Skip to main content

DEA Modeling for Efficiency Optimization of Indian Banks with Negative Data Sets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Operations Research Proceedings 2013

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

  • 1566 Accesses

Abstract

Indian banking has experienced exponential growth after reforms of 1990s that helped to improve the profitability, performance and efficiency. However, still there are conflicting concerns of operating efficiency and risk management across the major bank categories particularly after the global financial crisis. We have used Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for measuring the efficiency of a set of decision making units (DMUs) which traditionally assumes that all the input and output values are non-negative. Quantitative measures of bank performance like net profits, growth rates and default portfolios frequently show negative values for output variables. We draw motivation from some studies done in other developing countries for handling the negative data sets. We cross examine the approaches for dealing with variables that are positive for some DMUs and negative for others and test the validity of Range Directional Measure Model (RDM) for examining cases when some inputs and/or outputs can take negative as well as positive values. We find some support for the RDM in handling data negative sets without the need for any transformation (conversion of the negative values with small positive values) as a measure of efficiency akin to the radial measures in traditional DEA. Our preliminary investigation indicates no significant difference between the operational efficiency and profitability of public and private banks modeled for negative data and undesirable output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alirezaee, H., & van de Panne, C. (1998). Sampling size and efficiency bias in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 21, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avkiran, N. K. (1999). An application reference for data envelopment analysis: Helping the novice researcher. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17, 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avkiran, N. K. (1999). The evidence on efficiency gains: The role of mergers and the benefits to the public. Journal Banking & Finance, 23, 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Avkiran, N. K. (2000). Rising productivity of Australian trading banks under deregulation. Journal of Economics and Finance, 24, 122–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, 895–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharyya, A., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (1997). Changes in economic regime and productivity growth: A study of Indian public sector banks. Journal of Comparative Economics, 25, 196–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C. A. K., & Sahay, P. (1997). The impact of liberalisation on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhoades, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operations Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das, A., Nag, A., Ray, S.C. (2004). Liberalization, ownership, and efficiency in Indian banking: A nonparametric approach. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Connectcut.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert, R., & Wilson, P. (1998). Effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 133–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giokas, D. (1991). Bank branch operating efficiency: A comparative application of DEA and the log linear model. Omega, 19(6), 549–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Golany, B., & Storbeck, J. E. (1999). A data envelopment analysis of the operational efficiency of bank branches. Interfaces, 29(3), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kantor, J., & Maital, S. (1999). Measuring efficiency by product group: Integrating DEA with activity-based accounting in a large Mideast bank. Interfaces, 29(3), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leightner, J., & Lovell, C. (1998). The impact of financial liberalisation on the performance of Thai banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mukherjee, A., Nath, P., & Pal, M. N. (2002). Performance benchmarking and strategic homogeneity of Indian banks. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 20(3), 122–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pastor, J., & Ruiz, J. (2007). Variables with negative values in DEA. In J. Zhu & W. Cook (Eds.), Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (pp. 63–84). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Portela, M., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). A directional distance approach to deal with negative data in DEA. Journal of Operational Research Society, 55(10), 111–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saha, A., & Ravishankar, T. S. (2000). Rating of Indian commercial banks: A DEA approach. European Journal of Operations Research, 124, 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sathye, M. (2001). X-efficiency in Australian banking: An empirical investigation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 613–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sathye, M. (2002). Measuring productivity changes in Australian banking: An application of Malmquist indices. Managerial Finance, 28, 48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherman, D. H., & Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(3), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sturm, J., Williams, B. (2002). Deregulation, entry of foreign banks and bank efficiency in Australia. CESifo Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Kumar Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gupta, P.K., Garg, S. (2014). DEA Modeling for Efficiency Optimization of Indian Banks with Negative Data Sets. In: Huisman, D., Louwerse, I., Wagelmans, A. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2013. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07001-8_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics