Abstract
The paper examines the relationship between future teachers’ professional motivation and their beliefs on the dynamic nature of mathematics as an academic discipline as well as on their transmission-oriented beliefs on the teaching and learning of mathematics. As motives, intrinsic-pedagogical, intrinsic-academic and extrinsic motives were examined. Based on IEA’s “Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics” (TEDS-M), carried out in 2008, we analyzed data from two Western (Germany, Norway) and two East Asian countries (Singapore, Taiwan) which represent different educational cultures. Our results revealed that the level of the motivational facets and the beliefs facets differed between the four countries. The pattern of relationships between professional motivation and teacher beliefs was largely similar across countries though. This result indicates a generic effect of motivation but culturally shaped strength of the different characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andrews, P., Diego-Mantecón, J., Vankúš, P., & Op’t Eynde, P. (2011). Construct consistency in the assessment of students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A three-way cross-sectional pilot comparative study. Acta Didactica Universitatis Comenianae – Mathematics, 11, 1–25.
Benware, C., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765.
Blömeke, S. (2012). Content, professional preparation and teaching methods: How diverse is teacher education across countries? Comparative Education Review, 56, 684–714.
Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (Eds.). (2008a). Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare – Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung. Münster: Waxmann.
Blömeke, S., Müller, C., Felbrich, A., & Kaiser, G. (2008b). Epistemologische Überzeugungen zur Natur der Mathematik. In S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematik-Studierender und -referendare – Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung (pp. 219–246). Münster: Waxmann.
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 154–171.
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., Kaiser, G., & Döhrmann, M. (2012). Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 44–55.
Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30, 195–200.
Bromme, R. (2005). Thinking and knowing about knowledge: A plea for and critical remarks on psychological research programs on epistemological beliefs. In M. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign – Grounding mathematics education (pp. 191–201). New York: Springer.
Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62, 37–60.
Brouwer, N., & ten Brinke, S. (1995). Der Einfluss integrativer Lehrerausbildung auf die Unterrichtskompetenz (II). Empirische Pädagogik, 9, 289–330.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Even, R., & Ball, D. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics. New York: Springer.
Felbrich, A., Kaiser, G., & Schmotz, C. (2012). The cultural dimension of beliefs: An investigation of future primary teachers’ epistemological beliefs concerning the nature of mathematics in 15 countries. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(2), 355–366.
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19, 3–45.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898.
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences – Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.
Keller-Schneider, M. (2011). Die Bedeutung von Berufswahlmotiven von Lehrpersonen in der Bewältigung beruflicher Anforderungen in der Berufseingangsphase. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 4, 157–185.
Klieme, E., & Vieluf, S. (2009). Teaching practices, teachers’ beliefs and attitudes. In OECD (Ed.), Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS (pp. 87–135). Paris: OECD.
König, J., & Herzmann, P. (2011). Lernvoraussetzungen angehender Lehrkräfte am Anfang ihrer Ausbildung: Erste Ergebnisse aus der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Kölner Modellkollegs Bildungswissenschaften. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 4, 186–210.
König, J., & Rothland, M. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: Effects on general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 289–315.
Leder, C., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (Eds.). (2002). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75–95.
Leung, F. K. S., Graf, K.-D., & Lopez-Real, F. J. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics education in different cultural traditions – A comparative study of the East Asia and the West: The 13th ICMI study. New York: Springer.
Mayr, J. (2009). LehrerIn werden in Österreich: Empirische Befunde zum Lehramtsstudium. Erziehung und Unterricht, 159, 14–33.
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2000). Professional standards for teaching mathematics (ENC-001451). Reston: NCTM.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.
NOKUT = Nasjonalt Organ for Kvalitet i Utdanningen. (2006). Evaluering av allmennlærerutdanningen i Norge 2006: Hovedrapport. Retrieved from http://www.nokut.no/Documents/NOKUT/Artikkelbibliotek/Norsk_utdanning/SK/alueva/ALUEVA_Hovedrapport.pdf.
OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs. A quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13–37). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1968). Patterns of development in thought and values of students in a liberal arts college: A validation of a scheme. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 1–40.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.
Rodd, M. M. (1997). Beliefs and their warrants in mathematics learning. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st international conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (Vol. 4, pp. 64–65). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Lahti Research and Training Center.
Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (1996). A multidimensionality-based DIF analysis paradigm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 355–371.
Schiefele, U., & Urhahne, D. (2000). Motivationale und volitionale Bedingungen der Studienleistung. In U. Schiefele & K.-P. Wild (Eds.), Interesse und Lernmotivation. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung, Förderung und Wirkung (pp. 183–205). Münster: Waxmann.
Schmidt, W. H., Blömeke, S., & Tatto, M. T. (2011). Teacher education matters: A study of the mathematics teacher preparation from six countries. New York: Teacher College Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving focuses in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329–363.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4, 1–94.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39, 19–29.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323–332.
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. East Lansing: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., et al. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam: IEA.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. San Francisco: Westview Press.
UNESCO. (1997). International standard classification of education. http://www.unesco.org/education/information/nfsunesco/doc/isced_1997.htm
Vieluf, S., & Klieme, E. (2011). Cross-nationally comparative results on teachers’ qualification, beliefs, and practices. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction (pp. 295–325). New York: Springer.
Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 167–202.
Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., & Tysvaer, N. M. (2007). Profiles of beginning teachers’ professional engagement and career development aspirations. In A. Berry, A. Clemans, & A. Kostogriz (Eds.), Dimensions of professional learning: Professionalism, practice and identity (pp. 155–176). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: An international comparison using the FIT-choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 791–805.
Wehling, L., & Charters, W. (1969). Dimensions of teacher beliefs about the teaching process. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 7–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G. (2015). Effects of Motivation on the Belief Systems of Future Mathematics Teachers from a Comparative Perspective. In: Pepin, B., Roesken-Winter, B. (eds) From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06807-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06808-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)