Comparing Data from a Computer Based Intervention Program for Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Agisilaos Chaldogeridis
  • Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos
  • Moses Gialaouzidis
  • Magdalini Tsolaki
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8526)


Nowadays, dealing with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) includes a combination of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical treatment. But, current drugs do not, and potential future drugs might not, improve quality of life. Evidence suggests psychosocial interventions, like educational and arts programs, do in fact have such a benefit. Supportive and enriching information technology may be more important than biotechnology (Whitehouse, 2013). So non-pharmaceutical treatment including physical and mental exercising as well seem to perform better. There are many forms of mental exercising from simple crosswords puzzles to sophisticated video games that exercise different cognitive skills. Main object of this report is to present the results of a computer-based intervention program for people with AD that take place in two Day Care Centers of Greek Association of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders in Thessaloniki, Greece. There is a significant amount of data that include patients, who have taken part in interventions programs since 2009. For the purpose of this study we included data for a period of one year only. These patients have been tested before and after each intervention program (pre-test and post-test). Our work was to compare these data to examine how the program performs and which cognitive skills seem to have better improvement. The results showed that patients’ overall scores were preserved for this period of time and had a slightly improvement which is a promising result indicating that this intervention program has positive effects.


computerized cognitive training Alzheimer’s disease cognitive rehabilitation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ball, K., Berch, D.B., Helmers, K.F., et al.: Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized controlled trial (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnes, et al.: Computer-Based Cognitive Training for Mild-Cognitive Impairment: Results from a Pilot Randomized, Controlled trial. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 23(3), 205–210 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayles, K.A., Boone, D.R., Kaszniak, A.W., Stem, L.Z.: Language impairment in dementia. Arizona Medicine 39(5), 308–311 (1982)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christodoulakis, T., Petsanis, K.: Cognitive rehabilitation in the early stages of Alzheimer’s Disease (2010), (retrieved at December 6, 2013)
  5. 5.
    Cipriani, G., Bianchetti, A., Trabucchi, M.: Outcomes of a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program on Alzheimer’s disease patients compared with those on patients affected by mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 43(3), 327–335 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emery, V.O.B.: Language impairment in dementia of the Alzheimer type: A hierarchical decline? International Journal of Psychiatry 30(2), 145–164 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gates, J.N., Sachdev, S.P., Fiatarone Singh, A.M., Valenzuela, M.: Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review (2011), (retrieved at December 6, 2013)
  8. 8.
    Gunther, V.K., Schafer, P., Holzner, B.J., Kemmler, G.W.: Long-term Improvements in Cognitive Performance through Computer-assisted Cognitive Training: A Pilot Study in a Residential Home for Older People. Aging and Mental Health 7(3), 200–206 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutton, J.T.: Alzheimer’s disease. In: Rakel, R.E. (ed.) Conn’s Current Therapy, pp. 778–781. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kosmidis, M.H., Bozikas, V.P., Vlahou, C.H., Kiosseoglou, G., Giaglis, G., Karavatos, A.: Verbal fluency in institutionalized patients with schizophrenia: Age-related performance decline. Psychiatry Research 134(3), 233–240 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kounti, F., Tsolaki, M., Kiosseoglou, G.: Functional cognitive assessment scale (FUCAS): A new scale to assess executive cognitive function in daily life activities in patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 21(5), 305–311 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Linda, C., Woods, B.: Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malegiannaki, A.: Investigation of the relationship between the performance in experimental projects and aspects of meta-attention. M.Sc., Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mentenopoulos, G.: Aphasias, agnosias, inactivities and their association with memory, pp. 21,39. University Studio Press (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sitzer, D.I., Twamley, E.W., Jeste, D.V.: Cognitive training in Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006 114, 75–90 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, et al.: A Cognitive Training Program Designed Based on Principles of Brain Plasticity: Results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsantali, E.: Cognitive Rehabilitation in the first stages of Alzheimer’s disease through verbal tasks, PhD in School of Psychology of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsolaki, M., Fountoulakis, C., Chantzi, E., Kazis, A.: The Cambridge cognitive examination for the elderly: A validation study in demented patients from the elderly Greek population. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 15, 269–278 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valenzuela, M.: How Mental Exercise and Cognitive Training can modify Brain Reserve and so Reduce Dementia Risk. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales (2008), (retrieved at December 6, 2013 )
  20. 20.
    Whitehouse, P.: The end of Alzheimer’s disease – from biochemical pharmacology to ecopsychosociology: A personal perspective. Biochemical Pharmacology (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Willis, L.S., Tennstedt, S.L., Marsiske, M., Ball, K., Elias, J., Koepke, K.M., Morris, J.N., Rebok, G.W., Unverzagt, F.W., Stoddard, A.M., Wright, E.: Long-term Effects of Cognitive Training on Everyday Functional Outcomes in Older Adults (2006), (retrieved at December 6, 2013)
  22. 22.
    Wilson, B.A., Cockburn, J., Baddeley, A., Hiorns, R.: The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test: Supplement Two. Thames Valley Test Co., Reading (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agisilaos Chaldogeridis
    • 1
  • Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos
    • 1
  • Moses Gialaouzidis
    • 2
  • Magdalini Tsolaki
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Greek Association of Alzheimer Disease and Relative DisordersThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Medical SchoolAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations