Skip to main content

Assessing Cooperation in Open Systems: An Empirical Test in Healthcare

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analysis and Modeling of Complex Data in Behavioral and Social Sciences
  • 2255 Accesses

Abstract

This paper aims to detect the social mechanisms underlying cooperation in organizational communities. To this purpose, it proposes to apply a longitudinal Social Network Analysis approach based on Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for network dynamics to Web 2.0 data on interpersonal interaction. The paper claims and demonstrates that such an approach allows alleviating some limitations of current studies. It overcomes the issue of relational missing data. Also, it models directly the network structure as the outcome of actors’ counterparts selection in their neighbourhood. Application is on a virtual community of Italian oncologists who collaborate in resolving diagnoses. Using repository and field data, we reconstruct a network, with clinicians as nodes and emails exchanged as ties. Then, we model cooperation longitudinally. Evidence is provided that emergent behaviors are effectively captured and advantages of this approach are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The rarety of the cancer forms examined implies also a low frequency of information exchange. Network emergence is therefore assumed to be a slow process.

  2. 2.

    Extensions to ordinal data have been proposed, but are still to be documented in the literature.

  3. 3.

    Four degree ordinal scaling, with 1  = not competent at all in the field, , 4  = very competent. The scale was dichotomised so that 1 and 2 were recoded as not competent and 3 and 4 as competent.

  4. 4.

    We scanned the hospital websites and the 2009 Italian White Book on Cancer Treatments. For each hospital, it reports a list of clinicians expert in any form of cancer.

References

  • Ahuja, M., & Carley, K. (1999). Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 741–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A. L., & Reka, A. (1999). Emergence of scaling of random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, K. O., & Shenton, L. R. (1985). Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: an analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In K. Carley & M. Prietula (Eds.), Computational organization theory (pp. 89–112). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P. R., & Contractor, S. N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. R. (1997). Markov chains. Cambridge series in statistical and probabilistic mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opsahl, T., & Hogan, B. (2011). Growth mechanisms in continuously-observed networks: Communication in a Facebook-like community [arXiv:1010.2141].

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintane, E., & Kleinbaum, A. M. (2011). Matter over mind? E-mail Data and the Treasurent of Social Networks. Connect, 31(1), 22–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951). A stochastic approximation method. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(3), 400–407.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69–89.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van Duijn, M. A. J., Gile, K. J., & Handcock, M. S. (2009). A framework for the comparison of maximum pseudo-likelihood and maximum likelihood estimation of exponential family random graph models. Social Networks, 31(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Zappa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zappa, P. (2014). Assessing Cooperation in Open Systems: An Empirical Test in Healthcare. In: Vicari, D., Okada, A., Ragozini, G., Weihs, C. (eds) Analysis and Modeling of Complex Data in Behavioral and Social Sciences. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06692-9_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics