Advertisement

Studio-Based Learning as a Natural Fit to Teaching Human-Computer Interaction

  • Paula Alexandra Silva
  • Martha E. Crosby
  • Blanca J. Polo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8510)

Abstract

The creative element of HCI tends to be neglected due to the rapid advancement of hardware platforms as well as software development. HCI books cannot keep up with this rapid growth, nor can they provide students with the necessary tools to succeed. Considering these facts, HCI instructors need to implement techniques that not just complement but also enhance learning while preparing students for the real world. Studio-based learning, being a constructivist pedagogy that includes critiques and reflection can greatly enhance HCI Education.

Keywords

HCI Education HCI Pedagogy HCI Methodologies Studio-Based Learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ausubel, D.: Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Worth Publishers (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carter, A., Hundhausen, C.: A review of studio-based learning in computer science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 27(1), 105–111 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Docherty, M., Sutton, P., Brereton, M., Kaplan, S.: An innovative design and studio-based CS degree. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 33(1), 233–237 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Estey, A., Long, J., Gooch, B., Gooch, A.: Investigating studio-based learning in a course on game design. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hundhausen, C., Brown, J.: Designing, visualizing, and discussing algorithms within a CS 1 studio experience: An empirical study. Computers & Education 50(1), 301–326 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hundhausen, C., Fairbrother, D., Petre, M.: An Empirical Study of the “Prototype Walkthrough”: A Studio-Based Activity for HCI Education. ACM Transaction of Computer-Human Interaction 19(4), 1–36 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hundhausen, C., Fairbrother, D., Petre, M.: The prototype walkthrough”: a studio-based learning activity for the next generation of HCI education” (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lackney, J.: A history of the studio-based learning model. Mississippi State University: Education Design Institute (1999), http://www.edi.msstate.edu/work/pdf/history_studio_based_learning.pdf
  10. 10.
    Lave, J.: The practice of learning. In: Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, pp. 3–32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lebow, D.: Constructivist Values for Instructional Systems Design: Five Principles toward a New Mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(3), 4–16 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Preece, J., Rogers, J., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley and Son, NY (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reimer, Y., Douglas, S.: Teaching HCI design with the studio approach. Computer Science Education 13(3), 191–205 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rettig, M.: Prototyping for tiny fingers. Communications of the ACM 37(4), 21–27 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schon, D.: The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action, vol. 5126. Basic books (1983)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vygotsky, L.: Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winograd, T.: What can we teach about Human-computer interaction? In: Proceedings of the CHI 1990 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 443–449 (1990)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamer, J., Cutts, Q., Jackova, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., McCartney, R., Purchase, H., Riedesel, C., Saeli, M., Sanders, K., Sheard, J.: Contributing student pedagogy. SIGCSE Bull. 40(4), 194–212 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Emphasizing soft skills and team development in an educational digital game design course. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2009), pp. 240–247. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. In: Cross, N.: Developments in Design Methodology, Written Communication Value Rubric. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester (1984)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Written Communication Value Rubric (2009), http://manoa.hawaii.edu/mwp.htm (December 2010) (retrieved)
  22. 22.
    Contemporary Ethical Issues Rubric (2009), http://www.hawaii.edu/gened/cei/cei.htm (December 2010) (retrieved)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Alexandra Silva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martha E. Crosby
    • 1
  • Blanca J. Polo
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computer SciencesUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de Inovação Ciência e TecnologiaUniversidade Portucalense Infante D. HenriquePortoPortugal
  3. 3.Leeward Community CollegeUniversity of HawaiiPearl CityUSA

Personalised recommendations