Skip to main content

NATO Enlargement: Coping with Act II (1999)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Jonathan Dean

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice ((BRIEFSPIONEER,volume 19))

  • 235 Accesses

Abstract

The Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation, the document of understanding signed by NATO and Russia in Paris in May 1997, is a good idea on its own merits. Even though conflicting U.S. and Russian interpretations of its content undermine the act’s value, it is nonetheless worthwhile to establish a systematic means of communication between NATO and Russia and to attach Russian military officers to many NATO staffs. But NATO enlargement—whose negative impact the Founding Act was intended to cushion—remains a bad idea.

Jonathan Dean—deceased

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This text was first published as “NATO Enlargement: Coping with Act II”, in: Ted Galen Carpenter, Barbara Conry (Eds.): NATO Enlargement—Illusions and Reality (Washington, DC: CATO Institute, 1998): 121–127. The permission to republish this text was granted on behalf of the CATO Institute by Ms. Eleanor R. O’Connor on 18 March 2014.

  2. 2.

    Madeleine K. Albright, “Statement at North Atlantic Council Ministerial Meeting, Sintra, Portugal, May 29, 1997,” Office of the Spokesman, U.S. Department of State.

  3. 3.

    Statement of the Secretary General, NATO Press Office, July 8, 1997.

  4. 4.

    Trent Lott, “The Senate's Role in NATO Enlargement”, Washington Post, March 21, 1997.

  5. 5.

    Lionel Barber, “No Turning Back from Brave New Europe,” Financial Times, July 17, 1997.

  6. 6.

    George Cunningham, “EU and NATO Enlargement; How Public Opinion Is Shaping Up in Some Candidate Countries,” NATO Review, May–June, 1997.

  7. 7.

    Vaclav Havel, “NATO’s Quality of Life”, New York Tunes, May 13, 1997; and Jim Hoagland, “At Center Stage for Havel: NATO,” Washington Post, May 9, 1996.

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dean, J. (2014). NATO Enlargement: Coping with Act II (1999). In: Brauch, H., Grimwood, T. (eds) Jonathan Dean. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06662-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics