Skip to main content

Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Flexible Framework for Determination of Suitable Criteria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

Abstract

Green supplier selection (GSS) criteria arise from an organization inclination to respond to any existing trends in environmental issues related to business management and processes, so GSS is integrating environmental thinking into conventional supplier selection. This research is designed to determine prevalent general and environmental supplier selection criteria and develop a framework which can help decision makers to determine and prioritize suitable green supplier selection criteria (general and environmental). In this research we considered several parameters (evaluation objectives) to establish suitable criteria for GSS such as their production type, requirements, policy and objectives instead of applying common criteria. At first a comprehensive and deep review on prevalent and green supplier selection literatures performed. Then several evaluation objectives defined to assess the green supplier selection criteria include: frequency, compatibility, quantifiable, easy to understand and assessment. By developed framework suitable criteria can be selected using multi attribute decision making methods. The main contribution of this research is developing a framework to help managers for creating their green supplier criteria list.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amindoust A et al (2012) Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference. Appl Soft Comput 12:1668–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arikan F (2013) An interactive solution approach for multiple objective supplier selection problem with fuzzy parameters. J Intell Manuf. doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0782-6

  • Awasthi A et al (2010) A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 126:370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadnia AH et al (2012) Sustainable supplier selection based on self-organizing mapneural network and multi criteria decision making. In: international congress on interdisciplinary business and social science 2012 (ICIBSoS 2012). Procedia Soc Behav Sci (65): 879–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Sarkis J (2010) Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J Clean Prod 18:1200–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala A et al (2008) Experiences with greening suppliers. The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. J Clean Prod 16(15):1610–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boosothonsatit K et al (2012) A generic simulation model for green supplier selection. In: Leveraging technology for a sustainable world: proceedings of the 19th CIRP 23–35 May, pp 587–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Borade AB, Banson SV (2007) Domain of supply chain management-a state of art. J Technol Manage Innov 12:109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyukozkan G, Cifci G (2011) A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput Ind 62:164–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyukozkan G, Cifci G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39:3000–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Cifci G (2010) Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: a fuzzy ANP approach. Prod Plann Control iFirst 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai J et al (2013) Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst Appl 40:3872–3885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang B et al (2011) Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):1850–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CC et al (2010) Implementation of green supply chain management in uncertainty. In: IEEE international conference on IEEM 7–10 Dec, pp 260–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y-J (2011) Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Inf Sci 181:1651–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheraghi SH et al (2004) Critical success factors for supplier selection: an update. J Appl Bus Res 20(2):91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou CY et al (2008) Comparative investigation on green supplier selection of the American, Japanese and Taiwanese electronics industry in China. In: IEEE international conference on IE&EM 8–11 Dec, pp 1909–1914

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou TY et al (2011) The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp Res Part E 47: 822–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson GW (1966) An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions. J Purchasing 2(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornfeld DA (2013) Green manufacturing: fundamentals and applications. pp 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyziogelu O, Büyüközkan G (2010) Evaluation of green suppliers considering decision criteria dependencies. In: Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems 1, 634. Multiple criteria decision making for sustainable energy and transportation systems, part 2: pp 145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K et al (2013). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Clean Prod XXX: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisi RM et al (2010). Supplier performance evaluation for green supply chain management. Bus Perform Meas Manage Part 4: 149–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R et al (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 141:70–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland CM (1996) Supply chain management, purchasing and supply management, logistics, vertical integration, materials management and supply chain dynamics. In: Slack N (ed) Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of operations management. Blackwell, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi SH et al (2013) A grey-based carbon management model for green supplier selection. In: IEEE international conference 15–17 Nov, pp 402–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Haung SH, Keskar H (2007) Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ 105:510–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho W et al (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong-Jun L, Bin L (2010) A research on supplier assessment indices system of green purchasing. In: IEEE international conference on ICEE 13–14 March, pp 314–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu C-W et al (2013) Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 56:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CW, Hu AH (2008) Green supply chain management in the electronic industry. Int J Environ Sci Technol 5(2):205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CW Hu AH (2009) Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J Clean Prod 17:255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CW et al (2011) Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 56:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P et al (2006) Employing dynamic fuzzy membership functions to assess environmental performance in the supplier selection process. Int J Prod Res 44(12):2379–2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P et al (2003a) Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Syst Appl 25:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys PK et al (2003b) Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan D et al (2014) Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. J Clean Prod. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076

  • Kannan D et al (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 47:355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Jain V (2010) Supplier selection: a green approach with carbon footprint monitoring. In: IEEE international conference on SCMIS pp 1–9, 6–9 Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A et al (2014) A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega 42:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo RJ et al (2010) Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 18(12):1161–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Large RO, Thomsen CG (2011) Drivers of green supply management performance: evidence from Germany. J Purchasing Supply Manage 17(3):176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AHI et al (2009) A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst Appl 36:7917–7927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhao C (2009) Selection of suppliers of vehicle components based on green supply chain. In: IEEE international conference on IE&EM 21–23 Oct, pp 1588–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu LYY et al (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4317–4331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthra S et al (2011) Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: an Indian perspective. J Ind Eng Manag 4(2):231–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Liu T (2011) Supplier selection analysis under the green supply chain. Int Conf Automot Logistics 5:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdalena R (2012) Supplier selection for food industry: a combination of taguchi loss function and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Asian J Technol Manage 5(1):13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Noci G (1997) Designing green vendor rating systems for the assessment of a suppliers environmental performance. Eur J Purchasing Supply Manage 3(2):103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw K et al (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 39:8182–8192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L et al (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour Conserv Recycl 74:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa F, Iraldo F (2010) Shadows and lights of GSCM (green supply chain management): determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. J Clean Prod 18(10–11):953–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thangchattu C, Siripokapirom S (2010) Green supplier selection consensus by neural network. In: IEEE international conference on ICMEE 1–3 Aug, pp 313–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiben S, Spinler S (2014) Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships: An ANP model for collaborative CO2 reduction management. Eur J Oper Res 233:383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruchelvam S, Tookey JE (2011) Evolving trends of supplier selection criteria and methods. Int J Automot Mech Eng (IJAME) 4:437–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Torng C, Tseng KW (2013) Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to construct green suppliers assessment criteria and inspection exemption guidelines. HCI 28:729–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuzkaya G et al (2009) Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6:477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon S, Klassen RD (2006) Green project partnership in the supply chain: the case of package printing industry. J Clean Prod 14(6):661–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber CA et al (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur J Oper Res 50(1):2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen UP, Chi JM (2010) Developing green supplier selection procedure: a DEA approach. In: IEEE international conference on IE&EM, pp 79–74, 29–31 Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittstruck D, Teueberg F (2011) Development and simulation of a balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chain management: a system dynamics approach. In: Writschaftinformatik proceedings 2011, paper 86. http://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2011/86

  • Wong TN et al (2012) CSR and environmental criteria in supplier selection. In: Kachitvichyanukul V, Luong HT, Pitakaso R (eds.) Proceedings of the Asia pacific industrial engineering & management systems conference (APIEMS) 2–5 Dec, pp 74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan G (2009) Research on green suppliers evaluation based on AHP & genetic algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on SPS 15–17 May, pp 615–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Wu L (2008) Extension method for green supplier selection. In: IEEE international conference on WiCom 12–14 Oct, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh WC, Chuang MC (2011) Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Syst Appl 38:4244–4253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying-tuo P Yang C (2011) Iron and steel companies green suppliers’ selection model based on vague sets group decision-making method. In: International conference on electronics, communications and control (ICECC) 9–11 Sept, pp 2702–2705

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HC et al (2003) Using fuzzy multi-agent decision-making in environmentally conscious supplier management. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y et al (2013) Green partner selection in virtual enterprise based on pareto genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2109–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q et al (2010) A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Manag Int J 15(4):306–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izabela Ewa Nielsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Frequency of general supplier selection criteria based on review chapters

No.

Criterion

Dickson (1966)

Weber et al. (1991) (1966–1990)

Cheraghi et al. (2004) (1966–2001)

Ho et al. (2010) (2000–2008)

Thiruchelvam and Tookey (2011) (1966–2010)

Mean rating

Number of articles

Number of articles

Number of articles

Number of articles

1

Quality

3.508

40

71

68

108

2

Delivery

3.417

44

75

64

111

3

Performance history

2.998

7

11

NA

21

4

Warranties and claim policies

2.849

0

1

NA

6

5

Production facilities and capacity

2.775

23

35

NA

55

6

Price

2.758

61

81

63

118

7

Technical capability

2.545

15

30

25

54

8

Financial position

2.514

7

15

23

32

9

Procedural compliance

2.488

2

4

NA

4

10

Communication system

2.426

2

7

NA

14

11

Reputation and its position in industry

2.412

8

10

3

18

12

Desire for business

2.256

1

2

NA

4

13

Management and organization

2.216

10

17

25

39

14

Operating controls

2.211

3

5

NA

5

15

Repair service

2.187

7

18

NA

29

16

Attitude

2.120

6

14

NA

20

17

Impression

2.054

2

6

NA

10

18

Packaging ability

2.009

3

5

NA

9

19

Labor relation record

2.003

2

4

NA

10

20

Geographical location

1.872

16

17

NA

29

21

Amount of past business

1.597

1

1

NA

3

22

Training aids

1.537

2

3

NA

3

23

Reciprocal arrangements

0.610

2

5

NA

5

24

Manufacturing capability

NA

NA

NA

39

NA

25

Service

NA

NA

NA

35

NA

26

Research and development

NA

NA

NA

24

NA

27

Flexibility

NA

NA

NA

18

19

28

Risk

NA

NA

NA

3

NA

29

Safety and environment

NA

NA

NA

3

NA

30

Reliability

NA

NA

NA

NA

11

31

Process improvement

NA

NA

NA

NA

12

32

Product development

NA

NA

NA

NA

19

33

Environmental and social responsibility

NA

NA

NA

NA

9

34

Occupational safety and health

NA

NA

NA

NA

4

35

Integrity

NA

NA

NA

NA

5

36

Professionalism

NA

NA

NA

NA

4

37

JIT

NA

NA

NA

NA

5

38

Commitment

NA

NA

NA

NA

9

39

Economy situation

NA

NA

NA

NA

1

40

Long-term relationship

NA

NA

NA

NA

4

41

Political situation

NA

NA

NA

NA

2

Appendix 2: Frequency of environmental criteria based on reviewing GSS chapters

No.

Environmental criterion

Govindan et al. (2013) (1996–2011)

Frequency (current research)

References

1

Adherence to environmental policies

1

1

Awasthi et al. (2010)

2

Air emission

NA

1

Chiou et al. (2011)

3

Air pollution treatment cost

1

1

Yeh and Chuang (2011)

4

Alternative green supply chain systems, project, practices, etc.

2

2

Buyukozkan and Cifci (2011, 2012)

5

Cleaner production

1

1

Chen et al. (2010)

6

CO2 management competencies

NA

1

Theiben and Spinler (2014)

7

Carbon risk assessment

NA

2

(Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

8

Carbon policy

NA

2

(Hashemi et al. 2013; Hsu and Hu 2009)

9

Carbon accounting and inventory

NA

3

(Hashemi et al. 2013; Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

10

Carbon reduction targets

NA

2

(Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

11

Carbon governance

NA

3

(Hashemi et al. 2013; Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

12

Carbon disclosure and report

NA

2

(Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

13

Carbon emission verification

NA

3

(Hashemi et al. 2013; Hsu and Hu 2009; Zhang et al. 2013)

14

Carbon policy

NA

1

Hsu et al. (2011)

15

Carbon footprint

1

2

(Kumar and Jain 2010; Kumar et al. 2014)

16

Commitment of GSCM from managers

NA

1

Shen et al. (2013)

17

Current environmental efficiency

2

2

(Noci 1997; Grisi et al. 2010)

18

Design for environment

3

5

(Awasthi et al. 2010; Humphreys et al. 2006; Humphreys et al. 2003a, b; Torng and Tseng 2013)

19

Eco-design

1

2

(Hong-Jun and Bin 2010; Shen et al. 2013)

20

Environmental and legislative management

NA

1

Tuzkaya et al. (2009)

21

Environmental management system

11

20

(Amindoust et al. 2012; Azadnia et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2010; Chiou et al. 2008, 2011; Grisi et al. 2010; Hsu et al. 2013; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003a, b; Kannan et al. 2013; Kuo et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2009; Li and Zhao 2009; Shen et al. 2013; Thangchattu and Siripokapirom 2010; Torng and Tseng 2013; Wittstruck and Teueberg 2011; Yan 2009; Zhang et al. 2003)

22

Environmental policies

 1

1

Awasthi et al. (2010)

23

Environment protection

1

4

(Hsu et al. 2011; Kannan et al. 2013; Ma and Liu 2011; Yang and Wu 2008)

24

Environmental authentication

2

2

(Awasthi et al. 2010; Hong-Jun and Bin 2010)

25

Environmental commitment

1

1

Large and Thomsen (2011)

26

Environmental competences

3

6

(Amindoust et al. 2012; Grisi et al. 2010; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003b; Kannan et al. 2014)

27

Environmental criteria

1

1

Lu et al. (2007)

28

Environmental impacts

NA

1

Boosothonsatit et al. (2012)

29

Environmental issues

1

1

Kuo et al. (2010)

30

Environmental performance

3

5

(Chiou et al. 2008, 2011; Feyziogelu and Büyüközkan 2010; Large and Thomsen 2011; Theiben and Spinler 2014)

31

Environmental Programs at the supplier’s facilities

1

1

Handfield et al. (2002)

32

Environmental friendly product design

NA

1

Azadina et al. (2012)

33

Environmental permits and reporting

NA

1

Chiou et al. (2011)

34

Environmental friendship

NA

1

Ying-tuo Yang (2011)

35

Environmental improvement costs

2

5

(Govindan et al. 2013; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003a, b; Tuzkaya et al. 2009)

36

Greenhouse gas emissions

NA

1

Shaw et al. (2012)

37

Green product performance

1

1

Wen and Chi (2010)

38

Green collaboration with suppliers

1

1

Large and Thomsen (2011)

39

Green competencies

3

4

(Büyüközkan and Cifci 2010; Chiou et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2009; Noci 1997)

40

Green design

1

3

(Chen et al. 2010; Hsu and Hu 2008; Lee et al. 2009)

41

Green image

4

8

(Cheraghi et al. 2004; Grisi et al. 2010; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003a; Kannan et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2009; Shen et al. 2013; Tuzkaya et al. 2009; Wen and Chi 2010)

42

Green knowledge transfer

1

1

Bai and Sarkis (2010)

43

Green logistics dimension

2

3

Buyukozkan and Cifci (2011, 2012, 2010)

44

Green management system

1

1

Wen and Chi (2010)

45

Green managerial innovation

1

2

(Awasthi et al. 2010; Chiou et al. 2011)

46

Green process management

NA

1

Tuzkaya et al. (2009)

47

Green market share

1

1

Awasthi et al. (2010)

48

Green process innovation

NA

1

Chiou et al. (2011)

49

Green organizational activities dimension

2

3

Buyukozkan and Cifci (2011, 2012, 2010)

50

Green product

1

2

(Kannan et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2009)

51

Green innovation

NA

1

Kannan et al. (2013)

52

Green product innovation

1

1

Chiou et al. (2011)

53

Green projects partnership

1

1

Vachon and Klassen (2006)

54

Green purchasing

1

1

Chen et al. ( 2010)

55

Green R&D projects

1

1

Awasthi et al. (2010)

56

Green supplier assessment

1

1

Large and Thomsen (2011)

57

Greening the supplier

1

1

Chiou et al. (2011)

58

Hazardous substance management

NA

4

(Chiou et al. 2011; Kannan et al. 2013; Torng and Tseng 2013; Zhang et al. 2013)

59

Internal green production plan

1

1

Chen et al. (2010)

60

Involvement in initiatives for carbon management

NA

2

(Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

61

ISO 14000

1

2

(Chen et al. 2010; Thangchattu and Siripokapirom 2010)

62

Labeling/certification

1

1

Handfield et al. (2002)

63

Life cycle assessment

1

1

Chen et al. (2010)

64

Life cycle management

NA

2

(Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

65

Management systems of carbon information

NA

1

Hsu and Hu (2009)

66

Measure of carbon management

NA

4

(Chiou et al. 2011; Hashemi et al. 2013; Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

67

Outside environmental management

1

1

Hong-Jun and Bin (2010)

68

Packaging/reverse logistic

1

1

Handfield et al. (2002)

69

Partnership with green organization

1

1

Awasthi et al. (2010)

70

Pollution production

NA

1

(Shen et al. 2013)

71

Pollution

NA

1

Azadina et al. (2012)

72

Pollution preventation

NA

1

Chiou et al. (2011)

73

Pollution control

1

4

(Kannan et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2009; Tuzkaya et al. 2009; Yan 2009)

74

Pollution Control initiatives

1

1

Awasthi et al. (2010)

75

Purchasing’s environmental capabilities

1

1

Large and Thomsen (2011)

76

R&D green product

1

1

Chen et al. (2010)

77

Resource reduction

NA

2

(Chiou et al. 2011; Torng and Tseng 2013)

78

Resource consumption

NA

2

(Shen et al. 2013; Torng and Tseng 2013)

79

Recycle

1

2

(Bala et al. 2008; Wittstruck and Teueberg 2011)

80

Reuse

1

1

Yan (2009)

81

Social responsibility and environmental competencies

1

2

Buyukozkan and Cifci (2011, 2012)

82

Staff environmental training

1

2

(Awasthi et al. 2010; Shen et al. 2013)

83

Supplier’s green image

2

2

(Noci 1997; Wen and Chi 2010)

84

Training related to carbon management

NA

2

(Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011)

85

Total product life cycle cost

NA

1

Lee et al. (2009)

86

Distance

NA

1

Kumar et al. (2014)

87

Transportation time

NA

1

Yeh and Chuang (2011)

88

Use of environmental friendly material

NA

2

(Awasthi et al. 2010; Shen et al. 2013)

89

Use environment friendly technology

NA

2

(Awasthi et al. 2010; Shen et al. 2013)

90

Waste management

NA

1

Handfield et al. (2002)

91

Waste water and solid waste

NA

1

Chiou et al. (2011)

92

Waste recovery disposal

NA

1

Yan (2009)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nielsen, I.E., Banaeian, N., Golińska, P., Mobli, H., Omid, M. (2014). Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Flexible Framework for Determination of Suitable Criteria. In: Golinska, P. (eds) Logistics Operations, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability. EcoProduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07287-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics