Advertisement

Mapping Graceful Interaction Design from Dance Performance

  • Nor Laila Md Noor
  • Wan Norizan Wan Hashim
  • Wan Adilah Wan Adnan
  • Fauzi Mohd Saman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8512)

Abstract

Graceful interaction is one of the several forms of aesthetic interaction that have been proposed to enrich the quality of user experience. In this paper we discuss the refinement of the concept of graceful interaction by mapping physical dance movement into graceful interaction. We argued that graceful interaction has deep roots in organic bodily rhythms and the social conditions which help structure them. To gain a further understanding of graceful interaction we compared physical dance movement with the conception of graceful interaction. We conducted a literature analysis on pertinent aesthetic concepts used in interface design, followed by an interview with an art performance expert to gain an understanding of pertinent graceful concepts in art performance. An interpretive analysis was then conducted to produce mappings of graceful interaction concepts from art performance to graceful interaction features based on an interaction quality framework.

Keywords

aesthetic experience movement interaction graceful interaction design HCI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tractinsky, N.: Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. In: CHI 1997 Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, March 22-27, pp. 115–122. ACM, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, Y.: Engineering Aesthetics and Ergo-Aesthetics: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering: Theory, Application and Practice, pp. 1–12 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norman, D.: Emotion and Design: Attractive Things Work Better. Interactions 9(4), 36–42 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diefenbach, S., Hassenzahl, M.: The Beauty Dilemma: Beauty is Valued but Discounted in Product Choice. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2009, pp. 1419–1426 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hashim, W.N.W., Noor, N.L.M., Adnan, W.: The Design of Aesthetic Interaction: Towards Graceful Interaction Framework. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, Korea, pp. 69–75 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hashim, W.N.W., Noor, N.L.M., Adnan, W.: A Framework for Graceful Interaction: Applying Laban Effort Theory to Define Graceful Movement Quality. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr 2010), Malaysia, pp, pp. 139–144 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright, P., Wallance, J., McCarthy, J.: Aesthetics and Experienced Centered Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15(4),18(1)–18(21) (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petersen, M.G., Iversen, O.S., Krogh, P.G., Ludvigsen, M.: Aesthetic Interaction: A Pragmatist’s Aesthetics of Interactive Systems. In: Benyon, D., Moody, P., Gruen, D., McAra-McWilliam, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 269–276. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dyas, D., Heylen, D.K.J., Eliens, A., Nijohlt, A.: Experiencing-in-the-world: Using Pragmatis Philosophy to Design Aesthetics Experience. In: Proceedings of the 2007, Conference on Designing for User Experience, Article No. 8, pp 1–16 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, P.: Theorizing the Relationship between Affect and Aesthetics in the ICT Design and Use Context. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Resources Management, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, May 21-23, pp. 1–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lavie, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing Dimensions of Perceived Visual Aesthetics of Web Sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60(3), 269–298 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monk, A.F., Lelos, K.: Changing only the aesthetic features of a domestic product can affect its apparent usability. In: Venkatesh, A., Gonzalvez, T., Monk, A., Buckner, B. (eds.) Home informatics and telematics: ICT for the next billion. Proceedings of HOIT 2007. IFIP, vol. 241, pp. 221–233. Springer, Boston (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Postman, N.: Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, Vintage (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bissell, D.: Virtual Infrastructures of Habit: The Changing Intensities of Habit through Gracefulness, restlessness and clumsiness. In: Cultural Geographies. Sage Publication (April 2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Friedman, B.: Value-sensitive Design. Interactions 3(6), 16–23 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hallnäs, L., Redström, J.: Slow Technology; Designing for Reflection. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 161–192 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross, P.R., Wensveen, S.A.G.: Designing Behavior in Interaction: Using Aesthetic Experience as a Mechanism for Design. International Journal of Design 4(2), 3–13 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vukadinović, M.: Aesthetic Experience and Emotional Identification, Art, Emotion and Value. In: 5th Mediterranean Congress of Aesthetics, pp. 393–408 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rahim, W.A., Noor, N.L.M., Mehad, S.: Towards a Theoretical Framework for Understanding Website Information Architecture. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Arab Conference, Yarmouk, Jordan (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin, Y.-C., Chang, H.-M., Liang, R.-H.: Designing Poetic Interaction in Space. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part III, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6763, pp. 559–568. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Majoe, D., Widmer, L., Guknecht, J.: Enhanced Motion Interaction for Multimedia Applications. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 14-16, pp. 13–19. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hwang, J., Kim, I.G., Kang, D., Ahn, S.C., Kim, H.: Motion-based Interaction for Mirror World in Mobile Devices. In: Proceedings of the HCI International, pp. 1–4 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacob, R.J.K.: The Use of Eye Movements in Human-Computer Interaction Techniques: what you look at is what you get. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) - Special Issue on Computer—Human Interaction 9(2), 152–169 (199)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lundgren, S., Bergström, K., Och Björk, S.: Exploring Aesthetic Ideals of Gameplay. . In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2009: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, London, September 1-4, pp. 1–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nijholt, A., van Dijk, B., Reidsma, D.: Design of Experience and Flow in Movement-Based Interaction. In: Egges, A., Kamphuis, A., Overmars, M. (eds.) MIG 2008. LNCS, vol. 5277, pp. 166–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pasch, M., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A.: Immersion in Movement-Based Interaction. In: Nijholt, A., Reidsma, D., Hondorp, H. (eds.) INTETAIN 2009. LNICST, vol. 9, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levinshon, A.: Designing for Movement Experience. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2011, Vancouver, Canada, May 7-12 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burnyeat, M.F.: Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, December 10-12. Harvard University (1997)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Segal, J.M.: Graceful Simplicity: The Philosophy and Politics of the Alternative American Dream, pp. 159–167. University of California Press (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hayes, P.J., Reddy, D.R.: Steps toward Graceful Interaction in Spoken and Written Man-Machine Communication. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 19(3), 231–284 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wiberg, M.: Graceful Interaction in Intelligent Environments. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Environments, Cambridge, April 5-7 (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Loke, L., Larsenn, A.T., Robertson, T.: Labanotation for Design of Movement-based Interaction. In: Proceedings of the Second Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment, Sydney, Australia, pp. 113–120 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alaoui, S.A., Caramiux, B., Serrano, M.: fzrom Dance to Touch: Movement Qualities for Interaction Design. In: Proceedings of CHI, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Overbeeke, C.J., Djajadiningrat, J.P., Hummels, C.C.M., Wensveen, S.A.G.: Beauty in Usability: Forget about Ease of Use! In: Green, W.S., Jordan, P.W. (eds.) Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability, pp. 9–18. Taylor & Francis (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bardzell, J.: Interaction Criticisms and Aesthetics. In: Proceedings of CHI2009, pp. 2357–2366 (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Olav, W., Bertelsen, O.W., Pold, S.: Criticism as an Approach to Interface Aesthetics. In: Proceedings of Nordic CHI 2004, pp. 23–32 (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Øritsland, T.A.: A Theory of Discursive Interaction Design. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim (1999)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dart, M.M.: Contra Dance Choreography - A Reflection of Social Change (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nor Laila Md Noor
    • 1
  • Wan Norizan Wan Hashim
    • 2
  • Wan Adilah Wan Adnan
    • 1
  • Fauzi Mohd Saman
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer and Mathematical SciencesUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human DevelopmentUniversiti Malaysia SarawakKuchingMalaysia

Personalised recommendations