Abstract
Green supplier selection (GSS) criteria arise from an organization inclination to respond to any existing trends in environmental issues related to business management and processes, so GSS is integrating environmental thinking into conventional supplier selection. This research is designed to determine prevalent general and environmental supplier selection criteria and develop a framework which can help decision makers to determine and prioritize suitable green supplier selection criteria (general and environmental). In this research we considered several parameters (evaluation objectives) to establish suitable criteria for GSS such as their production type, requirements, policy and objectives instead of applying common criteria. At first a comprehensive and deep review on prevalent and green supplier selection literatures performed. Then several evaluation objectives defined to assess the green supplier selection criteria include: frequency, compatibility, quantifiable, easy to understand and assessment. By developed framework suitable criteria can be selected using multi attribute decision making methods. The main contribution of this research is developing a framework to help managers for creating their green supplier criteria list.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amindoust A et al (2012) Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference. Appl Soft Comput 12:1668–1677
Arikan F (2013) An interactive solution approach for multiple objective supplier selection problem with fuzzy parameters. J Intell Manuf. doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0782-6
Awasthi A et al (2010) A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 126:370–378
Azadnia AH et al (2012) Sustainable supplier selection based on self-organizing mapneural network and multi criteria decision making. In: international congress on interdisciplinary business and social science 2012 (ICIBSoS 2012). Procedia Soc Behav Sci (65): 879–884
Bai C, Sarkis J (2010) Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J Clean Prod 18:1200–1210
Bala A et al (2008) Experiences with greening suppliers. The Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. J Clean Prod 16(15):1610–1619
Boosothonsatit K et al (2012) A generic simulation model for green supplier selection. In: Leveraging technology for a sustainable world: proceedings of the 19th CIRP 23–35 May, pp 587–592
Borade AB, Banson SV (2007) Domain of supply chain management-a state of art. J Technol Manage Innov 12:109–121
Buyukozkan G, Cifci G (2011) A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput Ind 62:164–174
Buyukozkan G, Cifci G (2012) A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst Appl 39:3000–3011
Büyüközkan G, Cifci G (2010) Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: a fuzzy ANP approach. Prod Plann Control iFirst 1–14
Chai J et al (2013) Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst Appl 40:3872–3885
Chang B et al (2011) Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):1850–1858
Chen CC et al (2010) Implementation of green supply chain management in uncertainty. In: IEEE international conference on IEEM 7–10 Dec, pp 260–264
Chen Y-J (2011) Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Inf Sci 181:1651–1670
Cheraghi SH et al (2004) Critical success factors for supplier selection: an update. J Appl Bus Res 20(2):91–108
Chiou CY et al (2008) Comparative investigation on green supplier selection of the American, Japanese and Taiwanese electronics industry in China. In: IEEE international conference on IE&EM 8–11 Dec, pp 1909–1914
Chiou TY et al (2011) The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp Res Part E 47: 822–836
Dickson GW (1966) An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions. J Purchasing 2(1):5–17
Dornfeld DA (2013) Green manufacturing: fundamentals and applications. pp 86
Feyziogelu O, Büyüközkan G (2010) Evaluation of green suppliers considering decision criteria dependencies. In: Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems 1, 634. Multiple criteria decision making for sustainable energy and transportation systems, part 2: pp 145–154
Govindan K et al (2013). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Clean Prod XXX: 1–18
Grisi RM et al (2010). Supplier performance evaluation for green supply chain management. Bus Perform Meas Manage Part 4: 149–163
Handfield R et al (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 141:70–87
Harland CM (1996) Supply chain management, purchasing and supply management, logistics, vertical integration, materials management and supply chain dynamics. In: Slack N (ed) Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of operations management. Blackwell, UK
Hashemi SH et al (2013) A grey-based carbon management model for green supplier selection. In: IEEE international conference 15–17 Nov, pp 402–405
Haung SH, Keskar H (2007) Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ 105:510–523
Ho W et al (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):16–24
Hong-Jun L, Bin L (2010) A research on supplier assessment indices system of green purchasing. In: IEEE international conference on ICEE 13–14 March, pp 314–317
Hsu C-W et al (2013) Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 56:164–172
Hsu CW, Hu AH (2008) Green supply chain management in the electronic industry. Int J Environ Sci Technol 5(2):205–216
Hsu CW Hu AH (2009) Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J Clean Prod 17:255–264
Hsu CW et al (2011) Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 56:164–172
Humphreys P et al (2006) Employing dynamic fuzzy membership functions to assess environmental performance in the supplier selection process. Int J Prod Res 44(12):2379–2419
Humphreys P et al (2003a) Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Syst Appl 25:141–153
Humphreys PK et al (2003b) Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. J Mater Process Technol 138(1–3):349–356
Kannan D et al (2014) Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. J Clean Prod. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076
Kannan D et al (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 47:355–367
Kumar A, Jain V (2010) Supplier selection: a green approach with carbon footprint monitoring. In: IEEE international conference on SCMIS pp 1–9, 6–9 Oct 2010
Kumar A et al (2014) A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega 42:109–123
Kuo RJ et al (2010) Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod 18(12):1161–1170
Large RO, Thomsen CG (2011) Drivers of green supply management performance: evidence from Germany. J Purchasing Supply Manage 17(3):176–184
Lee AHI et al (2009) A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst Appl 36:7917–7927
Li X, Zhao C (2009) Selection of suppliers of vehicle components based on green supply chain. In: IEEE international conference on IE&EM 21–23 Oct, pp 1588–1591
Lu LYY et al (2007) Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4317–4331
Luthra S et al (2011) Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: an Indian perspective. J Ind Eng Manag 4(2):231–257
Ma X, Liu T (2011) Supplier selection analysis under the green supply chain. Int Conf Automot Logistics 5:205–209
Magdalena R (2012) Supplier selection for food industry: a combination of taguchi loss function and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Asian J Technol Manage 5(1):13–22
Noci G (1997) Designing green vendor rating systems for the assessment of a suppliers environmental performance. Eur J Purchasing Supply Manage 3(2):103–114
Shaw K et al (2012) Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl 39:8182–8192
Shen L et al (2013) A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier’s performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour Conserv Recycl 74:170–179
Testa F, Iraldo F (2010) Shadows and lights of GSCM (green supply chain management): determinants and effects of these practices based on a multi-national study. J Clean Prod 18(10–11):953–962
Thangchattu C, Siripokapirom S (2010) Green supplier selection consensus by neural network. In: IEEE international conference on ICMEE 1–3 Aug, pp 313–316
Theiben S, Spinler S (2014) Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships: An ANP model for collaborative CO2 reduction management. Eur J Oper Res 233:383–397
Thiruchelvam S, Tookey JE (2011) Evolving trends of supplier selection criteria and methods. Int J Automot Mech Eng (IJAME) 4:437–454
Torng C, Tseng KW (2013) Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to construct green suppliers assessment criteria and inspection exemption guidelines. HCI 28:729–732
Tuzkaya G et al (2009) Environmental performance evaluation of suppliers: a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 6:477–490
Vachon S, Klassen RD (2006) Green project partnership in the supply chain: the case of package printing industry. J Clean Prod 14(6):661–671
Weber CA et al (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur J Oper Res 50(1):2–18
Wen UP, Chi JM (2010) Developing green supplier selection procedure: a DEA approach. In: IEEE international conference on IE&EM, pp 79–74, 29–31 Oct 2010
Wittstruck D, Teueberg F (2011) Development and simulation of a balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chain management: a system dynamics approach. In: Writschaftinformatik proceedings 2011, paper 86. http://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2011/86
Wong TN et al (2012) CSR and environmental criteria in supplier selection. In: Kachitvichyanukul V, Luong HT, Pitakaso R (eds.) Proceedings of the Asia pacific industrial engineering & management systems conference (APIEMS) 2–5 Dec, pp 74–84
Yan G (2009) Research on green suppliers evaluation based on AHP & genetic algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on SPS 15–17 May, pp 615–619
Yang Y, Wu L (2008) Extension method for green supplier selection. In: IEEE international conference on WiCom 12–14 Oct, pp 1–4
Yeh WC, Chuang MC (2011) Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Syst Appl 38:4244–4253
Ying-tuo P Yang C (2011) Iron and steel companies green suppliers’ selection model based on vague sets group decision-making method. In: International conference on electronics, communications and control (ICECC) 9–11 Sept, pp 2702–2705
Zhang HC et al (2003) Using fuzzy multi-agent decision-making in environmentally conscious supplier management. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):385–388
Zhang Y et al (2013) Green partner selection in virtual enterprise based on pareto genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2109–2125
Zhu Q et al (2010) A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Manag Int J 15(4):306–319
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Frequency of general supplier selection criteria based on review chapters
No. | Criterion | Dickson (1966) | Weber et al. (1991) (1966–1990) | Cheraghi et al. (2004) (1966–2001) | Ho et al. (2010) (2000–2008) | Thiruchelvam and Tookey (2011) (1966–2010) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean rating | Number of articles | Number of articles | Number of articles | Number of articles | ||
1 | Quality | 3.508 | 40 | 71 | 68 | 108 |
2 | Delivery | 3.417 | 44 | 75 | 64 | 111 |
3 | Performance history | 2.998 | 7 | 11 | NA | 21 |
4 | Warranties and claim policies | 2.849 | 0 | 1 | NA | 6 |
5 | Production facilities and capacity | 2.775 | 23 | 35 | NA | 55 |
6 | Price | 2.758 | 61 | 81 | 63 | 118 |
7 | Technical capability | 2.545 | 15 | 30 | 25 | 54 |
8 | Financial position | 2.514 | 7 | 15 | 23 | 32 |
9 | Procedural compliance | 2.488 | 2 | 4 | NA | 4 |
10 | Communication system | 2.426 | 2 | 7 | NA | 14 |
11 | Reputation and its position in industry | 2.412 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 18 |
12 | Desire for business | 2.256 | 1 | 2 | NA | 4 |
13 | Management and organization | 2.216 | 10 | 17 | 25 | 39 |
14 | Operating controls | 2.211 | 3 | 5 | NA | 5 |
15 | Repair service | 2.187 | 7 | 18 | NA | 29 |
16 | Attitude | 2.120 | 6 | 14 | NA | 20 |
17 | Impression | 2.054 | 2 | 6 | NA | 10 |
18 | Packaging ability | 2.009 | 3 | 5 | NA | 9 |
19 | Labor relation record | 2.003 | 2 | 4 | NA | 10 |
20 | Geographical location | 1.872 | 16 | 17 | NA | 29 |
21 | Amount of past business | 1.597 | 1 | 1 | NA | 3 |
22 | Training aids | 1.537 | 2 | 3 | NA | 3 |
23 | Reciprocal arrangements | 0.610 | 2 | 5 | NA | 5 |
24 | Manufacturing capability | NA | NA | NA | 39 | NA |
25 | Service | NA | NA | NA | 35 | NA |
26 | Research and development | NA | NA | NA | 24 | NA |
27 | Flexibility | NA | NA | NA | 18 | 19 |
28 | Risk | NA | NA | NA | 3 | NA |
29 | Safety and environment | NA | NA | NA | 3 | NA |
30 | Reliability | NA | NA | NA | NA | 11 |
31 | Process improvement | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 |
32 | Product development | NA | NA | NA | NA | 19 |
33 | Environmental and social responsibility | NA | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
34 | Occupational safety and health | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4 |
35 | Integrity | NA | NA | NA | NA | 5 |
36 | Professionalism | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4 |
37 | JIT | NA | NA | NA | NA | 5 |
38 | Commitment | NA | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
39 | Economy situation | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 |
40 | Long-term relationship | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4 |
41 | Political situation | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2 |
Appendix 2: Frequency of environmental criteria based on reviewing GSS chapters
No. | Environmental criterion | Govindan et al. (2013) (1996–2011) | Frequency (current research) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Adherence to environmental policies | 1 | 1 | Awasthi et al. (2010) |
2 | Air emission | NA | 1 | Chiou et al. (2011) |
3 | Air pollution treatment cost | 1 | 1 | Yeh and Chuang (2011) |
4 | Alternative green supply chain systems, project, practices, etc. | 2 | 2 | |
5 | Cleaner production | 1 | 1 | Chen et al. (2010) |
6 | CO2 management competencies | NA | 1 | Theiben and Spinler (2014) |
7 | Carbon risk assessment | NA | 2 | |
8 | Carbon policy | NA | 2 | |
9 | Carbon accounting and inventory | NA | 3 | |
10 | Carbon reduction targets | NA | 2 | |
11 | Carbon governance | NA | 3 | |
12 | Carbon disclosure and report | NA | 2 | |
13 | Carbon emission verification | NA | 3 | |
14 | Carbon policy | NA | 1 | Hsu et al. (2011) |
15 | Carbon footprint | 1 | 2 | |
16 | Commitment of GSCM from managers | NA | 1 | Shen et al. (2013) |
17 | Current environmental efficiency | 2 | 2 | |
18 | Design for environment | 3 | 5 | (Awasthi et al. 2010; Humphreys et al. 2006; Humphreys et al. 2003a, b; Torng and Tseng 2013) |
19 | Eco-design | 1 | 2 | |
20 | Environmental and legislative management | NA | 1 | Tuzkaya et al. (2009) |
21 | Environmental management system | 11 | 20 | (Amindoust et al. 2012; Azadnia et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2010; Chiou et al. 2008, 2011; Grisi et al. 2010; Hsu et al. 2013; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003a, b; Kannan et al. 2013; Kuo et al. 2010; Lee et al. 2009; Li and Zhao 2009; Shen et al. 2013; Thangchattu and Siripokapirom 2010; Torng and Tseng 2013; Wittstruck and Teueberg 2011; Yan 2009; Zhang et al. 2003) |
22 | Environmental policies | 1 | 1 | Awasthi et al. (2010) |
23 | Environment protection | 1 | 4 | (Hsu et al. 2011; Kannan et al. 2013; Ma and Liu 2011; Yang and Wu 2008) |
24 | Environmental authentication | 2 | 2 | |
25 | Environmental commitment | 1 | 1 | Large and Thomsen (2011) |
26 | Environmental competences | 3 | 6 | (Amindoust et al. 2012; Grisi et al. 2010; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003b; Kannan et al. 2014) |
27 | Environmental criteria | 1 | 1 | Lu et al. (2007) |
28 | Environmental impacts | NA | 1 | Boosothonsatit et al. (2012) |
29 | Environmental issues | 1 | 1 | Kuo et al. (2010) |
30 | Environmental performance | 3 | 5 | (Chiou et al. 2008, 2011; Feyziogelu and Büyüközkan 2010; Large and Thomsen 2011; Theiben and Spinler 2014) |
31 | Environmental Programs at the supplier’s facilities | 1 | 1 | Handfield et al. (2002) |
32 | Environmental friendly product design | NA | 1 | Azadina et al. (2012) |
33 | Environmental permits and reporting | NA | 1 | Chiou et al. (2011) |
34 | Environmental friendship | NA | 1 | Ying-tuo Yang (2011) |
35 | Environmental improvement costs | 2 | 5 | (Govindan et al. 2013; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003a, b; Tuzkaya et al. 2009) |
36 | Greenhouse gas emissions | NA | 1 | Shaw et al. (2012) |
37 | Green product performance | 1 | 1 | Wen and Chi (2010) |
38 | Green collaboration with suppliers | 1 | 1 | Large and Thomsen (2011) |
39 | Green competencies | 3 | 4 | (Büyüközkan and Cifci 2010; Chiou et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2009; Noci 1997) |
40 | Green design | 1 | 3 | |
41 | Green image | 4 | 8 | (Cheraghi et al. 2004; Grisi et al. 2010; Humphreys et al. 2006, 2003a; Kannan et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2009; Shen et al. 2013; Tuzkaya et al. 2009; Wen and Chi 2010) |
42 | Green knowledge transfer | 1 | 1 | Bai and Sarkis (2010) |
43 | Green logistics dimension | 2 | 3 | |
44 | Green management system | 1 | 1 | Wen and Chi (2010) |
45 | Green managerial innovation | 1 | 2 | |
46 | Green process management | NA | 1 | Tuzkaya et al. (2009) |
47 | Green market share | 1 | 1 | Awasthi et al. (2010) |
48 | Green process innovation | NA | 1 | Chiou et al. (2011) |
49 | Green organizational activities dimension | 2 | 3 | |
50 | Green product | 1 | 2 | |
51 | Green innovation | NA | 1 | Kannan et al. (2013) |
52 | Green product innovation | 1 | 1 | Chiou et al. (2011) |
53 | Green projects partnership | 1 | 1 | Vachon and Klassen (2006) |
54 | Green purchasing | 1 | 1 | Chen et al. ( 2010) |
55 | Green R&D projects | 1 | 1 | Awasthi et al. (2010) |
56 | Green supplier assessment | 1 | 1 | Large and Thomsen (2011) |
57 | Greening the supplier | 1 | 1 | Chiou et al. (2011) |
58 | Hazardous substance management | NA | 4 | (Chiou et al. 2011; Kannan et al. 2013; Torng and Tseng 2013; Zhang et al. 2013) |
59 | Internal green production plan | 1 | 1 | Chen et al. (2010) |
60 | Involvement in initiatives for carbon management | NA | 2 | |
61 | ISO 14000 | 1 | 2 | |
62 | Labeling/certification | 1 | 1 | Handfield et al. (2002) |
63 | Life cycle assessment | 1 | 1 | Chen et al. (2010) |
64 | Life cycle management | NA | 2 | |
65 | Management systems of carbon information | NA | 1 | Hsu and Hu (2009) |
66 | Measure of carbon management | NA | 4 | (Chiou et al. 2011; Hashemi et al. 2013; Hsu and Hu 2009; Hsu et al. 2011) |
67 | Outside environmental management | 1 | 1 | Hong-Jun and Bin (2010) |
68 | Packaging/reverse logistic | 1 | 1 | Handfield et al. (2002) |
69 | Partnership with green organization | 1 | 1 | Awasthi et al. (2010) |
70 | Pollution production | NA | 1 | (Shen et al. 2013) |
71 | Pollution | NA | 1 | Azadina et al. (2012) |
72 | Pollution preventation | NA | 1 | Chiou et al. (2011) |
73 | Pollution control | 1 | 4 | (Kannan et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2009; Tuzkaya et al. 2009; Yan 2009) |
74 | Pollution Control initiatives | 1 | 1 | Awasthi et al. (2010) |
75 | Purchasing’s environmental capabilities | 1 | 1 | Large and Thomsen (2011) |
76 | R&D green product | 1 | 1 | Chen et al. (2010) |
77 | Resource reduction | NA | 2 | |
78 | Resource consumption | NA | 2 | |
79 | Recycle | 1 | 2 | |
80 | Reuse | 1 | 1 | Yan (2009) |
81 | Social responsibility and environmental competencies | 1 | 2 | |
82 | Staff environmental training | 1 | 2 | |
83 | Supplier’s green image | 2 | 2 | |
84 | Training related to carbon management | NA | 2 | |
85 | Total product life cycle cost | NA | 1 | Lee et al. (2009) |
86 | Distance | NA | 1 | Kumar et al. (2014) |
87 | Transportation time | NA | 1 | Yeh and Chuang (2011) |
88 | Use of environmental friendly material | NA | 2 | |
89 | Use environment friendly technology | NA | 2 | |
90 | Waste management | NA | 1 | Handfield et al. (2002) |
91 | Waste water and solid waste | NA | 1 | Chiou et al. (2011) |
92 | Waste recovery disposal | NA | 1 | Yan (2009) |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nielsen, I.E., Banaeian, N., Golińska, P., Mobli, H., Omid, M. (2014). Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Flexible Framework for Determination of Suitable Criteria. In: Golinska, P. (eds) Logistics Operations, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability. EcoProduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07287-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07287-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07286-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07287-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)