Advertisement

Efficiency in Performing Basic Tasks Using Word Processing Programs by the Elderly as a Measure of the Ergonomic Quality of Software

  • Krzysztof Hankiewicz
  • Marcin Butlewski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8510)

Abstract

Computers and the opportunities they offer are no longer the domain of the young, and the ability to use a multitude of computer software has become a basic skill both in private and professional life. Therefore, it is no wonder that increasing attention is paid to the design of interfaces adapted well to groups of users with specific needs, like the elderly. Such measures are broadly reflected in scientific works, however, commonly available software is rarely marked by an adequate concern for the needs of seniors. Additionally, the elderly usually gain access and opportunity to work on a computer during old age, being outpaced by their younger, and somewhat more predisposed to computer technology, colleagues. The prevalence of computer needs and growing number of elderly people means that seniors are condemned to using computers. How effectively and enthusiastically they will use them will be largely dependent on the ergonomic quality of the offered software.

Keywords

elderly design ergonomic evolution software usability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bajda, A., Wrażeń, M., Laskowski, D.: Diagnostics the quality of data transfer in the management of crisis situation. Electrical Review 87(9A), 72–78 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bichard, J.-A., Greene, C., Ramster, G., Staples, T.: Designing ethnographic encounters for enriched HCI. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI/HCII 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8009, pp. 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Branowski, B., Zabłocki, M.: Creation and contamination of design principles and construction principles in the design for people with disabilities. In: Ergonomics of the Product. Ergonomic Principles of Products Design (2006) (in Polish)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butlewski, M., Tytyk, E.: The assessment criteria of the ergonomic quality of anthropotechnical mega-systems. In: Vink, P. (ed.) Advances in Social and Organizational Factors, pp. 298–306. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, London (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butlewski, M.: Extension of working time in Poland as a challenge for ergonomic design. Machines, Technologies, Materials, International Virtual Journal VII(11) (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Age differences in attitudes toward computers. Journal of Gerontology 53(5), 329–340 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Follette, M.S.: Maximizing Usability: The Principles of Universal Design. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA 10(1), 4–12 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Hertzum, M., Hornbæk, K.: How Age Affects Pointing With Mouse and Touchpad: A Comparison of Young, Adult, and Elderly Users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26(7) (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M.: The role of ergonomics in implementation of the social aspect of sustainability, illustrated with the example of maintenance. In: Arezes, P., Baptista, J.S., Barroso, M., Carneiro, P., Lamb, P., Costa, N., Melo, R., Miguel, A.S., Perestrelo, G. (eds.) Occupational Safety and Hygiene, pp. 47–52. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karavidas, M., Lim, N., Katsikas, S.: The effects of computers on older adult users. Computers in Human Behavior 21(5), 697–711 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Namazi, K.H., McClintic, M.: Computer use among Elderly persons in long-term care facilities. Educational Gerontology 29(6) (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Microsoft Office 2010 and 2007 for Seniors, http://www.visualsteps.com/officeseniors/
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Newell, A.F., Gregor, P.: Design for older and disabled people – where do we go from here? Universal Access in the Information Society 2(1), 3–7 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prussak, W., Hankiewicz, K.: Usability estimation of quality management system software. In: 11th International Conference on Human - Computer Interaction, July 22-27. Caesars Palace - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rousseau, G.K., Rogers, W.A.: Computer usage patterns of university faculty members across the life span. Computers in Human Behavior 14, 417–428 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, L.M.: An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies. Review of Research in Education 6, 316–377 (1979)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    The results of the National Census of Population (2011), http://www.stat.gov.pl/bdl/app/strona.html?p_name=indeks

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krzysztof Hankiewicz
    • 1
  • Marcin Butlewski
    • 2
  1. 1.Management and Computing SystemsPoznan University of TechnologyPoland
  2. 2.Ergonomics and Quality ManagementPoznan University of TechnologyPoland

Personalised recommendations