Skip to main content

Decision Making Behavior of Earthquake Evacuees: An Application of Discrete Choice Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Numerical Methods for Reliability and Safety Assessment

Abstract

Destination choice modeling, after an earthquake, is challenging for the moderate seismic zones due to the shortage of evacuation data. Destination choice decisions are important for emergency planners to ensure the safety of evacuees, and to estimate the demand and specify the capacity of shelters. This study proposes a model for the behavior of evacuees in the aftermath of an earthquake using households as the unit of analysis. This study also considers heterogeneous mixtures of population in terms of income and ethnicity from different parts of the city. The Stated Preference (SP) method, using various hypothetical scenarios of shelter choice game in the event of a large earthquake, is applied to collect information on destination choices. Data were collected by e-mail back surveys, door-to-door surveys, and surveys in public places (e.g., at shopping malls, public parks, and student dormitories). This study proposes an error component model and a random coefficient model. The random coefficient models capture the heterogeneous responses of respondent while the error component model counts for correlations between destination choices. The results from the proposed disaggregate method are more comprehensive than those from the HAZUS method since it accounts for factors that impact decisions on destination choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M (1999) Discrete choice methods and their applications to short-term travel decisions. In: Hall RW (ed) Handbook of transportation science. Kluwer Academic, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Abou-Zeid M (2013) Stated preference (SP) methods-1, Discrete choice analysis: predicting demand and market shares. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Böersch-Supan A, Hajivassiliou V (1993) Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. J Economet 58(3): 347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownstone D, Train K (1998) Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. J Economet 89(1–2):109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SE, Pasion C, Yavari S, Elwood K (2009) Social impacts of lifeline losses: modeling displaced populations and health care functionality. Proceedings of the 2009 ASCE technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering conference, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash N, Gladwin H (2007) Evacuation decision making and behavioral responses: individual and household. Nat Hazards Rev 8(3):69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2003) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model HAZUS®MH MR4 technical manual. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu H, Wilmot CG (2004) Sequential logit dynamic travel demand model for hurricane evacuation. Trans Res B 1882:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J, Keane M, Runkle D (1994) Alternative computational approaches to inference in the multinomial probit model. Rev Econ Stat 76(4):609–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin H, Peacock WG (1997) Warning and evacuation: a night for hard houses. In: Morrow BH, Gladwin H (eds) Hurricane Andrew: gender, ethnicity and the sociology of disasters. Routledge, New York, pp 52–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Ukkusuri S, Gladwin H, Murray-Tuite P (2010) Behavioral model to understand household-level hurricane evacuation decision making. J Transp Eng 137(5):341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrald JR, Fouladi B, Al-Hajj SF (1992) Estimates of demand for mass care services in future earthquakes affecting the San Francisco Bay region. Prepared by George Washington University for the American Red Cross Northern California Earthquake Relief and Preparedness Project (NCERPP), 41pp. plus appendices

    Google Scholar 

  • Jillani S (2013) Pakistan earthquake: hundreds dead in Balochistan, BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24222760

  • Khatun A (2007). Personal interview with Haque A. June 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman FS, Bhat C (2006) A self-instructing course in mode choice modeling: multinomial and nested logit models, http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/courses/lm_draft_060131final-060630.pdf

  • Lindell MK, Lu JC, Prater CS (2005) Household decision making and evacuation in response to hurricane Lili. Nat Hazards Rev 6(4):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Claramunt C, Kung H-T, Guo Z, Wu J (2008) A decentralized and continuity-based algorithm for delineating capacitated shelters’ service areas. Environ Plann B 35(4):593–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa-Arango R, Samiul H, Ukkusuri SV, Murray-Tuite P (2013) Household-level model for hurricane evacuation destination type choice using hurricane ivan data. Nat Hazards Rev 14(1):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1978) Modeling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist A, Lunqvist L, Snickars F, Weibull J (eds) Spatial interaction theory and residential location. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D, Ruud P (1994) Estimation by simulation. Rev Econ Stat 76(4):591–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ 15(5): 447–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multidisciplinary Centre for Earthquake Engineering and Research (MCEER) (2008) Linking lifeline infrastructure performance and community disaster resilience: models and multi-stakeholder processes. Technical report MCEER-08-0004, MCEER, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Riad JK, Norris FH, Ruback RB (1999) Predicting evacuation in two major disasters: risk perception, social influence, and access to resources. J Appl Soc Psychol 29(5):918–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern S (1997) Simulation-based estimation. J Econ Lit 35(4):2006–2039

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamima U, Chouinard LE (2012) Framework for earthquake evacuation planning. J Leadership Manage Eng, ASCE 12(4):222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train EK (2009) Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JL (2001) Extended discrete choice models: integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables. Doctor of Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umma Tamima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tamima, U., Chouinard, L. (2015). Decision Making Behavior of Earthquake Evacuees: An Application of Discrete Choice Models. In: Kadry, S., El Hami, A. (eds) Numerical Methods for Reliability and Safety Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07167-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07167-1_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07166-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07167-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics