Skip to main content

To Quit or Not to Quit: Predicting Future Behavioral Disengagement from Reading Patterns

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8474))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This research predicted behavioral disengagement using quitting behaviors while learning from instructional texts. Supervised machine learning algorithms were used to predict if students would quit an upcoming text by analyzing reading behaviors observed in previous texts. Behavioral disengagement (quitting) at any point during the text was predicted with an accuracy of 76.5% (48% above chance), before students even began engaging with the text. We also predicted if a student would quit reading on the first page of a text or continue reading past the first page with an accuracy of 88.5% (29% above chance), as well as if students would quit sometime after the first page with an accuracy of 81.4% (51% greater than chance). Both actual quits and predicted quits were significantly related to learning, which provides some evidence for the predictive validity of our model. Implications and future work related to ITSs are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kelly, K.M., Heffernan, N., D’Mello, S., Namais, J., Strain, A.: Added Teacher-Created Motiational Video to an ITS. In: The Twenty-Sixth International FLAIRS Conference, pp. 503–508. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.: Affect detection: An interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Trans. on Affect. Comput. 1, 18–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pekrun, R., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L.: Academic emotions and student engagement. In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 259–282. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R.: Detecting student misuse of intelligent tutoring systems. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 531–540. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, J.E.: Using response times to model student disengagement. In: Proceedings of the ITS 2004 Workshop on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments, pp. 13–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Mello, S., Cobian, J., Hunter, M.: Automatic Gaze-Based Detection of Mind Wandering during Reading. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 364–365. International Educational Data Mining Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.: When does disengagement correlate with learning in spoken dialog computer tutoring? In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 81–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowe, J.P., McQuiggan, S.W., Robison, J.L., Lester, J.C.: Off-Task Behavior in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments. In: AIED, pp. 99–106 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jang, H.: Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. UMAP 2012 100, 798 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, R.S.J.: Modeling and understanding students’ off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1059–1068 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baker, R.S.J.d., et al.: Adapting to when students game an intelligent tutoring system. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 392–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Cocea, M., Weibelzahl, S.: Eliciting motivation knowledge from log files towards motivation diagnosis for Adaptive Systems. In: Conati, C., McCoy, K., Paliouras, G. (eds.) UM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4511, pp. 197–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cocea, M., Weibelzahl, S.: Disengagement Detection in Online Learning: Validation Studies and Perspectives. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4, 114–124 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker, R.S.J., Rossi, L.M.: Assessing the Disengaged Behaviors of Learners. Des. Recomm. Intell. Tutoring Syst. 155 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.C.: The half-life of cognitive-affective states during complex learning. Cogn. Emot. 25, 1299–1308 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., Weber, G.: ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. In: Lesgold, A.M., Frasson, C., Gauthier, G. (eds.) ITS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1086, pp. 261–269. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. McNamara, D.S., Levinstein, I.B., Boonthum, C.: iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 222–233 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Butler, H., Wallace, P., Graesser, A.C., Halpern, D.: Operation ARIES!: A serious game for teaching scientific inquiry. Serious Games Edutainment Appl., 169–195 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L.: Essentials of behavioral analysis: Methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K.: Question asking during tutoring. Am. Educ. Res. J. 31, 104–137 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, J., Goadrich, M.: The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 233–240 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker, R.S.J., De Carvalho, A.: Labeling student behavior faster and more precisely with text replays. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 38–47 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jang, H.: Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. J. Educ. Psychol. 100, 798 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mills, C., Bosch, N., Graesser, A., D’Mello, S. (2014). To Quit or Not to Quit: Predicting Future Behavioral Disengagement from Reading Patterns. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics