Skip to main content

Modelling the Effects of Personality and Temperament in Small Teams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX (COIN 2013)

Abstract

We present an investigation into the effects that player personality can have on team performance in games that have been designed to have a social purpose (“serious games”), such as games intended to enhance more consideration for the environment and for sustainable energy usage. The work involves multi-agent-based model of team play, where individual player personalities are characterized by Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), which specifies personality according to several psychological categories. This includes a fuzzy-logic-based MBTI parameterization of player personality. Experiments employing agent-based simulation are then presented that show the effects of various combinations of personality and temperament types on team performance in the context of competing team profiles. Modelling of this nature can generally be used by policy makers in connection with the recruitment of project teams that are likely to work together more effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cohen, S.G.: What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Manage. 23(3), 239–290 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campion, M.A., Papper, E.M., Medsker, G.J.: Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Pers. Psychol. 49(2), 429–452 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. LePine, J.A., Buckman, B.R., Crawford, E.R., Methot, J.R.: A review of research on personality in teams: accounting for pathways spanning levels of theory and analysis. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 21(4), 311–330 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J.: Individual-level predictors of task-related teamwork processes: the role of expertise and self-efficacy in team meetings. Gr. Organ. Manag. 34(1), 37–66 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kozlowski, S., Bell, B.: Work Groups and Teams in Organizations (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agneessens, F., Everett, M.G., Zhu, M., Huang, Y., Contractor, N.S.: Motivations for self-assembling into project teams. Soc. Netw. 35(2), 251–264 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reeves, B., et al.: Leadership in Games and at Work: Implications for the Enterprise of Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games. Palo Alto, CA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jung, C.G.: Psychological Types: or the Psychology of Individuation. Harcourt, Brace, New York (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myers, I.: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto (1962)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Myers, I.B., McCaulley, M.H.: Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., Odessa (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keirsey, D.: Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character Intelligence, p. 350. Prometheus Nemesis, Del Mar (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neuman, G.A., Wagner, S.H., Christiansen, N.D.: The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Gr. Organ. Manag. 24(1), 28–45 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herden, R., Lyles, M.: Individual attributes and the problem conceptualization process. In: Human Systems Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 275–284. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Driskell, J.E., Hogan, R., Salas, E.: Personality and group performance. In: Hendrick, C. (ed.) Group Processes and Intergroup Relations: Review of Personality and Social Psychology, pp. 91–112. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Driskell, J.E., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., O’Shea, P.G.: What makes a good team player? personality and team effectiveness. Gr. Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 10(4), 249–271 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Culp, G., Smith, A.: Understanding psychological type to improve project team performance. J. Manag. Eng. 17(1), 24–33 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bradley, J.H., Hebert, F.J.: The effect of personality type on team performance. J. Manag. Dev. 16(5), 337–353 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: THE big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 44(1), 1–26 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bowers, C.A., Pharmer, J.A., Salas, E.: When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: a meta-analysis. Small Gr. Res. 31(3), 305–327 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mansoor, H.S., Ali, H., Ali, N., Ali, H.: Cognitive diversity and team performance : a review. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 3(6), 9–13 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammed, S., Angell, L.C.: Personality heterogeneity in teams: which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Gr. Res. 34(6), 651–677 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. SMC-15(1), 116–132 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mamdani, E.H.: Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 121(12), 1585 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Farhangian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Farhangian, M., Purvis, M.K., Purvis, M., Savarimuthu, B.T.R. (2014). Modelling the Effects of Personality and Temperament in Small Teams. In: Balke, T., Dignum, F., van Riemsdijk, M., Chopra, A. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX. COIN 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8386. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07313-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07314-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics