Advertisement

Increasing the Transparency of Unmanned Systems: Applications of Ecological Interface Design

  • Ryan Kilgore
  • Martin Voshell
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8526)

Abstract

This paper describes ongoing efforts to address the challenges of supervising teams of heterogeneous unmanned vehicles through the use of demonstrated Ecological Interface Design (EID) principles. We first review the EID framework and discuss how we have applied it to the unmanned systems domain. Then, drawing from specific interface examples, we present several generalizable design strategies for improved supervisory control displays. We discuss how ecological display techniques can be used to increase the transparency and observability of highly automated unmanned systems by enabling operators to efficiently perceive and reason about automated support outcomes and purposefully direct system behavior.

Keywords

Ecological Interface Design (EID) automation transparency unmanned systems supervisory control displays 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D.: How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors 37(1), 5–19 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.: Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 39(2), 230–253 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kilgore, R.M., Harper, K.A., Nehme, C., Cummings, M.L.: Mission planning and monitoring for heterogeneous unmanned vehicle teams: A human-centered perspective. In: AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace Conference in Sonoma, CA (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nehme, C.E., Kilgore, R.M., Cummings, M.L.: Predicting the impact of heterogeneity on unmanned-vehicle team performance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 52(13). SAGE Publications (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vicente, K.J., Rasmussen, J.: The ecology of human-machine systems II: Mediating ‘direct perception’ in complex work domains. Ecological Psychology 2, 207–250 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burns, C.M., Hajdukiewicz, J.: Ecological interface design. CRC Press (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dzindolet, M.T., Peterson, S.A., Pomranky, R.A., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P.: The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. of Human-Compt. Studies 58(6), 697–718 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. CRC Press (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Itoh, J., Sakuma, A., Monta, K.: An ecological interface for supervisory control of BWR nuclear power plants. Control Engineering Practice 3(2), 231–239 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jamieson, G.A., Vicente, K.J.: Ecological interface design for petrochemical applications: Supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, and distributed, collaborative work. Computers & Chemical Engineering 25(7), 1055–1074 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watson, M., Russell, W.J.: Sanderson, P.: Anesthesia monitoring, alarm proliferation, and ecological interface design. Australian J. of Info. Systms 7(2), 109–114 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall, D.S., Shattuck, L.G., Bennett, K.B.: Evaluation of an Ecological Interface Design for Military Command and Control. J. of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 6(2), 165–193 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Linegang, M.P., Stoner, H.A., Patterson, M.J., Seppelt, B.D., Hoffman, J.D., Crittendon, Z.B., Lee, J.D.: Human-automation collaboration in dynamic mission planning: A challenge requiring an ecological approach. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50(23), pp. 2482–2486 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Furukawa, H.: An ecological interface design approach to human supervision of a robot team. In: Autonomous Robots and Agents, pp. 163–170. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson, J.J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Routledge (1986)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reising, D.V.C., Sanderson, P.M.: Designing displays under ecological interface design: Towards operationalizing semantic mapping. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 42(3), pp. 372–376. SAGE Publications (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kilgore, R., St-Cyr, O.: The SRK inventory: A tool for structuring and capturing a worker competencies analysis. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50(3), pp. 506–509. SAGE Publications (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rasmussen, J.: The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2), 234–243 (1985)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Department of Defense: MIL-STD-2525C: Common Warfighting Symbology (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bisantz, A.M., Pfautz, J., Stone, R., Roth, E.M., Thomas-Meyers, G., Fouse, A.: Assessment of Display Attributes for Displaying Meta-information on Maps. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50(3), pp. 289–293 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan Kilgore
    • 1
  • Martin Voshell
    • 1
  1. 1.Charles River Analytics, Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations