Advertisement

Beyond Presentation - Employing Proactive Intelligent Agents as Social Catalysts

  • Madlen Wuttke
  • Michael Heidt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8511)

Abstract

Despite long standing attention from research communities, the technology of intelligent agents still harbours a large amount of unrealised potential. In this text, we argue that agent technology can benefit from a shift in focus from presentation to possible functionalities. In doing this, our focus is on the provision of pro-activity: The ability of agents not to merely react but to predictively shape their environments. In order to illustrate our arguments, we present an instance of interactive technology, showing how pro-active intelligent agents can be employed in exhibition contexts.

Keywords

Humanoid Robot Pedagogical Agent Facial Animation Museum Visitor Animated Pedagogical Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agada, R., Yan, J.: Research to Improve Communication by Animated Pedagogical Agents. J. Gener. Inf. Technol. 3, 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baylor, A.L., et al.: Interface Agents As Social Models: The Impact of Appearance on Females’ Attitude Toward Engineering. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 526–531. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baylor, A.L., Kim, S.: Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents: When less is more. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(2), 450–457 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baylor, A.L., Ryu, J.: The Effects of Image and Animation in Enhancing Pedagogical Agent Persona. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 28(4), 373–394 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breazeal, C.: Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 59(1-2), 119–155 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Craig, S.D., et al.: Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features and redundancy. J. Educ. Psychol. 94(2), 428–434 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heath, C., et al.: Crafting participation: Designing ecologies, configuring experience. Vis. Commun. 1(1), 9–33 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heidt, M., Kanellopoulos, K., Pfeiffer, L., Rosenthal, P.: Diverse Ecologies – Interdisciplinary Development for Cultural Education. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heidt, M.: Examining Interdisciplinary Prototyping in the Context of Cultural Communication. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8013, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, H.-H., et al.: Toward a multi-culture adaptive virtual tour guide agent with a modular approach. AI Soc. 24(3), 225–235 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kapoor, A., et al.: Fully automatic upper facial action recognition. In: IEEE International Workshop on Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures, AMFG 2003, pp. 195–202 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, Y., et al.: Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The impact of agent emotion and gender. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 23(3), 220–234 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, Y., Wei, Q.: The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment. Comput. Educ. 56(2), 505–514 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vom Lehn, D., et al.: Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collaboration in Museums and Galleries. Symb. Interact. 24(2), 189–216 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lepper, M.R., et al.: Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. Comput. Cogn. Tools. 1993, 75–105 (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lieberman, H., Selker, T.: Agents for the user interface. Handb. Agent Technol., 1–21 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lieberman, H., Selker, T.: Out of context: Computer systems that adapt to, and learn from, context. IBM Syst. J. 39(3.4), 617–632 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lusk, M.M., Atkinson, R.K.: Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21(6), 747–764 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mead, R., et al.: Recognition of spatial dynamics for predicting social interaction. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 201–202. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moreno, R., Flowerday, T.: Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 31(2), 186–207 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olsson, A., Ochsner, K.N.: The role of social cognition in emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12(2), 65–71 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Veletsianos, G.: How do learners respond to pedagogical agents that deliver social-oriented non-task messages? Impact on student learning, perceptions, and experiences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(1), 275–283 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Veletsianos, G.: The impact and implications of virtual character expressiveness on learning and agent–learner interactions. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 25(4), 345–357 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, N., et al.: The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 66(2), 98–112 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wuttke, M.: Pro-Active Pedagogical Agents. Int. Summerworkshop Comput. Sci. 2013(17), 59 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madlen Wuttke
    • 1
  • Michael Heidt
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Training Group crossWorlds, Faculty of HumanitiesChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany
  2. 2.Research Training Group crossWorlds, Faculty of InformaticsChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations