Advertisement

Effects of Language Variety on Personality Perception in Embodied Conversational Agents

  • Brigitte Krenn
  • Birgit Endrass
  • Felix Kistler
  • Elisabeth André
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8511)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effects of language variety in combination with bodily behaviour on the perceived personality of a virtual agent. In particular, we explore changes on the extroversion-introversion dimension of personality. An online perception study was conducted featuring a virtual character with different levels of expressive body behaviour and different synthetic voices representing German and Austrian language varieties. Clear evidence was found that synthesized language variety, and gestural expressivity influence the human perception of an agent’s extroversion. Whereby Viennese and Austrian standard language are perceived as more extrovert than it is the case for the German standard.

Keywords

virtual agents personality extroversion-introversion language variety and non-verbal behaviour 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brebner, J.: Personality theory and movement. Individual differences in movement, pp. 27–41. MTP Press Limited (1985)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark, R., Richmond, K., King, S.: Multisyn voices from ARCTIC data for the Blizzard challenge. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, pp. 101–104 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell, A., Rushton, J.: Bodily communication and personality. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 17(1), 31–36 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damian, I., Endrass, B., Huber, P., Bee, N., André, E.: Individualized Agent Interactions. In: Allbeck, J.M., Faloutsos, P. (eds.) MIG 2011. LNCS, vol. 7060, pp. 15–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gärtig, A.-K., Plewnia, A., Rothe, A.: Wie Menschen in Deutschland über Sprache denken. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Repräsentativerhebung zu aktuellen Spracheinstellungen. amades - Arbeitspapiere und Materialien zur deutschen Sprache. Band 40. Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann Jr., W.B.: A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37, 504–528 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knapp, M.L., Hall, J.A.: Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Holt, Rinehart (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krenn, B., Schreitter, S., Neubarth, F., Sieber, G.: Social Evaluation of Artificial Agents by Language Varieties. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7502, pp. 377–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lippa, R.: The nonverbal display and judgement of extraversion, masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: A lens model analysis. Journal of Research in Personality (32), 80–107 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neff, M., Toothman, N., Bowmani, R., Fox Tree, J.E., Walker, M.A.: Don’t scratch! self-adaptors reflect emotional stability. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds.) IVA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6895, pp. 398–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neff, M., Wang, Y., Abbott, R., Walker, M.: Evaluating the Effect of Gesture and Language on Personality Perception in Conversational Agents. In: Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (eds.) IVA 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6356, pp. 222–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neubarth, F., Pucher, M., Kranzler, C.: Modeling Austrian dialect varieties for TTS. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2008), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1877–1880 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pucher, M., Neubarth, F., Strom, V., Moosmüller, S., Hofer, G., Kranzler, C., Schuchmann, G., Schabus, D.: Resources for speech synthesis of Viennese varieties. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Valletta, Malta, pp. 105–108 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pucher, M., Schabus, D., Yamagishi, J., Neubarth, F., Strom, V.: Modeling and interpolation of Austrian German and Viennese dialect in HMM-based speech synthesis. Speech Communication 52(2), 164–179 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Satow, L.: Big-Five-Persönlichkeitstest (B5T): Test- und Skalendokumentation (2012), http://www.drsatow.de

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigitte Krenn
    • 1
  • Birgit Endrass
    • 2
  • Felix Kistler
    • 2
  • Elisabeth André
    • 2
  1. 1.The Austrian Research Institute for Artificial IntelligenceViennaAustria
  2. 2.University of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations