Abstract
The chapters in this edited book investigated how business deals with different issues of sustainability. The aim of achieving sustainability seems to be widely accepted. This chapter provides a comparative assessment of the previous empirical chapters and relates their empirical findings to the propositions put forth by Schmitter as well as the motivations of business to join the collective action and self regulatory regimes which were scrutinised in the introductory chapter. The argument proceeds as follows. The next section describes the dimensions of sustainability that were analysed in the empirical chapters. Then, the different forms of business participation are compared. The final section provides a comparative assessment of enabling factors which either nudge or enforce business participation in sustainability policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.
Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 1–24.
Gunningham, N., & Rees, J. (1997). Industry self regulation: An institutional perspective. Law & Policy, 19(4), 363–414.
Gupta, A. K., & Lad, L. J. (1983). Industry self-regulation: An economic, organizational, and political analysis. Academy of Management Review, 8, 416–425.
Hollingsworth, J. R., Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (1994). Governing capitalist economies: Performance and control of economic sectors. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Melé, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility theories. In A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 48–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moldan, B., Janouskova, S., & Hak, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.
Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 1–32.
Sands, G. R., & Podmore, T. H. (2000). A generalized environmental sustainability index for agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 79(1), 29–41.
Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (1999). The organization of business interests. Köln: MPIfG.
Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Private interest government. London: Sage.
Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lang, A. (2014). Business and Sustainability: A Synopsis. In: Lang, A., Murphy, H. (eds) Business and Sustainability. Sustainability and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07238-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07239-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)