Skip to main content

Transformation of the Software Testing Glossary into a Browsable Concept Map

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations and Advances in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, Networking and Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 313))

Abstract

Authors propose a transformation method of the glossary “Standard glossary of terms used in Software Testing” created by ISTQB document into a basic concept map. By applying natural language processing techniques and analyzing the discovered relations between concepts the most essential aspects of the software testing domain are elicited and integrated. As the result a browsable concept map is created. Browsable concept map can be used as a learning support tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Software Testing Qualifications Board, Standard glossary of terms used in Software Testing. Version 2.2, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISTQB, International Software Testing Qualifications Board, Available: http://istqb.org

  3. G. Arnicans, D. Romans, and U. Straujums, “Semi-automatic Generation of a Software Testing Lightweight Ontology from a Glossary Based on the ONTO6 Methodology”, Databases and Information Systems VII, Selected Papers from the Tenth International Baltic Conference, DB&IS 2012, IOS Press, 14 p., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Software Testing Qualifications Board, Standard glossary of terms used in Software Testing. Version 2.1, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joseph D. Novak and Alberto J. Cañas, “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them,” Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, 36 p.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Applied Concept Mapping: Capturing, Analyzing, and Organizing Knowledge/editors, Brian Moon et al., CRC Press, 2011, 340 p.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hajime Saito et al. “A Semi-Automatic Construction Method of Concept Map Based on Dialog Contents”, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference in Education, 2001, 8 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Yang, Howard Leung, Lihua Yue, Ligun Deng, Automatically Constructing a Compact Concept Map of Dance Motion with Motion Captured Data, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 6483, 2010, pp. 329-338.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Graudina and J. Grundspenkis, “Concept map generation from OWL ontologies”, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia and Helsinki, Finland, 2008, pp. 263-270.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Zubrinic, D. Kalpic, and M. Milicevic, M. “The automatic creation of concept maps from documents written using morphologically rich languages,” in Expert Systems with Applications, 39(16), 2012, pp. 12709–12718. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.065

  11. Loris Bozzato, Mauro Ferrari, Alberto Trombetta, Building a domain ontology from glossaries: A general methodology, Integration The Vlsi Journal, 426(2008), pp. 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  12. José R. Hilera, Carmen Pages, J. Javier Martinez, J. Antonio Gutierrez, Luis De-Marcos, An Evolutive Process to Convert Glossaries into Ontologies, Information technology and libraries, vol. 29, no4(2010), pp. 195–204

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ivan Bedini, Benjamin Nguyen, Automatic ontology generation: State of the art, in: PRiSM Laboratory Technical Report. University of Versailles, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adrian Müller, Jochen Dörre, Peter Gerstl, Roland Seiffert, The TaxGen Framework: Automating the Generation of a Taxonomy for a Large Document Collection, in: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 2(1999), 9p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guntis Arnicans, Uldis Straujums. Complementary material to the paper: Transformation of the Software Testing Glossary into a Browsable Concept Map [online]. Available: http://science.df.lu.lv/as12/

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work is partly supported by the European Social Fund Project No. 2009/0216/1DP/1.1.1.2.0/09/APIA/VIAA/044. This work has been partially supported by the Latvian National Research Program Nr. 2 “Development of Innovative Multifunctional Materials, Signal Processing and Information Technologies for Competitive Science Intensive Products” within the project Nr. 5 “New Information Technologies Based on Ontologies and Model Transformations”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guntis Arnicans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arnicans, G., Straujums, U. (2015). Transformation of the Software Testing Glossary into a Browsable Concept Map. In: Sobh, T., Elleithy, K. (eds) Innovations and Advances in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, Networking and Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06773-5_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06773-5_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06772-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06773-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics