Advertisement

Digital Love Letter: A Handwriting Based Interface for Non-instant Digital Messenger

  • So Jung Bang
  • Yoonji Song
  • Jae Dong Kim
  • Kiseul Suh
  • Chung-Kon Shi
  • Graham Wakefield
  • Sungju Woo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8512)

Abstract

The instant messenger has developed as an important communication media platform. However, because of the nature of instant communication, instant messenger services place many limitations on communicating with nuance. We believe that the easy nature of digital communications tends to weaken serious aspects of personal communication such as patience and commitment. On the basis of critical perspectives, we designed the digital messenger ‘Digital Love Letter’ (DLL)’: a mobile messenger in which the expressive process of interaction is more important than the final output. The main concept of DLL is to share the process of communication using a non-instantaneous and non-multitasking interface, so that users can share their time with some similar nuances to face-to-face communication. Both writing and reading messages require concentrated attention. Thus, this paper suggests a new system of digital messenger, that is also a new method of computer-mediated communication (CMC).

Keywords

Affective Messenger Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) Social Presence Instant Messaging 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Myerson, G.: Heidegger, Habermas and the Mobile Phone (Postmodern Encounters) (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turkle, S.: Can you hear me now. Forbes. com 5(7), 7 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kirn, W.: The autumn of the multitaskers. Atlantic Monthly, 66–80 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Picard, R.W.: Affective computing. MIT press (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wong, M.: Emotion assessment in evaluation of affective interfaces. Neuron 65(3), 293 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dourish, P., Finlay, J., Sengers, P., Wright, P.: Reflective HCI: Towards a critical technical practice. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1727–1728. ACM (April 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agre, P.: Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform Al. Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work. Beyond the Great Divide 131 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Konijn, E.A., Van Vugt, H.C.: Emotions in mediated interpersonal communication. Mediated Interpersonal Communication 100 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brave, S., Nass, C.: Emotion in human-computer interaction. The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, pp. 81–96 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riordan, M.A., Kreuz, R.J.: Emotion encoding and interpretation in computer-mediated communication: Reasons for use. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1667–1673 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Derks, D., Fischer, A.H., Bos, A.E.: The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior 24(3), 766–785 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hancock, J.T., Landrigan, C., Silver, C.: Expressing emotion in text-based communication. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 929–932. ACM (April 2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P.: Patterns of empathy in online communication. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 919–928. ACM (April 2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harris, R.B., Paradice, D.: An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 3(12), 2081–2090 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tu, C.H.: The impacts of text-based CMC on online social presence. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning 1(2), 1–24 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hwang, H.S., Lombard, M.: Understanding instant messaging: Gratifications and social presence. In: Proceedings of PRESENCE 2006, pp. 50–56 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hwang, Y.: Is communication competence still good for interpersonal media?: Mobile phone and instant messenger. Computers in Human Behavior 27(2), 924–934 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The social psychology of telecommunications (1976)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., Gregg, J.: The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. In: 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Philadelphia, PA (May 2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nowak, K.: Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation. In: Presence 2001 Conference, Philadelphia, PA (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shin, H., Lee, J., Park, J., Kim, Y., Oh, H., Lee, T.: A tactile emotional interface for instant messenger chat. In: Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4558, pp. 166–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neviarouskaya, A., Tsetserukou, D., Prendinger, H., Kawakami, N., Tachi, S., Ishizuka, M.: Emerging system for affectively charged interpersonal communication. In: ICCAS-SICE, pp. 3376–3381. IEEE (August 2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rovers, A.F., van Essen, H.: HIM: a framework for haptic instant messaging. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1313–1316. ACM (April 2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sundström, P., Ståhl, A., Höök, K.: In situ informants exploring an emotional mobile messaging system in their everyday practice. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(4), 388–403 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DiMicco, J.M., Lakshmipathy, V., Fiore, A.T.: Conductive Chat: Instant messaging with a skin conductivity channel. In: Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (November 2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fabri, M., Moore, D.J., Hobbs, D.J.: Empathy and enjoyment in instant messaging. In: Proceedings of 19th British HCI Group Annual Conference (HCI 2005), Edinburgh, UK, pp. 4–9 (September 2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lewis, J.R.: IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7(1), 57–78 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • So Jung Bang
    • 1
  • Yoonji Song
    • 1
  • Jae Dong Kim
    • 1
  • Kiseul Suh
    • 1
  • Chung-Kon Shi
    • 1
  • Graham Wakefield
    • 1
  • Sungju Woo
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Culture TechnologyKAISTDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations