Abstract
Traditionally, theoreticians represent the process of decision-making as a block diagram of choosing a certain decision from several alternatives to achieve formulated goals using accumulated experience and available resources. It is necessary to define assessment criteria for evaluating the alternatives with respect to the goals and a current situation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We underline an important aspect—increasing the number of experts may impair expertise. Actually, everything depends on some properties of expertise (in particular, its complexity, multi-aspect character, and subject). Assessment of “simple” objects can employ very many experts of almost any qualification levels (see examples in [105]). Yet, in “complicated” situations, one should invite several professionals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gubanov, D., Korgin, N., Novikov, D., Raikov, A. (2014). E-Expertise. In: E-Expertise: Modern Collective Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 558. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06770-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06770-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06769-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06770-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)