The Youth of Today Designing the Smart City of Tomorrow

Challenges to Future Mobility, Energy, and City Climate
  • Simon Himmel
  • Barbara S. Zaunbrecher
  • Wiktoria Wilkowska
  • Martina Ziefle
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8512)

Abstract

Sustainable energy supply, mobility concepts, a healthy city climate – the next generations will face vital urban challenges. The views of the citizens of tomorrow, today’s youth, are therefore especially important when designing concepts for future urban areas that incorporate those demands. We therefore explored young pupils’ attitude to these three research areas in an empirical approach. 21 students (17-24 years) participated in a workshop. First, they answered a questionnaire on their attitudes towards technology and urban environment. Afterwards, they were divided into focus groups in which they discussed and developed solutions to the three key challenges for future cities. Besides innovative ideas of how younger persons wish to live in urban environments, results reveal a rather uninformed and naïve view on the complex situation. Overall, we conclude that urban challenges should be integrated into the school education to provide a deeper understanding of the complex interaction of energy, mobility and user requirements.

Keywords

User diversity urban development attitude towards technology mobility energy city climate 

References

  1. 1.
    Himmel, S., Ziefle, M., Arning, K.: From Living Space to Urban Quarter: Acceptance of ICT Monitoring Solutions in an Ageing Society. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII/HCI 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8006, pp. 49–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arkesteijn, K., Oerlemans, L.: The early adoption of green power by Dutch households. Energy Policy 33, 183–196 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moula, E., Munjur, M., Maula, J., Hamdy, M., Fang, T., Jung, N., Lahdelma, R.: Researching social acceptability of renewable energy technologies in Finland. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cain, A.: Teenage Mobility in the United States: Issues and Opportunities for Promoting Public Transit. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1971, 140–148 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ardies, J., Maeyer, S.D., Gijbels, D.: Reconstructing the Pupils Attitude Towards Technology-survey. Des. Technol. Educ. Int. J. 18 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staat & Gesellschaft - educational background - Bildungsstand - Statistisches Bundesamt, Destatis (2013), https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/BildungForschungKultur/Bildungsstand/Tabellen/Bildungsabschluss.html
  7. 7.
    Mayring, P.: Combination and integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zaunbrecher, B.S., Kowalewski, S., Ziefle, M.: The Willingness to Adopt Technologies: A Cross-sectional Study on the Influence of Technical Self-efficacy on Acceptance (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiesura, A.: The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 68, 129–138 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kohlberg, L.: Development of moral character and moral ideology. Rev. Child Dev. Res. 1, 381–431 (1964)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crano, W.D.: Milestones in the psychological analysis of social influence. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 4, 68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Himmel
    • 1
  • Barbara S. Zaunbrecher
    • 1
  • Wiktoria Wilkowska
    • 1
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 1
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction CenterRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations