Abstract
The quickly growing presence of ideological groups on the Internet has garnered interest into how these groups use technology to persuade others. This study extends current research on the influential effects of website credibility and interactivity to the context of ideological group websites. Results of this study indicated that credibility and interactivity had direct and interactive effects on outcomes of agreement with the ideology, negative affective responses, and strength of argument when responding to the website. A number of these results may be due to (in)consistency with previous beliefs or violations of expectations regarding ideological group websites. Limitations and future directions are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ajzen, I.: Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Open University Press, Buckingham (2005)
Ajzen, I., Czasch, C., Flood, M.G.: From Intentions to Behavior: Implementation Intention, Commitment, and Conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 39, 1356–1372 (2009)
Allen, M.T., Angie, A.D., Davis, J.L., Byrne, C.L., O’Hair, H.D., Connelly, S., Mumford, M.D.: Virtual risk: The role of new media in violent and nonviolent ideological groups. In: Heath, R.L., O’Hair, H.D. (eds.) Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, pp. 446–470. Routledge, New York (2010)
Blazak, R.: White Boys to Terrorist Men: Target Recruitment of Nazi Skinheads. American Behavioral Scientist 44(6), 982–1000 (2001)
Campbell, D.E., Wright, R.T.: Shut-up I Don’t Care: Understanding the Role of Relevance and Interactivity on Customer Attitudes toward Repetitive Online Advertising. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 9(1), 62–76 (2008)
Chaiken, S., Maheswaran, D.: Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology 66(3), 460–473 (1994)
Chen, Q., Griffith, D.A., Shen, F.: The Effects of Interactivity on Cross-Channel Communication Effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Advertising 5(2), N.PAG (2005)
Chung, X., Zhao, X.: Effects of Perceived Interactivity on Web Site Preference and Memory: The Role of Personal Motivation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(1) (2004)
Danielson, D.R.: Web Credibility. In: Ghaoui, C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 713–721. Idea Group, Inc., Hershey (2005)
Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: The Role of Site Features, User Attributes, and Information Verification Behaviors on the Perceived Credibility of Web-Based Information. New Media & Society 9(2), 319–342 (2007)
Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. San Francisco (2003)
Gerstenfeld, P.B., Grant, D.R., Chiang, C.: Hate Online: A Content Analysis of Extremist Internet Sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP) 3(1), 29–44 (2003)
Ghose, S., Dou, W.: Interactive Functions and Their Impacts on the Appeal of Internet Presence Sites. Journal of Advertising Research 38(2), 29–43 (1998)
Glaser, J., Dixit, J., Green, D.P.: Studying Hate Crime with The Internet: What Makes Racists Advocate Racial Violence? Journal of Social Issues 58(1), 177–193 (2002)
Ha, L., James, E.L.: Interactivity Reexamined: A Baseline Analysis of Early Business Web Sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42(4), 457–474 (1998)
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H.: Communication and Persuasion; Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. Yale University Press, New Haven (1953)
Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W.: The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 15, 635–650 (1951)
Jensen, M.L., Dunbar, N.E., Connelly, S., Hughes, M.G., Taylor, W.D., Adame, B.J., Rozzell, B.L.: Social Media on Violent Ideological Group Websites. Paper presented at the 19th America’s Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, IL (August 2013)
Johnson, G.J., Bruner, G., Kumar, A.: Interactivity and Its Facets Revisited: Theory and Empirical Test. Journal Of Advertising 35(4), 35–52 (2006)
Kim, H., Stout, P.A.: The Effects of Interactivity on Information Processing and Attitude Change: Implications For Mental Health Stigma. Health Communication 25, 142–154 (2010)
Koenig, H.G., Büssing, A.: The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A Five-Item Measure For Use in Epidemiological Studies. Religions 1(1), 78–85 (2010)
Lee, E., Leets, L.: Persuasive Storytelling by Hate Groups Online Examining Its Effects on Adolescents. American Behavioral Scientist 45(6), 927–957 (2002)
Liu, Y.: Developing a Scale to Measure the Interactivity of Websites. Journal of Advertising Research 43(2), 207–216 (2003)
Liu, Y., Shrum, L.J.: What is Interactivity and is it always such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising 31, 53–64 (2002)
Liu, Y., Shrum, L.J.: A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects. Journal of Advertising 38(2), 53–68 (2009)
McCann, S.J.: Authoritarianism, Conservatism, Racial Diversity Threat, and the State Distribution of Hate Groups. The Journal of Psychology 144(1), 37–60 (2009)
McGinnies, E., Ward, C.: Better Liked than Right: Trustworthiness and Expertise as factors in Credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6, 467–472 (1980)
McCroskey, J.C.: Scales for the Measurement of Ethos. Speech Monographs 33, 65–72 (1966)
McCroskey, J.C., Teven, J.J.: Goodwill: A Reexamination of the Construct and Its Measurement. Communication Monographs 66(1), 90–103 (1999)
Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J., Medders, R.B.: Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online. Journal of Communication 60(3), 413–439 (2010)
Mumford, M.D., Bedell-Avers, K.E., Hunter, S.T., Espejo, J., Eubanks, D., Connelly, M.: Violence in Ideological and Non-Ideological Groups: A Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(6), 1521–1561 (2008)
Ohanian, R.: Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness. Journal of Advertising 19(3), 39–52 (1990)
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. W. C. Brown Co. Publishers, Dubuque (1981)
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Elaboration likelihood model. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 123–205. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando (1986)
Pornpitakpan, C.: The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades’ Evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34(2), 243–281 (2004)
Rafaeli, S.: Interactivity: From New Media to Communication. In: Hawkins, R.P., Wieman, J.M., Pingree, S. (eds.) Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, pp. 110–134. Sage, Newbury Park (1988)
Ray, J.J.: A Scale to Measure Conservatism of American Public Opinion. The Journal of Social Psychology 119(2), 293–294 (1983)
Ruch, F., Ruch, W.W.: Employee Aptitude Survey Technical Report. Psychological Services, Incorporated, Chicago, IL (1983)
Sohn, D., Ci, C., Lee, B.: The Moderating Effects of Expectation on the Patterns of the Interactivity-Attitude Relationship. Journal of Advertising 36(3), 109–119 (2007)
Stanton, J.J.: Terror in Cyberspace: Terrorists will Exploit and Widen the Gap Between Governing Structures and the Public. American Behavioral Scientist 45(6), 1017–1032 (2002)
Sundar, S.S.: Exploring Receivers’ Criteria for Perception of Print and Online News. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 76, 373–386 (1999)
Sundar, S.S.: Theorizing Interactivity’s Effects. Information Society 20(5), 385–389 (2004)
Sundar, S.S., Kim, J.: Interactivity and Persuasion: Influencing Attitudes with Information and Involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising 5(2), 5–58 (2005)
Tausch, N., Becker, J.C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., Siddiqui, R.N.: Explaining Radical Group Behavior: Developing Emotion and Efficacy Routes to Normative and Nonnormative Collective Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(1), 129 (2011)
Van Dijk, T.A.: Ideology and Discourse Analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11(2), 115–140 (2006)
Vigil, J.D.: Urban Violence and Street Gangs. Annual Review of Anthropology, 225–242 (2003)
Wilson, E.J., Sherrell, D.L.: Source Effects in Communication and Persuasion Research: A Meta-Analysis of Effect Size. Journal Of The Academy of Marketing Science 21(2), 101–112 (1993)
Wu, G.: Conceptualizing and Measuring the Perceived Interactivity of Websites. Journal Of Current Issues & Research In Advertising (CTC Press) 28(1), 87–104 (2006)
Yoon, K., Kim, C.H., Kim, M.S.: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effects of Source Credibility on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions. Mass Communication and Society 1, 153–173 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Johnson, G. et al. (2014). Credibility and Interactivity: Persuasive Components of Ideological Group Websites. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8462. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07126-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07127-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)