Identifying Thesis and Conclusion Statements in Student Essays to Scaffold Peer Review
Peer-reviewing is a recommended instructional technique to encourage good writing. Peer reviewers, however, may fail to identify key elements of an essay, such as thesis and conclusion statements, especially in high school writing. Our system identifies thesis and conclusion statements, or their absence, in students’ essays in order to scaffold reviewer reflection. We showed that computational linguistics and interactive machine learning have the potential to facilitate peer-review processes.
KeywordsPeer-review high school writing instruction discourse analysis natural language processing interactive machine learning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.National Center for Education Statistics, The Nation’s Report Card: Writing, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington, D.C. (2012)Google Scholar
- 3.Wooley, R., Was, C., Schunn, C., Dalton, D.: The effects of feedback elaboration on the giver of feedback. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2008)Google Scholar
- 4.Cho, K., Schunn, C.: Developing writing skills through students giving instructional explanations. In: Stein, Kucan (eds.) Instructional Explanations in the Disciplines. Springer, NY (2010)Google Scholar
- 5.Goldin, I.M., Ashley, K., Schunn, C.D.: Redesigning Educational Peer Review Interactions Using Computer Tools: An Introduction. Journal of Writing Research 4(2), 111–119 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Durst, R.: Cognitive and Linguistic Demands of Analytic Writing. Research in the Teaching of English 21(4), 347–376 (1987)Google Scholar
- 8.National Assessment of Educational Progress, Writing Framework for the, National Assessment of Educational Progress (2011)Google Scholar
- 15.Fails, J.A., Olsen Jr, D.R.: Interactive machine learning. In: Proceedings 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 39–45 (2003)Google Scholar
- 19.Marcu, D.: Discourse trees are good indicators of importance in text. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, 123–136 (1999)Google Scholar
- 20.Kakwani, N.: On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 437–446 (1980)Google Scholar
- 21.Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: Yale: Rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 935–940 (2006)Google Scholar