Skip to main content

Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy

Part of the book series: Cooperative Management ((COMA))

Abstract

Different regulations about the permission and approval rate of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) between the USA and Europe have been controversial for decades. While there is a wide scientific coverage of what may be the cause of this divergence, little is known about the role that popular media play in the related political discourse. We analyzed the media coverage of biotechnology topics in both the USA and UK from 2011-2013 by examining two opinion-leading newspapers. We test the hypothesis that the respective media content reflects differences in transatlantic policies towards biotechnology. The two newspapers differed in reporting intensity but were alike in their content about GMOs: with the central actors being scientists and NGOs, arguing mostly in the field of the agricultural sector, the debate seems to be locked in a stalemate of potential risks re-iterated against potential benefits, with none of the two positions clearly dominating the discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (1998). Biotechnology in the public sphere: A European sourcebook. London: NMSI Trading Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research. Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2002). Biotechnology-the making of a global controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlarne, C. (2007). Notes from a climate change pressure-cooker: sub-federal attempts at transformation meet national resistance in the USA. Connecticut Law Review, 40, 1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Directorate-General for Economic. (2007). The joint harmonised EU programme of business and consumer surveys (No. 5-2006). European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T., & Friedman, D. E. (1996). The role of employers in addressing the needs of employed parents. Journal of Social Issues, 52(3), 111–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, G., & Bauer, M. W. (Eds.). (2001). Biotechnology, 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy. London: NMSI Trading Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Allum, N. C. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US. Science, 285(5426), 384–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutteling, J. M., Fjæstad, B., & Olofsson, A. (2002). Media coverage 1973–1996: trends and dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepplinger, H. M., Ehmig, S. C., & Ahlheim, C. (1991). Gentechnik im Widerstreit: Zum Verhaltnis von Wissenschaft und Journalismus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. R. (1989). Parallel content analysis: Old paradigms and new proposals. Public communication and behavior, 2, 205–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politi, M. C., Kaphingst, K. A., Kreuter, M., Shacham, E., Lovell, M. C., & McBride, T. (2014). Knowledge of health insurance terminology and details among the uninsured. Medical Care Research and Review, 71(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, I., & Association, Canadian Medical. (2002). Annual national report card on health care 2002. Ottawa, Ont: Canadian Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, I. M. (2002). Regulation of biotechnology: Will we ever ‘freely’ trade GMOs? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(1), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sliter, M., Boyd, E., Sinclair, R., Cheung, J., & McFadden, A. (2013). Inching Toward Inclusiveness: Diversity Climate, Interpersonal Conflict and Well-Being in Women Nurses. Sex Roles, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsioumani, E. (2004). Genetically modified organisms in the EU: Public attitudes and regulatory developments. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 13(3), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valtysson, B. (2014). Democracy in disguise: the use of social media in reviewing the Icelandic Constitution. Media, Culture and Society, 36(1), 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO, F. (2000). Ad-hoc intergovernmental Codex task force on animal feeding. 13 p. First Session. Dinamarca, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2p2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

It is a great pleasure to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. George Baourakis and the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh) that presented me with a most memorable learning experience and an inside look into the world of science and research. First and foremost, I could not but thank Dr. Kostas Karantininis for his invaluable guidance, advice, support, and encouragement, both in times of excitement and disappointment. My deepest appreciation goes also to Drs. Gaskell and Bauer for all their academic work that has always been an enormous inspiration for me.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Galata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Galata, L., Karantininis, K., Hess, S. (2014). Cross-Atlantic Differences in Biotechnology and GMOs: A Media Content Analysis. In: Zopounidis, C., Kalogeras, N., Mattas, K., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G. (eds) Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics