Skip to main content

Development and Application of Economic and Environmental Models of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture: Some Difficult Choices for Policy Makers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy

Part of the book series: Cooperative Management ((COMA))

  • 947 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes how economic models designed to examine agricultural policy can be adapted to explore environmental applications such as the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture to a 2050 time horizon. The tensions between environmental policy aimed at reducing GHG emissions, and policies promoting agricultural production to increase food security are explored. Ireland is a major net exporter of beef and milk products, with agriculture representing a high share of non-Emissions Trading Scheme (non-ETS) GHG emissions. Ireland is used to illustrate an issue which has wide-scale global implications. The feasibility of achieving emission reductions is examined in the absence of technical abatement measures. Instead, to reduce emissions the size of the suckler herd is limited. However, it is found that even eliminating the suckler herd would leave emissions well short of achieving a 20 % reduction target. Even a 10 % GHG emissions reduction, while possible under this approach, is likely to be politically unfeasible. The tension between environmental and food security is likely to be replicated at a global level, given the significant contribution of agricultural production to anthropogenic climate change. The chapter highlights the importance of detailed modelling of future emissions in advance of setting feasible emissions reduction targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2003). The Luxembourg CAP reform agreement: Implications for EU and Irish agriculture. The Luxembourg CAP Agreement, October 2003. Ireland: Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2007). CAP health check analysis: Impact on EU milk quota expansion, Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binfield, J., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Westhoff, P. (2008). Issues in examining the impact of WTO reform on the beef and dairy sectors in the European Union. Contributed paper, International Association of Agricultural Economists 2009 Conference, August 16–22, 2009, Beijing, China. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/51752/2/51752.pdf.

  • Breen, J. P. (2008). Controlling greenhouse gas emissions by means of tradable emissions permits and the implications for Irish farmers. Contributed paper European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE), 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, J., Donnellan, T., & Westhoff, P. (2010). Food for thought: EU agriculture presents new challenges for EU agriculture. EuroChoices, 9(3), 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Office CSO (2013). Quarterly National Household Survey. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.cso.ie/en/qnhs/.

  • Clark, H. (2008). New Zealand’s agricultural GHG emissions: policies and approaches. Teagasc GHG Seminar. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from www.teagasc.ie/publications/2008/20080328/index.asp.

  • DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). (2010). Food harvest 2020. Dublin, Ireland. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/agri-foodindustry/foodharvest2020/.

  • DECLG (Department of Environment, Community and Local Government). (2013). Draft heads of climate action and low carbon development bill 2013. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/ClimateChange/FileDownLoad,32468,en.pdf.

  • Donnellan, T., & Hanrahan, K. (2006). It’s the environment, stupid! To what extent can WTO trade reform lead to environmental rather than economic impacts? 3rd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Kyoto, Japan. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.webmeets.com/files/papers/ERE/WC3/352/donnellanhanrahan.pdf.

  • European Environment Agency. (2013). EEA data viewer. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/.

  • Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Ireland National Inventory Report 2012. Wexford, Ireland. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://coe.epa.ie/ghg/nirdownloads.jsp.

  • European Parliament. (2009). Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2009a). How to feed the world in 2050. Retrieved March 11, 2013, from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf.

  • FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2009b). The state of food insecurity in the world: Economic crises—impacts and lessons learned. Retrieved March 11, 2013, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3027e/i3027e.pdf.

  • FAOStat. (2013). Statistical Database of the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://faostat.fao.org/.

  • FAPRI-ISU. (2012). 2012 World Agricultural Outlook. Iowa State University, Ames IA. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/outlook/2012/.

  • GO-Science. (2011). Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming. The Government Office for Science, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, K. (2001). The EU GOLD Model 2.1: An introductory manual. Mimeo, Teagasc, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K., Giblin, T., & McHugh, D. (1988). Economic development in Ireland in the 20th century. Dublin: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leip, A., Weiss, F., Wassenaar, T., Perez, I., Fellmann, T., Loudjani, P., Tubiello, F., Grandgirard, D., Monni, S., & Biala, K. (2010). Evaluation of the livestock sector’s contribution to the EU greenhouse gas emissions (GGELS)—final report. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/livestock-gas/index_en.htm.

  • NESC. (2012a). Towards a new national climate policy: Interim report of the NESC secretariat. Report to the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government. June 2012. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/ClimateChange/FileDownLoad,31202,en.pdf.

  • NESC. (2012b). Ireland and the climate change challenge: Connecting ‘How Much’ with ‘How To’. Final Report of the NESC Secretariat to the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government. December 2012. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/ClimateChange/FileDownLoad,32467,en.pdf.

  • McCarthy, C., & Scott, S. (2008). Controlling the cost of controlling the climate: The Irish government’s climate change strategy. ESRI Working Paper No. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, W., Westhoff, P., Fabiosa, J., & Hayes, D. J. (2010). The FAPRI global modelling system and outlook. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD-FAO. (2012). Agricultural outlook 2012–2021. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara, F., Ryan, M., Connolly, J., O’Toole, P., Carton, O., Lenehan, J. J., et al. (2006). Climate change—estimation of emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture and strategies for their reduction. Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, S. J., Campbell, B. M., & Ingram, J. S. I. (2012). Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 37, 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff, P., & Meyers, W. (2010). The FAPRI approach: A few key principles. Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 6(1), 133–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevor Donnellan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., Breen, J.P. (2014). Development and Application of Economic and Environmental Models of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture: Some Difficult Choices for Policy Makers. In: Zopounidis, C., Kalogeras, N., Mattas, K., van Dijk, G., Baourakis, G. (eds) Agricultural Cooperative Management and Policy. Cooperative Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06635-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics