Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Avoiding the Overhead Cost Trap: Towards an Advanced Management Accounting Method for Servitized Firms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Servitization in Industry

Abstract

During the process of servitization, industrial companies may become lured into an overhead cost trap, meaning that costs for service delivery are invoiced not directly but indirectly by the product price, which leads to an overpriced product on the one hand and inferior service delivery on the other. This cost trap diminishes the competitiveness of the product and results in an underdeveloped service business. Therefore, this chapter develops several management accounting methods for service offerings to help manufacturers avoid the overhead cost trap. In addition to traditional methods, such as life cycle costing, more advanced accounting methods on the service business (e.g., function point analysis) and firm (e.g., balanced scorecard) levels are adapted to the needs of servitized manufacturers. In summary, this chapter aims to present suitable management accounting methods and thereby support manufacturers in professionalising their service businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barringer, H. P. (2003). Life cycle cost and good practices. NPRA Maintenance Conference, San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biege, S., Gotsch, M., & Zanker, C. (2012). Anforderungen für Produktivitätsmessungen bei innovativen und wissensintensiven Unternehmensdienstleistungen. In O. Thomas & M. Nüttgens (Hrsg.), Dienstleistungsmodellierung (pp. 142–168). Berlin Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, B. S. (2004). Logistics engineering and management (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., & Sterner, E. (2000). Reconciling theory and practice of life-cycle costing. Building Research and Information, 28(5/6), 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzeck, J. (1997). Methodik der Lebenszykluskostenanalyse und -planung (life cycle costing) für die Entwicklung technischer Produktsysteme unter Berücksichtigung umweltlicher Einflüsse, Institut für Kunststoffprüfung und Kunststoffkunde der Universität Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Ojasalo, K. (2004). Service productivity: Toward a conceptualisation of the transformation of inputs into customer value in services. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, P., & Kaufmann, L. (1998). Balanced Scorecard—ein Werkzeug zur Umsetzung von Strategien. Harvard Business Manager, 5, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. W., & Ostrom, L. L. (1980). Life cycle costing in industrial purchasing. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 16(4), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–79 (January - February 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). Balanced scorecard—translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemminer, J. (1999). Lebenszyklusorientiertes Kosten- und Erlösmanagement. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kinkel, S. (2003a). Produktbegleitende Dienstleistungen – Herausforderungen für das Controlling. In S. Kinkel, P. Jung Erceg & G. Lay (Hrsg.), Controlling produktbegleitender Dienstleistungen (pp. 1–12). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinkel, S. (2003b). Die Balanced Scorecard als Instrument zum integrierten Nutzen- und Aufwandcontrolling produktbegleitender Dienstleistungen, In S. Kinkel, P. Jung Erceg & G. Lay (Hrsg.): Controlling produktbegleitender Dienstleistungen (pp. 111–130). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kralj, D. (1999). Lebenszyklus, Lebenszykluskosten und Lebenszykluskos tenrechnung. Controlling, 11(4/5), 227–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, G., Copani, G., Jäger, A., & Biege, S. (2010). The relevance of service in European manufacturing industries. Journal of Service Management, 21(5), 715–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lay. G., & Radermacher, E. (2005). Life-cycle-costing-tool als Instrument zur Kosten-/Nutzen-Betrachtung produktbegleitender Dienstleistungen. In G. Lay & M. Nippa (Eds.), Management produktbegleitender Dienstleistungen—Konzepte und Praxisbeispiele für Technik, Organisation und Personal in serviceorientierten Industriebetrieben (S. 85–97). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, C., & Gotsch, M. (2013). Dienstleistungsproduktivität in der Industrie—Neue Methode zur Unterstützung eines effizienten Kundendienstes. wt Werkstattstechnik, 7(8), 560–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, C., Weissfloch, U., & Kinkel, S. (2010). Surplus of service-based business models—the integration of multiple perspectives for assessing win-win potentials. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics, 5(4), 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerch, C. (2010). Internationalisierung hybrider Produkte – Bewertungssystem für den Export innovativer Dienstleistungen von Industrieunternehmen. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, R. T. (1978). Life-cycle costing: A business and societal instrument. Management Review, 67(4), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemand, S. (1996). Target costing für industrielle. München: Dienstleistungen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, W., & Bischof, P. (1975). Überleben durch Produktplanung auf der Basis von Produktlebenszyklen. FB/IE, 24, 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poensgen, B. (2012). Function-point-analyse. Ein Praxishandbuch. 2. Auflage. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, G. W. (1989). Im Servicezyklus steckt Profit. Harvard Manager, 2, 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, G., Speth, C., & Schwenk, U. (1999). Controlling industrieller Dienstleistungen – Mit der Service-Scorecard die eigenen Dienstleistungen bewerten und strategisch steuern. IO Management, 11, 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., & Darnian, A. (1999). Preispolitik für industrielle Dienstleistungen. In H. Corsten & H. Schneider (Hrsg.), Wettbewerbsfaktor Dienstleistung (pp. 157–189). München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangen, S. (2004). Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. B. (1981). The use of life cycle costing in acquiring physical assets. Long Range Planning, 14(6), 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B., & Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E. (2012). Servitization: The extent and motivations for service provisions amongst UK manufacturers. Proceedings DRUID, Denmark, 19–21 Juni 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., & Schäffer, U. (2000). Einführung der Balanced Scorecard – 8 Erfolgsfaktoren (pp. 3–7). Januar: Controller Magazin.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. E., & Ostwald, P. H. (1976). Life cycle costing. Management Accounting, 57(7), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D. G. (1997). Life cycle costing—theory, information acquisition and application. International Journal of Project Management, 15(6), 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurl, H.-J., & Mayer, J. (2000). Gestaltungskonzept für Erfolgsfaktoren-basierte balanced scorecards. Zeitschrift für Planung, 11, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Breslauer Straße 48, 76139, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Christian Lerch & Matthias Gotsch

Authors
  1. Christian Lerch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Gotsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Lerch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Gunter Lay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lerch, C., Gotsch, M. (2014). Avoiding the Overhead Cost Trap: Towards an Advanced Management Accounting Method for Servitized Firms. In: Lay, G. (eds) Servitization in Industry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06935-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06935-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06934-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06935-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation