Skip to main content

Contextualized Institutions in Virtual Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 702 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8386))

Abstract

Within a virtual organization, more than one institution might be involved in the regulation of actors’ behavior. Each institution specifies a set of norms covering a specific aspect of the problem domain with a governance scope defining its remit. Together, they govern the participants and reflect the objectives of the organization. With actors’ behavior being simultaneously regulated by more than one institution, normative conflicts can appear. In this paper, we formalize the notion of governance scope and propose a computational approach to identify weak and strong norm conflicts in virtual organizations. This is achieved by explicitly modeling the governance scopes of institutions through context models. We illustrate our approach by means of a case study concerning food security in international trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    EU, NL and TE refer to the three institutions in the case study: EU being European Union, NL the Netherlands and TE the terminal and warehouse.

References

  1. http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/

  2. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: An architecture of a normative system. In: AAMAS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cliffe, O., De Vos, M., Padget, J.: Specifying and reasoning about multiple institutions. In: COIN (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corapi, D., Russo, A., Vos, M.D., Padget, J.A., Satoh, K.: Normative design using inductive learning. TPLP 11(4–5), 783–799 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Elhag, A., Breuker, J., Brouwer, P.: On the formal analysis of normative conflicts. Inf. Commun. Technol. Law 9(3), 207–217 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.-A.: An algorithm for conflict resolution in regulated compound activities. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 193–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Gener. Comput. 9, 365–386 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giunchiglia, F., Bouquet, P.: Introduction to contextual reasoning. An artificial intelligence perspective. In: Kokinov, B. (ed.) Perspectives on Cognitive Science. NBU Press, Sofia (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kollingbaum, M., Norman, T., Preece, A., Sleeman, D.: Norm refinement: informing the re-negotiation of contracts. In: COIN@ECAI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, T., Balke, T., De Vos, M., Padget, J., Satoh. K.: A model-based approach to the automatic revision of secondary legislation. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL’13, pp. 202–206. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Leary, D.E., Kuokka, D., Plant, R.: Artificial intelligence and virtual organizations. Commun. ACM 40(1), 52–59 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ostrom, E.: Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Searle, J.: The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, M.P.: Commitments in multiagent systems: some history, some confusions, some controversies, some prospects. The Goals of Cognition. College Publications, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M., Norman, T.: Resolving conflict and inconsistency in norm-regulated virtual organizations. In: AAMAS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M., Norman, T.: Normative conflict resolution in multi-agent systems. JAAMAS 19(2), 124–152 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zimmermann, A., Lorenz, A., Oppermann, R.: An operational definition of context. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds.) CONTEXT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4635, pp. 558–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tingting Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, T., Jiang, J., Aldewereld, H., De Vos, M., Dignum, V., Padget, J. (2014). Contextualized Institutions in Virtual Organizations. In: Balke, T., Dignum, F., van Riemsdijk, M., Chopra, A. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX. COIN 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8386. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07313-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07314-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics