Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter, the explicit solution for tuning the PID controller parameters in the presence of integrating process is presented. The presence of one integrator coming from the plant along with one integrator coming from the PID-type control action results in a type-II control loop according to Sect. 2.5. The proposed control law is developed again in the frequency domain and lies in the principle of the symmetrical optimum criterion which, strictly speaking, is the application of the Magnitude Optimum criterion in type-II control loops. Therefore, the desired control action requires again that the magnitude of the closed-loop transfer function is equal to the unity in the widest possible frequency range. For the proof of the control law, a general transfer function process model is adopted consisting of \(n\) poles, \(m\) zeros plus unknown time delay \(d\). The final solution determines explicitly the P, I, and D parameters as a function of all time constants involved within the control loop and irrespective of the process complexity. The potential of the proposed method is tested both (1) on benchmark process models (integrating process with dominant time constants, integrating non-minimum phase process, integrating process with long time delay). The proposed control action is tested also for the control of the actual DC link voltage in an AC/DC grid connected converter. In all cases, an extensive comparison test is presented between the conventional current state-of-the-art PID tuning and the proposed control law, justifying the potential of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this case, a grid connected converter controls the DC Link which is then used by the motor side converter which finally drives the motor.

  2. 2.

    In the case of the island network, auxiliary small diesel generators are completely switched off since they are consuming expensive oil, and the energy is coming from the main diesel engine of the ship which drives the propeller.

  3. 3.

    Grid of the vessel supporting the electrical load of the vessel.

  4. 4.

    SFOC: stator field-oriented control, RFOC: rotor field-oriented control.

  5. 5.

    In many real-world applications, \(k_\mathrm{p}\) stands for the plant’s dc gain at steady state.

  6. 6.

    This kind of instability is justified by the Routh theorem. For a polynomial of the form \(D\left( s \right) = {a_n}{s^n} + {a_{n - 1}}{s^{n - 1}} + \cdots + {a_1}s + {a_0}\), necessary condition for \(D\left( s \right) \) to be stable is \(a_j>0\), \(j=0,1,2,\ldots \) Since in (4.6) \(a_1=0\), then according to the Routh theorem, the denominator \(D(s)\) of \({ T}(s)\) is unstable.

  7. 7.

    Let it be noted that the conventional tuning has never been tested to non-minimum phase processes within the academic literature.

References

  1. Åström KJ, Hang CC, Lim BC (1994) A new Smith predictor for controlling a process with an integrator and long dead time. IEEE Trans Autom Control 39(2):343–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bahrani B, Kenzelmann S, Rufer A (2011) Multivariable-PI-based current control of voltage source converters with superior axis decoupling capability. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 58(7):3016–3026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Habetler TG (1993) A space vector-based rectifier regulator for AC/DC/AC converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 8(1):30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler C (1955) UG ber die Vorausberechnung optimal abgestimmter regelkreise teil III. Die optimale einstellung des reglers nach dem betragsoptimum. Regelungstechnik 3:40–49

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kessler C (1958) Das symmetrische optimum, Regelungstechnik pp 395–400 and 432–426

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li S, Pingxi Y, Lifei L, Lin C, Liuxin B, Gang C, Chao Z (2012) Research on grid-connected operation of novel variable speed constant frequency (VSCF) shaft generator system on modern ship. In: 15th international conference on electrical machines and systems. ICEMS, IEEE, Sapporo, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mataušek MR, Micić AD (1999) On the modified Smith predictor for controlling a process with an integrator and long dead-time. IEEE Trans Autom Control 44(8):1603–1606

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mirecki A, Roboam X, Richardeau F (2007) Architecture complexity and energy efficiency of small wind turbines. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 54(1):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishikata S, Tatsuta F (2010) A new interconnecting method for wind turbine/generators in a wind farm and basic performances of the integrated system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(2):468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oldenbourg RC, Sartorius H (1954) A uniform approach to the optimum adjustment of control loops. Trans ASME 76:1265–1279

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papadopoulos KG, Margaris NI (2012) Extending the symmetrical optimum criterion to the design of pid type-p control loops. J Process Control 12(1):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papadopoulos KG, Siemaszko D, Margaris NI (2012) Optimal automatic tuning of PID controllers applied to grid converters. In: Electrical systems for aircraft, railway and ship propulsion (ESARS). IEEE, Bologna, Italy, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papadopoulos KG, Papastefanaki EN, Margaris NI (2013) Explicit analytical PID tuning rules for the design of type-III control loops. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60(10):4650–4664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parlmor ZJ (1996) Time delay compensation—Smith predictor and its modifications. In: Levine WS (ed) Control handbook, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, vol 53, pp 224–237

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard JP (2003) Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica 39(10):1667–1694

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sartorius H (1945) Die zweckmässige festlegung der frei wählbaren regelungskonstanten. Master thesis, Technische Hochscule, Stuttgart, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shafiei Z, Shenton AT (1994) Tuning of PID-type controllers for stable and unstable systems with time delay. Automatica 30(10):1609–1615

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith OJM (1959) Closed control of loops with dead-time. Chem Eng Sci 53:217–219

    Google Scholar 

  19. Umland WJ, Safiuddin M (1990) Magnitude and symmetric optimum criterion for the design of linear control systems: what is it and how does it compare with the others? IEEE Trans Ind Appl 26(3):489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang QC, Hang CC, Yang PX (2001) Single-loop controller design via IMC principles. Automatica 37(12):2041–2048

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Watanabe K, Ito M (1981) A process model control for linear systems with delay. IEEE Trans Autom Control 26(6):1261–1268

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang W, Xu X, Sun Y (1999) Quantitative performance design for integrating processes with time delay. Automatica 35(4):719–723

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos G. Papadopoulos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papadopoulos, K.G. (2015). Type-II Control Loops. In: PID Controller Tuning Using the Magnitude Optimum Criterion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07263-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07263-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07262-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07263-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics