Abstract
Linus’ Law reflects on a key characteristic of open source software development: developers’ tendency to closely work together in the bug resolution process. In this paper we empirically examine Linus’ Law using a data-set of 1,000+ Android bugs, owned by 70+ developers. Our results indicate that encouraging developers to work closely with one another has nuanced implications; while one form of contact may help reduce bug resolution time, another form can have quite the opposite effect. We present statistically significant evidence in support of our results and discuss their relevance at the individual and organizational levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Raymond, E.S.: The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly (2001)
Shaw, M.: Continuing prospects for an engineering discipline of software. IEEE Software 26, 64–67 (2009)
Guana, V., Rocha, F., Hindle, A., Stroulia, E.: Do the stars align? multidimensional analysis of android’s layered architecture. In: 2012 9th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 124–127 (2012)
Meneely, A., Williams, L.: Secure open source collaboration: An empirical study of linus’ law. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 453–462 (2009)
Meneely, A., Williams, L.: Strengthening the empirical analysis of the relationship between linus’ law and software security. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2010, pp. 9:1–9:10. ACM, New York (2010)
Glass, R.L.: Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering. Addison Wesley Professional, Pearson Education [distributor], Boston, Old Tappan (2002)
Wang, J., Carroll, J.M.: Behind linus’s law: A preliminary analysis of open source software peer review practices in mozilla and python. In: 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), pp. 117–124. IEEE (May 2011)
Shihab, E., Kamei, Y., Bhattacharya, P.: Mining challenge 2012: The android platform. In: The 9th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (2012)
Conway, M.: How do committees invent?. Datamation Journal, 28–31 (April 1968)
Jeong, G., Kim, S., Zimmermann, T.: Improving bug triage with bug tossing graphs. In: ESEC/FSE 2009, pp. 111–120. ACM, New York (2009)
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. M. L. R. (March 2003)
Steyvers, M., Griffiths, T.: Probabilistic topic models. In: Latent Semantic Analysis: A Road to Meaning. Lawrence Erlbaum (2007)
Falessi, D., Cantone, G., Canfora, G.: Empirical principles and an industrial case study in retrieving equivalent requirements via natural language processing techniques. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 39(1), 18–44 (2013)
Kullback, S., Leibler, R.A.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(1), 79–86 (1951)
Albert, R., Barabasi, A.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Cond-mat/0106096 (June 2001); Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 47 (2002)
Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L.: Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education, Boston (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Datta, S., Sarkar, P., Das, S., Sreshtha, S., Lade, P., Majumder, S. (2014). How Many Eyeballs Does a Bug Need? An Empirical Validation of Linus’ Law. In: Cantone, G., Marchesi, M. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 179. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06862-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06862-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06861-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06862-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)