T.A.: Surround-Screen Projection-based Virtual Reality. The Design and Implementation of the CAVE. In: SIGGRAPH 1993 Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 135–142. ACM, New York (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Max, N.: SIGGRAPH 1984 Call for Omnimax Films. Computer Graphics 16(4), 208–214 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Codella, C., Jalili, R., Koved, L., Lewis, B., Ling, D.T., Lipscomb, J.S., Rabenhorst, D., Wang, C.P., Norton, A., Sweeny, P., Turk, G.: Interactive simulation in a multi-person virtual world. In: ACM - Human Fact. in Comp. Syst. CHI 1992 Conf., pp. 329–334 (1992)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Deering, M.: High Resolution Virtual Reality. Com. Graph. 26(2), 195–201 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McDowall, I.E., Bolas, M., Pieper, S., Fisher, S.S., Humphries, J.: Implementation and Integration of a Counterbalanced CRT-based Stereoscopic Display for Interactive View-point Control in Virtual Environment Applications. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 1256(16) (1990)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ellis, S.R.: What are virtual environments? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 14(1), 17–22 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D.J., DeFanti, T.A., Kenyon, R.V., Hart, J.C.: The CAVE: Audio Visual Experience Automatic Virtual Environment. Communications of the ACM 35(6), 64–72 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plato: The Republic. Athens (375 B.C.)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rheingold, H.: Virtual reality. New York (1991)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nowke, C., Schmidt, M., van Albada, S.J., Eppler, J.M., Bakker, R., Diesrnann, M., Hentschel, B., Kuhlen, T.: VisNEST – Interactive analysis of neural activity data. In: 2013 IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization (BioVis), pp. 65–72 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pick, S., Wefers, F., Hentschel, B., Kuhlen, T.: Virtual air traffic system simulation – Aiding the communication of air traffic effects. In: 2013 IEEE on Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 133–134 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pick, S., Hentschel, B., Wolter, M., Tedjo-Palczynski, I., Kuhlen, T.: Automated Position-ing of Annotations in Immersive Virtual Environments. In: Proc. of the Joint Virtual Reality Conference of EuroVR - EGVE - VEC, pp. 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bishop, G., Fuchs, H., et al.: Rsearch Directions in Virtual Environments. Computer Graphics 26(3), 153–177 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Johansson, D.: Convergence in Mixed Reality-Virtuality Environments: Facilitating Natural User Behavio, Schweden (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Ewert, D., Schuster, K., Johansson, D., Schilberg, D., Jeschke, S.: Intensifying learner’s experience by incorporating the virtual theatre into engineering education. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fisher, S.: The AMES Virtual Environment Workstation (VIEW). In: SIGGRAPH 1989 Course #29 Notes (1989)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Teitel, M.A.: The Eyephone: A Head-Mounted Stereo Display. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 1256(20), pp. 168–171 (1990)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Blender, (last checked: January 27, 2014)
  39. 39.
    WorldViz, (last checked: January 27, 2014)
  40. 40.
    Google, (last checked: January 27, 2014)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Hoffmann
    • 1
  • Katharina Schuster
    • 1
  • Daniel Schilberg
    • 1
  • Sabina Jeschke
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Information Management in Mechanical Engineering, Center for Knowledge ManagementRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations