Abstract
This chapter is concerned with an issue of central importance to environmental sustainability. Plant protection products are necessary to ensure security of food supply, but as toxic substances they also pose a series of potential challenges to the environment, including water pollution and possible threats to human and animal health and hence to biodiversity. This is why they are heavily regulated.
Conventional synthetic products are becoming less available and less popular. Many older products have been withdrawn for regulatory or commercial reasons. Others become subject to heritable resistance. The rate at which new, safer chemicals are being made available is very low. This is caused by a fall in the discovery rate of new active molecules and the increasing costs of registration. This creates a need for the use of alternative products as part of a more general Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy. Biopesticides are not necessarily substitutes for synthetic pesticides and are often used alongside synthetics as complementary products.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bailey, A., Chandler, D., Grant, W. P., Greaves, J., Prince, G., & Tatchell, M. (2010). Biopesticides: Pest management and regulation. Wallingford: CABI Books.
Business Regulation Team. (2003). Regulatory impact unit: 2003 report. London: Cabinet Office.
Chandler, D., Bailey, A. S., Tatchell, G. M., Davidson, G., Greaves, J., & Grant, W. P. (2011). The development, regulation and use of biopesticides for integrated pest management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366(1573), 1987–1998.
Defra. (2007). Consultation on the future of the Pesticides Safety Directorate. London: HMSO.
Grant, W. (2010). Environmental and food safety policy. In D. Coen, W. Grant, & G. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and government (pp. 663–683). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greaves, J., & Grant, W. (2010). Underperforming policy networks: The biopesticides policy network in the United Kingdom. British Politics, 5(1), 14–40.
IBMA. (2009). IBMA request for clarification of position of ‘grey area’ products in the UK (Internal document submitted to CDR). Mourenx: International Biocontrol Manufacturers’ Association.
IR-4 Project. (2004). Annual report. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
Lang, A., Schneider, V., & Werle, R. (2008). Between politics, economy and technology: The changing environments of business associations. In J. Grote, A. Lang, & V. Schneider (Eds.), Organized business interests in changing environments: The complexity of adaptation (pp. 42–62). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Marrone, P. G. (2007). Barriers to adoption of biological control agents and biological pesticides. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2(051), 1–12.
Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
PSD. (2004). Pesticides Safety Directorate annual report and accounts 2003/04. London: HMSO.
Rationale. (2010). Rationale biopesticide strategists. www.biorationale.co.uk. Accessed 4 May 2011.
Waage, J. K. (1997). Biopesticides at the crossroads: IPM products or chemical clones? BCPC Symposium Proceedings, 68, 11–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grant, W. (2014). Environmental and Regulatory Sustainability of Biopesticides. In: Lang, A., Murphy, H. (eds) Business and Sustainability. Sustainability and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07238-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07239-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)