Skip to main content

Primal Implication as Encryption

  • Conference paper
  • 3685 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8476))

Abstract

We propose a “cryptographic” interpretation for the propositional connectives of primal infon logic introduced by Y. Gurevich and I. Neeman and prove the corresponding soundness and completeness results. Primal implication φ →  p ψ corresponds to the encryption of ψ with a secret key φ, primal disjunction φ ∨  p ψ is a group key and \(\bot\) reflects some backdoor constructions such as full superuser permissions or a universal decryption key. For the logic of \(\bot\) as a universal key (it was never considered before) we prove that the derivability problem has linear time complexity. We also show that the universal key can be emulated using primal disjunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gurevich, Y., Neeman, I.: DKAL: Distributed-Knowledge Authorization Language. In: Proc. of CSF 2008, pp. 149–162. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gurevich, Y., Neeman, I.: DKAL 2 — A Simplified and Improved Authorization Language. Technical Report MSR-TR-2009-11, Microsoft Research (February 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gurevich, Y., Neeman, I.: Logic of infons: the propositional case. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 12(2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beklemishev, L., Gurevich, Y.: Propositional primal logic with disjunction. J. of Logic and Computation 22, 26 pages (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cotrini, C., Gurevich, Y.: Basic primal infon logic. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2012-88, Microsoft Research (August 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Troelstra, A., Schwichtenberg, H.: Basic proof theory. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 43. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldreich, O.: Foundations of Cryptography: Volume 1, Basic Tools. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Blum, M.: Coin Flipping by Telephone. In: Proceedings of CRYPTO, pp. 11–15 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krupski, V.N. (2014). Primal Implication as Encryption. In: Hirsch, E.A., Kuznetsov, S.O., Pin, JÉ., Vereshchagin, N.K. (eds) Computer Science - Theory and Applications. CSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8476. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06686-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06686-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06685-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06686-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics