Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 1746 Accesses

Abstract

Gartner suggested that 80 % of organizational data is unstructured and has not been made available to the users. As a result, most organizations have far more data than they possibly use, yet at the same time, they do not have the quality data they really need. With the participation of an Australian Power Utility Company, this research demonstrated the value of unstructured data found in the plant incident reports (which are Word documents stored in the public directory of the exchange server) by conducting text analysis with special in-house-developed software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ballou DP, Pazer HL (1995) Designing information systems to optimize the accuracy-timeliness tradeoff. Inf Syst Res 6(1):51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eerens E (2003) Business driven asset management for industrial & infrastructure assets Australia. Le Clochard

    Google Scholar 

  3. English LP (1999) Improving data warehouse and business information quality: methods for reducing costs and increasing profits. Willey, NY

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gao J, Koronios A, Lin S (2006) Data quality in engineering asset management organisations—Current picture in Australia. In: The international conference of information quality, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. IPWEA (2002) International infrastructure management manual Australia/New Zealand Edition

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein BD, Goodhue DL, Davis GB (1997) Can humans detect errors in data? Impact Base Rates Incentives Goals MIS Q 21(2):169–194

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kriebel CH (1979) Evaluating the quality of information systems. In: Szysperski N, Grochla E (eds) Design and implementation of computer based information systems, Sijthroff and Noordhoff, Germantown

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levitan AV, Redman TC (1998) Data as a resource: properties implications and prescriptions. Sloan Manag Rev 40(1):89–101

    Google Scholar 

  9. Orr K (1998) Data quality and system theory. Commun ACM 41(2):66–71

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Shanks G, Darke P (1998) Understanding data quality in a data warehouse. Aust Comput J 30(4):122–128

    Google Scholar 

  11. Snitkin S (2003) Collaborative asset lifecycle management vision and strategies. Research Report ARC Advisory Group, Dedham

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sokianos N, Druke H, Toutatoui C (1998) Lexikon productions management. Landsberg

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spires C (1996) Asset and maintenance management—becoming a boardroom issue. Managing Serv Q 6(3):13–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steed JC (1988) Aspects of how asset management can be influenced by modern condition monitoring and information management systems. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steenstrup K (2005) Enterprise asset management thrives on data consistency. Gartner Research Article

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strong DM (1997) IT process designs for Improving Information Quality and reducing exception handling: a simulation experiment. Inf Manag 31:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Strong DM, Lee YW, Wang RY (1997) Data quality in context. Commun ACM 40:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang RY, Kon HB (1993) Toward total data quality management (TDQM). In: Wang RY (eds) Information technology in action: trends and perspectives. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang RY, Strong DM (1996) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manage Inf Syst 12(4):5–33

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was developed within the CRC for Infrastructure and Engineering Asset Management, established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the CRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Gao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gao, J., Koronios, A. (2015). Unlock the Value of Unstructured Data in EAM. In: Lee, W., Choi, B., Ma, L., Mathew, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2012). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06966-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06966-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02461-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06966-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics