Skip to main content

Call for Action: Designing for Harmony in Creative Teams

  • Conference paper
Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice (DESRIST 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8463))

Abstract

Competitive markets force diverse organizations to intensively manage innovation. Many of them set up multifunctional teams responsible for generating novel and original ideas. Such teams often face higher risk of conflicts and tensions, being an inherent part of creative processes. Impact of this phenomena on creative performance of teams, even though extensively addressed in research, remains unclarified. We approach this issue while providing a novel interpretation framework inspired by the concept of harmony in jazz improvisation. We apply it to observations made with project teams in an organizational setting, and use it to inform design of a supporting collaborative solution. We postulate the need for further work on team harmony and creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, S., Bell, G.G.: Timing and Music. Acad. Manage. Rev. 27(4), 574–593 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amabile, T.M.: A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10, 123–167 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, N., et al.: The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. J. Organ. Behav. 25(2), 147–173 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett, F.J., Peplowski, K.: Minimal Structures Within a Song: An Analysis of “All of Me”. Organ. Sci. 9(5), 558–560 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benford, S., et al.: Collaborative Virtual Environments. Commun. ACM 44(7), 79–85 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Börjesson, S., Fredberg, T.: Jam sessions for collaborative management research. Collab. Res. Organ. Sage Lond. 135–148 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vom Brocke, J., et al.: Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 2206–2217. AIS, Verona (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, T.: Design Thinking. Harv. Bus. Rev. 86(6), 84–92 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brush, A.J.B., et al.: Notification for Shared Annotation of Digital Documents. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 89–96. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cain, S.: Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. Random House Digital, Inc. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carleton, T., Leifer, L.: Stanford’s ME310 Course as an Evolution of Engineering Design. Presented at the 19th CIRP Design Conference, Cranfield, UK (March 31, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, M.-H.: Understanding the Benefits and Detriments of Conflict on Team Creativity Process. Creat. Innov. Manag. 15(1), 105–116 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crossan, M.M.: Improvisation in action. Organ. Sci. 9(5), 593–599 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Dreu, C.K.W., et al.: Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 5(1), 81–89 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Dreu, C.K.W.: When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams. J. Manag. 32(1), 83–107 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Dreu, C.K.W., Weingart, L.R.: Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(4), 741–749 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dym, C.L., et al.: Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. J. Eng. Educ. 94(1), 103–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fairchild, J., Hunter, S.T.: We’ve Got Creative Differences: The Effects of Task Conflict and Participative Safety on Team Creative Performance. J. Creat. Behav. 64–87 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farh, J.-L., et al.: Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When. J. Appl. Psychol. 95(6), 1173–1180 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. George, J.M.: Creativity in Organizations. Acad. Manag. Ann. 1(1), 439–477 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldkuhl, G.: Design theories in information systems-a need for multi-grounding. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. JITTA 6(2), 59–72 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harvey, C., et al.: Academic Journal Quality Guide: Version 4. The Association of Business Schools (ABS), London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harvey, L.J., Myers, M.D.: Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap. Inf. Technol. People 8(3), 13–27 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hatch, M.J.: Exploring the Empty Spaces of Organizing: How Improvisational Jazz Helps Redescribe Organizational Structure. Organ. Stud. Walter Gruyter GmbH Co KG 20(1), 75–100 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hennessey, B.A., Amabile, T.M.: Creativity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 61, 569–598 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Holbrook, M.B.: Playing the Changes on the Jazz Metaphor: An Expanded Conceptualization of Music-, Management-, and Marketing-Related Themes. Found. Trends® Mark 2(3-4), 185–442 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Horn, C., Brem, A.: Strategic directions on innovation management – a conceptual framework. Manag. Res. Rev. 36(10), 939–954 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hsieh, T.-J., et al.: The Impact of Top Management Team Conflict on New Product Development: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 7(2), 193–208 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hülsheger, U.R., et al.: Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J. Appl. Psychol. 94(5), 1128–1145 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jehn, K.A.: A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups. Adm. Sci. Q. 42(3), 530–557 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jehn, K.A., et al.: The Effects of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcomes. Acad. Manage. J. 53(3), 596–616 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jehn, K.A., Mannix, E.A.: The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. Acad. Manage. J. 44(2), 238–251 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson, H., Carruthers, L.: Supporting creative and reflective processes. Int. J. Hum. -Comput. Stud. 64(10), 998–1030 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamoche, K., Cunha, M.P.e.: Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation. Organ. Stud. 22(5), 733–764 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kerr, N.L., Tindale, R.S.: Group Performance and Decision Making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55(1), 623–655 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Ilgen, D.R.: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 7(3), 77–124 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kratzer, J., et al.: Team Polarity and Creative Performance in Innovation Teams. Creat. Innov. Manag. 15(1), 96–104 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kunifuji, S., Kato, N.: Consensus-Making Support Systems Dedicated to Creative Problem Solving. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 6(3), 459–474 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kurtzberg, T.R., Amabile, T.M.: From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity. Creat. Res. J. 13(3/4), 285–294 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kurtzberg, T.R., Mueller, J.S.: The Influence of Daily Conflict on Perceptions of Creativity: A Longitudinal Study. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 16(4), 335–353 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lovelace, K., et al.: Maximizing Cross-Functional New Product Teams’ Innovativeness and Constraint Adherence: A Conflict Communications Perspective. Acad. Manage. J. 44(4), 779–793 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lubart, T.: How can computers be partners in the creative process: Classification and commentary on the Special Issue. Int. J. Hum.- Comput. Stud. 63(4/5), 365–369 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mantere, S., et al.: Music as a metaphor for organizational change. J. Organ. Change Manag. 20(3), 447–459 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McCrimmon, M.: Teams without roles: empowering teams for greater creativity. J. Manag. Dev. 14(6), 35–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Meyer, A., et al.: The Organization Science Jazz Festival: Improvisation as a Metaphor for Organizing. Organ. Sci. 9(5), 540–542 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Müller, S.D., Ulrich, F.: Creativity and Information Systems in a Hypercompetitive Environment: A Literature Review. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 32, 175–200 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Myers, M.: Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research. Commun AIS. 2, 4es (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nemeth, C.J., Ormiston, M.: Creative idea generation: harmony versus stimulation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 37(3), 524–535 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nunamaker, J.F., et al.: Electronic Meeting Systems. Commun. ACM 34(7), 40–61 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. O’Neill, T.A., et al.: Examining the “pros” and “cons” of team conflict: A team-level meta-analysis of task, relationship, and process conflict. Hum. Perform. 26(3), 236–260 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. O’Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L.: The ambidextrous organization. Harv. Bus. Rev. 82(4), 74–83 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Okoli, C., Schabram, K.: A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Sprouts Work. Pap. Inf. Syst. 10, 26 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pankoke-Babatz, U., et al.: Stories about asynchronous awareness. In: Cooperative System Design: Scenario-Based Design of Collaborative Systems, pp. 23–38. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Paulus, P.: Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups. Appl. Psychol. 49(2), 237–262 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Paulus, P.B., et al.: Modeling ideational creativity in groups: Connecting cognitive, neural, and computational approaches. Small Group Res. 41(6), 688–724 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Paulus, P.B., Coskun, H.: Creativity. In: Levine, J.M. (ed.) Group Processes, pp. 215–239. Psychology Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Paulus, P.B.: Huei-Chuan Yang: Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 82(1), 76–87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Plattner, H., et al.: An unified innovation process model for engineering designers and managers. In: Design Thinking Understand, Improve, Apply. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Randel, D.M.: The Harvard Dictionary of Music. Harvard University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rodden, T., Blair, G.: CSCW and Distributed Systems: The Problem of Control. In: Bannon, L., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 49–64. Springer Netherlands (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Saunders, C.: MIS Journal Rankings, http://ais.site-ym.com/?page=JournalRankings

  63. Scheer, A.-W.: Jazz-Improvisation und Management (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shneiderman, B.: Creativity Support Tools. Commun. ACM 45(10), 116–120 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sonalkar, N., et al.: Emotion in Engineering Design Teams. In: Fukuda, S. (ed.) Emotional Engineering, pp. 311–326. Springer, London (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  66. Steve, H. (ed.): Media Space 20+ Years of Mediated Life. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Thompson, L.: Improving the creativity of organizational work groups. Acad. Manag. Exec. 17(1), 96–109 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tidd, J., Bessant, J.: Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. John Wiley & Sons (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tjosvold, D.: Cooperative and Competitive Goal Approach to Conflict: Accomplishments and Challenges. Appl. Psychol. 47(3), 285–313 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Tschirky, H.: Managing innovation driven companies: approaches in practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Voigt, M., Niehaves, B., Becker, J.: Towards a Unified Design Theory for Creativity Support Systems. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B., et al. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 152–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  72. Walzer, N., Salcher, A.: Management by jazz – creating innovation from the principles of chaos and order. Ind. Commer. Train. 35(2), 67–69 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Q., xiii–xxiii (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  74. West, M.A., Farr, J.L.: Innovation at work. In: West, M.A., Farr, J.L. (eds.) Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies, pp. 3–13. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  75. De Wit, F.R.C., et al.: The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 97(2), 360–390 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zentner, M.R., Kagan, J.: Infants’ perception of consonance and dissonance in music. Infant Behav. Dev. 21(3), 483–492 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dolata, M., Schwabe, G. (2014). Call for Action: Designing for Harmony in Creative Teams. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds) Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice. DESRIST 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06700-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06701-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics