Skip to main content

The Great Moderation Under the Microscope: Decomposition of Macroeconomic Cycles in US and UK Aggregate Demand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wavelet Applications in Economics and Finance

Abstract

In this paper the relationship between the growth of real GDP components is explored in the frequency domain using both static and dynamic wavelet analysis. This analysis is carried out separately for both the US and the UK using quarterly data, and the results are found to be substantially different in the two countries. One of the key findings in this research is that the “great moderation” shows up only at certain frequencies, and not in all components of real GDP. We use these results to explain why the incidence of the great moderation has been so patchy across GDP components, countries and time periods. This also explains why it has been so hard to detect periods of moderation (or otherwise) reliably in the aggregate data. We argue it cannot be done without breaking the GDP components down into their frequency components across time and these results show why: the predictions of traditional real business cycle theory often appear not to be upheld in the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An analysis of fluctuations in real GNP itself has already been undertaken in Crowley (2010).

  2. 2.

    These are shocks from new investment which contains new technology rather than investment that either replaces depreciated equipment or just adds to the stock of existing capital without upgrading the technology.

  3. 3.

    Note that the vertical axes are scaled differently for each component.

  4. 4.

    In mathematics and, in particular, functional analysis, convolution is a mathematical operation on two functions f and g, producing a third function that is typically viewed as a modified version of one of the original functions. Convolution is similar to cross-correlation. It has applications that include statistics, computer vision, image and signal processing, electrical engineering, and differential equations.

  5. 5.

    But given that we seek the same resolution of cycles at different frequencies, this is still the most efficient way to estimate the crystals.

  6. 6.

    Given the previous footnote, it is obvious that by doing this, it will lead to “redundancy” as the wavelet coefficients have already been combined with most of the same datapoints.

  7. 7.

    One of the issues with spectral time-frequency analysis is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that the more certainty that is attached to the measurement of one dimension ( - frequency, for example), the less certainty can be attached to the other dimension ( - here the time location).

  8. 8.

    As Percival and Walden (2000) note, the MODWT is also commonly referred to by various other names in the wavelet literature such as non-decimated DWT, time-invariant DWT, undecimated DWT, translation-invariant DWT and stationary DWT. The term “maximal overlap” comes from its relationship with the literature on the Allan variance (the variation of time-keeping by atomic clocks)—see Greenhall (1991).

  9. 9.

    The MODWT was found superior to both the cosine packet transform and the short-time Fourier transform.

  10. 10.

    These can also be accessed online at: http://faculty.tamucc.edu/pcrowley/Research/frequency_domain_economics.html.

  11. 11.

    This also appears in GNP data as shown in Crowley (2010).

  12. 12.

    Separating automatic from discretionary fiscal policies in a cyclical environment is not an easy matter. Bernoth et al. (2013) review different methods, and show how it can be done by combining real time and ex-post data.

References

  • Aguiar-Conraria L, Soares M (2011) Business cycle synchronization and the euro: a wavelet analysis. J Macroecon 33(3):477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar-Conraria L, Martins M, Soares M (2012) The yield curve and the macro-economy across time and frequencies. J Econ Dyn Control 36(12):1950–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoth K, Hughes-Hallett A, Lewis J (2013) The cyclicality of automatic and discretionary fiscal policy: what can real time data tell us? Macroecon Dyn 5: 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce A, Gao HY (1996) Applied wavelet analysis with S-PLUS. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano L, Fitzgerald T (1998) The business cycle: it’s still a puzzle. Fed Reserve Bank Chic Econ Perspect 22:56–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley P (2007) A guide to wavelets for economists. J Econ Surv 21(2):207–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley P (2010) Long cycles in growth: explorations using new frequency domain techniques with US data. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper 6/2010, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley P, Lee J (2005) Decomposing the co-movement of the business cycle: a time-frequency analysis of growth cycles in the euro area. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper 12/05, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlanetto F, Seneca M (2010) Investment-specific technology shocks and consumption. Norges Bank Discussion Paper 30-2010, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallegati M, Gallegati M (2007) Wavelet variance analysis of output in G-7 countries. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econ 11(3):1435–1455

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallegati M, Gallegati M, Ramsey J, Semmler W (2011) The US wage phillips curve across frequencies and over time. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 73:489–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gençay R, Selçuk F, Whicher B (2001) An introduction to wavelets and other filtering methods in finance and economics. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhall C (1991) Recipes for degrees of freedom of frequency stability estimators. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 40:994–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King R, Plosser C, Rebelo S (1988) Production, growth and business cycles i: the basic neoclassical model. J Monet Econ 21:195–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampart C, Ramsey J (1998) Decomposition of economic relationships by timescale using wavelets. Macroecon Dyn 2(1):49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival D, Mofjeld H (1997) Analysis of subtidal coastal sea level flusctuations using wavelets. J Am Stat Assoc 92:868–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percival D, Walden A (2000) Wavelet methods for time series analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo S (2005) Real business cycle models: past, present and future. Scand J Econ 107(2):217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shensa M (1992) The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the à trous and mallat algorithms. IEEE Trans Signal Process 40:2464–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walden A, Cristan C (1998) The phase-corrected undecimated discrete wavelet packet transform and its application to interpreting the timing of events. Proc R Soc Lond Math Phys Eng Sci 454(1976):2243–2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yogo M (2008) Measuring business cycles: a wavelet analysis of economic time series. Econ Lett 100(2):208–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was completed while Crowley was visiting the School of Public Policy at George Mason University in Fairfax, VA, USA during the fall of 2009. Dean Kingsley Haynes should be thanked for hosting Crowley at George Mason University in 2009 and Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi is acknowledged for providing faculty development leave funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick M. Crowley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crowley, P.M., Hallett, A.H. (2014). The Great Moderation Under the Microscope: Decomposition of Macroeconomic Cycles in US and UK Aggregate Demand. In: Gallegati, M., Semmler, W. (eds) Wavelet Applications in Economics and Finance. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07061-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics