Advertisement

Touching the Past: Haptic Augmented Reality for Museum Artefacts

  • Mariza Dima
  • Linda Hurcombe
  • Mark Wright
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8526)

Abstract

In this paper we propose a novel interaction technique that creates the illusion of tactile exploration of museum artefacts which are otherwise impossible to touch. The technique meets the contextual necessity, often requested by museum curators, to background technology and to direct the focus of the museum visitor’s experience to the artefact itself. Our approach relies on the combination of haptic interaction and the adaptation of a well-known illusion that enables museum visitors to make sense of the actual physical non-touchable artefact in an embodied way, using their sensory and motor skills. We call this technique Haptic Augmented Reality.

Keywords

Museum haptics touch authenticity haptic augmented reality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bergamasco, M., Frisoli, A., Barbagli, F.: Haptics technologies and cultural heritage applications. In: Proceedings of Computer Animation, pp. 25–32 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergamasco, M., Avizzano, C., Di Pietro, G., Barbagli, F., Frisoli, A.: The museum of pure form: System architecture. In: Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 112–117 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bimber, O., Fröhlich, B., Schmalstieg, D., Encarnação, L.M.: The Virtual Showcase. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 21(6), 48–55 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botvinick, C.J.: Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that the eyes see. Nature 391, 756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brewster, S.A.: The impact of haptic ‘touching’ technology on cultural applications. In: Digital Applications for Cultural Heritage Institutions, pp. 273–284 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chatterjee, C., Helen, J. (eds.): Touch in Museums: policy and practice in object handling. Berg, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark, A.: Being There: Putting brain, body and world together again. MIT Press (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Contreras, F., Farjas, M., Melero, F.J.: Fusion of Cultures. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Oxford. BAR International Series 2494 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dima, M., Arvind, D.K., Lee, J., Wright, M.: Haptically extended augmented prototyping. In: Proceedings of 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 169–170 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dudley, S. (ed.): Museum Materialities: Objects, Engagements and Materialities. Routledge, London (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Figueroa, P., Coral, M., Boulanger, P., Borda, J., Londono, E., Vega, F., Prieto, F., Restrepo, D.: Multi-modal exploration of small artifacts: An exhibition at the Gold Museum in Bogota. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Froese, T., McGann, M., Bigge, W., Spiers, A., Seth, A.K.: The enactive torch: A new tool for the science of perception. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 5(4), 365–375 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gibson, E., Penfold-Ward, J., Tasker, S., Williamson, J., Wood, C.: Senses in touch II. University of Glasgow, Third-year project report (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gosden, C., Phillips, R., Edwards, E. (eds.): Sensible Objects: Colonialism, Museums and Material Culture. Berg, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hurcombe, L.: A sense of materials and sensory perception in concepts of materiality. World Archaeology 39, 532–545 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hurcombe, L.: Archaeological Artefacts as material Culture. Routledge, London (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hurcombe, L., Sheridan, A., Summers, I., Wright, M., Dima, M., Philpott, M.: Touching the Past (in preparation)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jang, J.S., Jung, G.S., Lee, T.H., Jung, S.K.: Two phase calibration for a mirror metaphor augmented reality system. In: Proccedings of IEEEE, vol. 102(2) (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lazzari, M., McLaughlin, M.L., Jaskowiak, J., Wong, W., Akbarian, M.: A Haptic Exhibition of Daguerreotype Cases for USCs Fisher Gallery. Prentice Hall (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthew, B., Cohen, J.: Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McLaughlin, M.L., Sukhatme, G., Hespanha, J., Shahabi, C., Ortega, A., Medioni, G.: The haptic museum. In: Proceedings of the EVA 2000 Conference on Electronic Imaging and the Visual Arts, Florence, Italy (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noe, A.: Action in perception. MIT Press (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Patterson, M.: The Senses of Touch. Berg, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pye, E. (ed.): The Power of Touch: Handling objects in museums and heritage contexts Left Coast Press (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varela, F.: The Embodied Mind. MIT Press (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariza Dima
    • 1
  • Linda Hurcombe
    • 2
  • Mark Wright
    • 3
  1. 1.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.University of ExeterExeterUK
  3. 3.Liverpool John Moore UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations