Skip to main content

Developing Lean Architecture Governance at a Software Developing Company Applying ArchiMate Motivation and Business Layers

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 424))

Abstract

The work presents a lean approach of architecture development at a software development company. In this paper, a meta-model of the ORRCA methodology of IT architecture development is described. The methodology approach is used to support the architecture development and maintenance at a software development company by proposing a solution including processes, repositories, organizational structures, etc. The meta-model considered here is based on the motivation layer and business layers described in the ArchiMate notation. For a practical model verification, all six ArchiMate standard viewpoints for modeling ORRCA motivational aspects are used. The proposed meta-model applies to the development of software systems, for which bridging to business goals is essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bente, S., Bombosch, U., Langade, S.: Collaborative Enterprise Architecture: Enriching EA with Lean, Agile, and Enterprise 2.0 Practices. Morgan Kaufmann (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eeles, P., Cripps, P.: The Process of Software Architecting. Addison Wesley Professional (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goczyła, K., Piotrowski, P.: Application of knowledge views. Studia Informatica 31(2A), 77–88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9.1, p. 692 (2009-2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Open Group: ArchiMate 2.0 Specification, p. 183 (2009-2012), http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate2-doc/toc.html

  6. ISO/IEC/IEEE: Systems and software engineering – architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E) (Revision of ISO/IEC 42010:2007 and IEEE Std 1471-2000, pp. 1–46 (January 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knoernschild, K.: Java Application Architecture: Modularity Patterns with Examples Using OSGi. Robert C. Martin Series. Pearson Education (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Enterprise engineering series. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meertens, L., Iacob, M., Jonkers, H., Quartel, D., Nieuwenhuis, L., van Sinderen, M.: Mapping the business model canvas to archimate. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1694–1701. ACM (March 2012), http://doc.utwente.nl/82858/

  10. Morien, R.: Agile management and the toyota way for software project management. In: 3rd International Conference on Industrial Informatics, pp. 516–522 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osterwalder, A.: The Business Model Ontology: a proposition in a design science approach. Dissertation, Université de Lausanne, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pena, C., Villalobos, J.: An mde approach to design enterprise architecture viewpoints. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology (CEC 2005), pp. 80–87 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poppendieck, M., Poppendieck, T.: Implementing Lean Software Development: From Concept to Cash. A Kent Beck signature book, Addison Wesley Professional (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rogus, G., Skrzyński, P., Szwed, P., Turek, M., Werewka, J.: SMESDaD – synergetyczna metodyka rozwijania i wdrażania oprogramowania korporacyjnego. Pomiary, Automatyka, Robotyka R 15(12), 196–209 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture: Working with Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives. Addison-Wesley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, K., Graves, T.: An Introduction to Peaf: Pragmatic Enterprise Architecture Framework. Pragmatic EA, Limited (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steindl, C.: Lean software development, ibm corporation, p. 65. IT Architect and IT Specialist Institute Central Region in Herrenberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Szwed, P., Skrzynski, P., Rogus, G., Werewka, J.: Ontology of architectural decisions supporting atam based assessment of soa architectures. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 287–290. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Werewka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Werewka, J., Jamróz, K., Pitulej, D. (2014). Developing Lean Architecture Governance at a Software Developing Company Applying ArchiMate Motivation and Business Layers. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds) Beyond Databases, Architectures, and Structures. BDAS 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 424. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06932-6_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06932-6_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06931-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06932-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics