Skip to main content

Product Labelling and Standards: Business Participation in Energy Efficiency Regimes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business and Sustainability

Part of the book series: Sustainability and Innovation ((SUSTAINABILITY))

  • 1826 Accesses

Abstract

A common view of business in political science and sociology is that capital owners, managers, firms and their associations are only short-term profit-seekers. If this were true, business “as such” would have fought against social and environmental policies at all times and in all places. In fact, business contributed to many long-term problem-solving processes with respect to social and environmental issues. Most of these ecological approaches are currently subsumed under the concept of sustainability, and one of the most important strategies in this respect is energy saving. Since our world’s energy resources are limited and the usage of many energy forms implies some severe long-term negative externalities (e.g. global warming or radio activity), energy saving is one of the key strategies that contribute to sustainable social and economic development. In this chapter, we study a special area of energy saving and energy efficiency improvement, that is, the reduction of electricity consumption in private households. With respect to the numbers and types of policy measures designed to reduce energy consumption, there is large variation between countries. Many countries apply regulatory measures (voluntary or mandatory norms and standards with respect to energy efficient appliances), labelling programs, information campaigns, and counselling activities. We focus on product standards and environmental labelling. Both types of policy instruments are well established measures in helping reduce energy consuption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United States is the ideal type of liberal market economy. Other LMEs include Australia, Canada, New Zealand and United Kingdom.

  2. 2.

    Coordinated market economies include Austria, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and Sweden among many others.

  3. 3.

    DIRECTIVE 2005/32/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.

  4. 4.

    REGULATION (EC) No 2422/2001 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 November 2001 on a Community energy efficiency labelling programme for office equipment.

  5. 5.

    COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 92/75/EEC of 22 September 1992 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by household appliances.

  6. 6.

    DIRECTIVE 2006/32/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 5 April 2006 on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC.

  7. 7.

    DIRECTIVE 2002/91/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings.

  8. 8.

    DIRECTIVE 2010/30/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products.

References

  • Allison, C., & Carter, A. (2000). Study on different types of environmental labelling (ISO Type II and III Labels): Proposal for an environmental labelling strategy. Brussels: DG Environment, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANEC/BEUC. (2008). Consumers strongly in favour of keeping the A-G Energy Label. http://www.anec.eu/attachments/ANEC-PR-2008-PRL-009.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2011.

  • Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). (2012). Compendium of energy efficiency policies of APEC economies. Tokyo: Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., & Solomon, B. D. (2003). Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: A meta-evaluation of US programs. Energy Policy, 31(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozowsky, E., & Mizuno, H. (2004). Introduction to ecolabelling. Ottawa: Global Ecolabelling Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brohmann, B., Bürger, V., Dehmel, C., Fuchs, D., Hamenstädt, U., & Krömker, D. (2012). Sustainable electricity consumption in German households – Framework conditions for political interventions. In R. Defila, A. Di Giulio, & R. Kaufmann-Hayoz (Eds.), The nature of sustainable consumption and how to achieve it (pp. 399–409). München: oekom Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • BUND/DUH. (2009). Stellungnahme zur Neugestaltung der EU Energieverbrauchskennzeichnung. http://www.bund.net/fileadmin/bundnet/pdfs/klima_und_energie/20091111_energie_label_stellungnahme.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2011.

  • Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. New York: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 863–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J. (1996). Energy labeling, standards, and building codes: A global survey and assessment for selected developing countries. Washington, DC: International Institute for Energy Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee of Manufacturers of Domestic Equipment (CECED). (2004). Summary of CECED unilateral industrial commitments. Brussels: CECED.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee of Manufacturers of Domestic Equipment (CECED). (2007). Top executives discontinue energy efficiency agreements. Brussels: CECED, Press Release 21 March 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridley, D., Aden, N., Zhou, N., & Lin, J. (2007). Impacts of China’s current appliance standards and labeling program to 2020. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Environmental Energy Technologies Division.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., & Rees, J. (1997). Industry self regulation: An institutional perspective. Law & Policy, 19(4), 363–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Lad, L. J. (1983). Industry self-regulation: An economic, organizational, and political analysis. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 416–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001a). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001b). An introduction to varieties of capitalism (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinzle, S. L., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2012). Dynamic adjustment of eco‐labeling schemes and consumer choice – The revision of the EU energy label as a missed opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, T. A. (1992). Self-regulating industry behavior: Antitrust limitations and trade association codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(12), 915–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2012). Environmental labels and declarations. How ISO standards help. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T., & Laux, J. (2008). Energy star: A competitive advantage? Journal of Business Case Studies, 4(10), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. (2002). Appliance efficiency standards and labeling programs in China. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27(1), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. (2006). Potential energy savings and environmental impact by implementing energy efficiency standard for household refrigerators in China. Energy Policy, 34(13), 1583–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlia, T., Masjuki, H., & Choudhury, I. (2002). Theory of energy efficiency standards and labels. Energy Conversion and Management, 43(6), 743–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martz, L., & Bishop, J., Jr. (1976). Energy: A bill and a prayer. Newsweek

    Google Scholar 

  • Maur, J.-C., & Shepherd, B. (2011). Product standards. In J.-P. Chauffour & J.-C. Maur (Eds.), Preferential trade agreements policies for development: A handbook (pp. 197–216). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcmahon, J. E., & Turiel, I. (1997). Introduction to special issue devoted to appliance and lighting standards. Energy and Buildings, 26(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. G., & Siikamäki, J. V. (2013). Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The role of information labels (RFF Discussion Paper 13–17). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg-Bohm, V. (1999). Stimulating ‘green’ technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms. Policy Sciences, 32(1), 13–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Fair Trading (OFT). (2008). The competition impact of environmental product standards. London: OFT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R. B. (2004). Two pathways to energy efficiency: An energy star case study. Human Ecology Review, 11(3), 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, L., Levine, M. D., Zhou, N., Fridley, D., Aden, N., Lu, H., et al. (2011). Assessment of China’s energy-saving and emission-reduction accomplishments and opportunities during the 11th Five Year Plan. Energy Policy, 39(4), 2165–2178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J. V. (1988). Reforming the workplace: A study of self-regulation in occupational safety. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerzhagen, C., Frieling, T., Hansen, N., Minnaert, A., Netzer, N., & Ruãÿbild, J. (2009). Energy efficiency in buildings in China: Policies, barriers and opportunities. Bonn: German Development Institute (DIE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, S. D., & Stanwick, P. A. (1999). Exploring voluntary environmental partnerships. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 10(3), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state – and associations ? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. In W. Streeck & P. C. Schmitter (Eds.), Private interest governments (pp. 1–29). London et al.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolchin, M. (1987). WASHINGTON TALK; An industry asks for regulation. The New York Times. New York: The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Energy. (2010). Multi-year program plan – Building regulatory programs. Washington: U.S. DoE.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2012). ENERGY STAR® and other climate protection partnerships. 2011 Annual Report. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaohua, W., & Zhenmin, F. (2001). Rural household energy consumption with the economic development in China: Stages and characteristic indices. Energy Policy, 29(15), 1391–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, N., Levine, M. D., & Price, L. (2010). Overview of current energy-efficiency policies in China. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6439–6452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achim Lang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lang, A., Malang, T., Schneider, V. (2014). Product Labelling and Standards: Business Participation in Energy Efficiency Regimes. In: Lang, A., Murphy, H. (eds) Business and Sustainability. Sustainability and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics