Skip to main content

Transgenic Crops and Food Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plant Biotechnology

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the potential role of transgenic crops or genetically modified (GM) crops in enhancing food security. This chapter argues that although GM crops are still in their early states of adoption, emerging trends show their potential to contribute to food security. The crops have the potential to increase agricultural productivity on existing arable land; address issues of loss related to pests, disease, and drought; increase access to food through income gains; raise nutrition levels; and promote sustainable agriculture. But realizing the potential needs to be assessed in a non-deterministic, system-wide economic context. A key message is to view the role of GM technology as one of the many factors that influence food security whose contribution should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Different studies used different methods for calculating income gain from Bt cotton, but all indicated significantly higher profit margins for Bt cotton farmers (Pray et al. 2011, pp. 99–100).

  2. 2.

    The three varieties planted in India, Bangladesh, and the Philippines include Swarna Sub1, Samba Mahsuri, and IR64-Sub1, respectively (IRRI n.d.)

References

  • Adenle AA, Morris EJ, Parayil G (2013) Status of development, regulation, and adoption of GM agriculture in Africa: view and positions of stakeholder groups. Food Policy 43:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belay M, Nyambura R (2013) GM crops won’t help African farmers. Guardian Poverty Matters blog (blog).. http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/jun/24/gm-crops-african-farmers. Accessed 1 Nov 2013

  • Brookes G, Barfoot P (2013) The global income and production effects of genetically modified (GM) crops 1996–2011. GM Crops Food Biotechnol Agric Food Chain 4(1):74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S (2009) Filipino farmers welcome new rice varieties. IRRI (media release),4 June. http://irri.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=8151&Itemid=100588&lang=en. Accessed 1 Nov 2013

  • Dill GM, Cajacob CA, Padgette SR (2008) Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations. Pest Manag Sci 64(4):326–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades GO (2013) Progress in achieving and delivering drought tolerance in Maize—an update. ISAAA, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering L (2012) FEATURE-‘Green bullet’ innovations aim to feed world of 9 billion. Reuters

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Estrella LR (2000) Genetically modified crops and developing countries. Plant Physiol 124(3):923–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Pray C, Rozelle S (2002) Enhancing the crops to feed the poor. Nature 418:678–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • International Rice Research Center (IRRI) (n.d) Climate change-ready rice (Online briefing). Available at http://irri.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=9148&lang=en. Accessed 1 Nov 2013

  • International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) (2013) Global biotech/GM crop plantings increase 100-fold from 1996; developing countries, including new adopters Sudan and Cuba, now dominate use of the technology. ISAAA brief no. 44 (press release), 20 February. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/44/pressrelease/. Accessed 1 Nov 2013

  • James C (2013) Executive summary. In: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2012. ISAAA brief no. 44. ISAAA, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • James C (2014a) Executive summary. In: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2013, ISAAA brief no. 46. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • James C (2014b) ISAAA brief 46-2013: slides & tables. 2013 ISAAA report on Global status of Biotech/GM Crops, February 2014. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/46/pptslides/default.asp

  • Juma C (2011a) The new harvest: agricultural innovation in Africa. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Juma C (2011b) Preventing hunger: biotechnology is key. Nature (479)

    Google Scholar 

  • Juma C, Conceição P, Levine S (2014) Biotechnology and food security. In: Smyth S, Phillips PWB, Castle D (eds) Handbook on agriculture, biotechnology and development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathage J, Qaim M (2012) Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(29):11652–11656

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D (2013) An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit Rev Biotechnol (published early online 23 September). http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Nicolia-20131.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2013

  • Normile D (2008) Reinventing rice to feed the world. Science 18:330–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pray CE, Nagarajan L, Huang J, Hu R, Ramaswami B (2011) Chapter 4: The impact of Bt cotton and the potential impact of biotechnology on other crops in China and India. In: Carter CA, Moschini G, Sheldon I (eds) Frontiers of economics and globalization, vol 10. Emerald, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaim M, Kouser S (2013) Genetically modified crops and food security. PLoS One 8(6):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronald P (n.d) New flood-tolerant rice offers relief for world’s poorest farmers. Ronald Laboratory, University of California at Davis (press release). Available at http://indica.ucdavis.edu/news/new-flood-tolerant-rice-offers-relief-for-worlds. Accessed 1 Nov 2013

  • Sexton S, Zilberman D (2011) How agricultural biotechnology boosts food supply and accommodates biofuels. NBER working paper no. 16699. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2009) Declaration of the World summit on food security. Rome, 16–18 November. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/Meeting/018/k6050e.pdf

  • Vitale JD (2010) The commercial application of GMO crops in Africa: Burkina Faso’s decade of experience with Bt cotton. AgBioforum 13(4):320–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Wamboga P (2011) Vitamin A and iron-rich bananas under trial in Uganda. Biovision 16 (newsletter). Available at http://www.biovisioneastafrica.com/publications/Biovision-16.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2013

  • Zilberman D, Sexton SE, Marra M, Fernandez-Cornejo J (2010) The economic impact of genetically engineered crops. Choices 25(2):1–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calestous Juma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Juma, C., Gordon, K. (2014). Transgenic Crops and Food Security. In: Ricroch, A., Chopra, S., Fleischer, S. (eds) Plant Biotechnology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06892-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics