Skip to main content

Developing Science Teachers’ Representational Competence and Its Impact on Their Teaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Teachers’ Use of Visual Representations

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 8))

Abstract

This book has consisted of a series of chapters that describe and discuss the knowledge that has been accumulated regarding teachers’ meta-representational competence (MRC) and the pedagogies within which it is displayed. Relatively little literature on this theme has so far been published. This book ha identified the gaps in knowledge that must be filled, for example: the nature of the curriculum through which MRC can be taught; how MRC enables a teacher to respond to students’ difficulties in understanding and producing representations. In this, the last chapter, key themes in the use of representations in teaching and learning are revisited and integrated into a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • diSessa, A., & Sherin, B. (2000). Meta-representation: An introduction. Mathematical Behaviour, 19, 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, K. (2008). Visualisation: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualisation: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2010). Supporting the development of effective science teachers. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching (pp. 274–300). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (Eds.). (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P., et al. (1991). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In R. K. Barr (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 641–668). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUPAC. (2013). IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology: The gold book. Washington, DC: IUPAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to a changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 33–47). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, J. E. (1999). The concise Oxford dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, C. (1931). Logic as semiotics: The theory of signs. In B. Justus (Ed.), Philosophical writings of piece (1893–1910) (pp. 98–119). New York: Dover, Reprint 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D., & Tsui, C. Y. (Eds.). (2013). Multiple representations in biological education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D., Harrison, A., et al. (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogies: An approach for pre-service and inservice teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 92(2), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Akker, J. (1998). The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes. In B. F. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 421–448). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John K. Gilbert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gilbert, J.K., Eilam, B. (2014). Developing Science Teachers’ Representational Competence and Its Impact on Their Teaching. In: Eilam, B., Gilbert, J. (eds) Science Teachers’ Use of Visual Representations. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics