Skip to main content

Modeling Student Benefit from Illustrations and Graphs

  • Conference paper
Book cover Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8474))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We examine a corpus of physics tutorial dialogues between a computer tutor and students. Either graphs or illustrations were displayed during the dialogues. In this work, stepwise linear regression, augmented to remove unwanted terms, is used to build models that identify situations when each graphic may aid learning. Our experimental results show that grouping students by pretest score, then by gender produces a model that significantly outperforms the baseline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aist, G., Kort, B., Reilly, R., Mostow, J., Picard, R.: Experimentally augmenting an intelligent tutoring system with human-supplied capabilities: adding human-provided emotional scaffolding to an automated reading tutor that listens. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 483–490 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arroyo, I., Beck, J.E., Park Woolf, B., Beal, C.R., Schultz, K.: Macroadapting animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 574–583. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chi, M., VanLehn, K., Litman, D.: Do micro-level tutorial decisions matter: Applying reinforcement learning to induce pedagogical tutorial tactics. ITS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D’Mello, S.K., Graesser, A.: Affect detection from human-computer dialogue with an intelligent tutoring system. In: Gratch, J., Young, M., Aylett, R., Ballin, D., Olivier, P. (eds.) IVA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4133, pp. 54–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ekstrom, R., French, J., Harman, H., Dermen, D.: Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.: Designing and evaluating a wizarded uncertainty-adaptive spoken dialogue tutoring system. Computer Speech & Language (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katz, S., Jordan, P., Litman, D., The Rimac Project Team: Rimac: A natural-language dialogue system that engages students in deep reasoning (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kohl, P.B., Finkelstein, N.D.: Student representational competence and self-assessment when solving physics problems. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M., Hegarty, M.: Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science 31(4), 549–579 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulik, C., Kulik, J., Bangert-Drowns, R.: Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 60(2), 265–299 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipschultz, M., Litman, D.: Illustrations or Graphs: Some Students Benefit From One Over the Other. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 746–749. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott, L., Rosenquist, M.: vanZee, E.: Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Exampies from kinematics. American Journal of Physics (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McNeil, N.M., Fyfe, E.R.: Concreteness fading promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 440–448 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meltzer, D.: Relation between students problem-solving performance and representational format. American Journal of Physics 73, 463 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rau, M., Aleven, V., Rummel, N.: Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. AIED (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Heuvelen, A., Zou, X.: Multiple representations of work–energy processes. American Journal of Physics 69, 184–194 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J., Shelby, R., Treacy, D., Wintersgill, M.: The andes physics tutoring system: Lessons learned. IJAIED (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lipschultz, M., Litman, D. (2014). Modeling Student Benefit from Illustrations and Graphs. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics