Advertisement

Abstract

Learners learn differently. Research shows that learners learn best when the learning experience is personalized to individual needs. Open Education Resource (OER) platforms potentially provide an ideal learning environment to meet the diverse needs of learners, including learners with disabilities. Unfortunately accessibility was not a consideration when OER were initially designed or developed. When the FLOE (Flexible Learning for Open Education) Project was asked to address the accessibility of OER, rather than a traditional approach to accessibility with a single set of fixed criteria, FLOE set out to support the OER community in providing a personalized and fully integrated approach to accessible learning. This approach advances the strengths and values of open education and also encourages pedagogical and technical innovation. While ensuring the resources are accessible to diverse learners, including learners with disabilities, the approach also supports content portability, ease of updating, internationalization and localization, content reuse and repurposing, and more efficient and effective content discovery.

Keywords

Accessibility inclusive design open education personalization open education resources 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pearson Personalized Learning: The Nexus of 21st Century Learning and Educational Technologies Pearson Issue Papers, pp. 1–12 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rose, D.H., Meyer, A.E.D.: Teaching every student in the Digital Age: universal design for learning 2002. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Solomon, G., Allen, N., Resta, P.E.: Toward digital equity: bridging the divide in education. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    United Nations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml (cited February 18, 2014)
  5. 5.
    Rush, S.: Unpublished Report commissioned by the William and flora Hewlett Foundation, Knowbility (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    President’s Commisssion in Special Education. Final report to the President ( May 23, 2011), http://www.dys-add.com/resources/SpecialEd/PresidentialCommission.pdf (cited February 18, 2014 )
  7. 7.
    Atkins, D.E., Brown, J.S., Hammond, A.L.: A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities, p. 84 (February 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Treviranus, J., Roberts, V.: Inclusive E-learning. In: Weiss, J., Nolan, J., Trifonas, P. (eds.) The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments, pp. 469–497. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson, T.: A Response and Commentary to: A Review of e-Learning in Canada. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie 32(3), 1499–6685 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Treviranus, J., Roberts, V.: Disability, Special Education and IT. In: Voogt, J.M., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, Springer, Hamburg (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hewlett Grantees Meeting (April 2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jutta Treviranus
    • 1
  • Jess Mitchell
    • 1
  • Colin Clark
    • 1
  • Vera Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Inclusive Design Research CentreOCAD UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations