Advertisement

Understanding Wheel Spinning in the Context of Affective Factors

  • Joseph Beck
  • Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8474)

Abstract

The notion of wheel spinning, students getting stuck in the mastery learning cycle of an ITS without mastering the skill, is an emerging issue. Although wheel spinning has been analyzed, there has been little work in understanding what factors underlie it, and whether it occurs in cultural contexts outside that of the United States. This work analyzes data from 116 students in an urban setting in the Philippines. We found that Filipino students using the Scatterplot Tutor exhibited wheel spinning behaviors. We explore the impact of an intervention, Scooter the Tutor, on wheel spinning behavior and did not find that it had any effect. We also analyzed data from quantitative field observations, and found that wheel spinning is negatively correlated with flow, positively correlated with confusion, but not correlated with boredom. This result suggests that the problem of wheel spinning is primarily cognitive in nature, .and not related to student motivation. However, wheel spinning is positively correlated with gaming the system, so those constructs seem to be related.

Keywords

wheel spinning affect quantitative field observations gaming the system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frick, T.W.: A comparison of three decision models for adapting the length of computer-based mastery tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research 6(4), 479–513 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corbett, A., Anderson, J.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and user-Adapted Interaction 4, 253–278 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramon Magsaysay Cubao High School: School Profile Report, Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, R.S.J.d., et al: Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 392–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students “Game The System”. In: Proceedings of ACM: Computer Human Interaction (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Is More Practice Necessary? - Improving Learning Efficiency with the Cognitive Tutor through Educational Data Mining. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fancsali, S.E., Nixon, T., Ritter, S.: Optimal and Worst-Case Performance of Mastery Learning Assessment with Bayesian Knowledge Tracing. In: Proceedings of Educational Data Mining, pp. 35–42 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck, J.E., Gong, Y.: Wheel-spinning: student who fail to master a skill. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 431–440. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d., Agapito, J., Nabos, J., Repalam, M.C., Reyes, S.J., San Pedro, M.O.C.Z.: The effects of an embodied conversational agent on student affective dynamics while using an intelligent tutoring system. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 2(4), 18–37 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gong, Y., Beck, J.E., Heffernan, N.T., Forbes-Summers, E.: The Impact of Gaming (?) on Learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baker, R.S.J.d., DMello, S., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser: Better to be Frustrated than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners’ Cognitive-Affective States During Interactions with Three Different Computer-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 223–241 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Beck
    • 1
  • Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo
    • 2
  1. 1.Worcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.Ateneo Laboratory for the Learning Sciences, Department of Information Systems and, Computer ScienceAteneo de Manila UniversityQuezon CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations