Abstract
This chapter presents a novel way of approaching science education through activities involving Student-Generated visual Representations (SGR), and examines the role of the teacher in leading such instructional approach. We conducted a 4-week study in a sixth grade classroom (31 students) focusing on the topic of energy transformation. We designed an instructional unit involving activities of SGR that include: the generation of visual representations by students that describe energy transformations in various phenomena, small group negotiations and co-constructions of representations, class discussions on scientific principles centered around a selection of students’ representations, and class discussions aiming to develop a set of criteria for evaluating representations. We demonstrate how aspects of such instructional design give rise to progressive activity structures, authentic forms of dialogue, and original ways for students to be explicit about their own ideas, and express themselves and their creativity. Nevertheless, meeting these opportunities requires a significant transformation of the teacher’s role in the classroom, which may profoundly challenge her epistemological beliefs. We argue that this instructional approach, with the appropriate guidance, can serve as a springboard for such deep transformation of teacher epistemological beliefs, which in turn support the emergence of new instructional practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, R. J. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching. London: Dialogos.
Bamberger, J. (2007). Restructuring conceptual intuitions through invented notations: From path-making to map-making. In Teubal (Ed.), The development of notational representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (2007). Negotiated representational mediators: How young children decide what to include in their science representations. Science Education, 91(1), 1–35.
diSessa, A. A. (2004). Meta-representation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331.
diSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117–160.
Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4).
Freire, P., & Shor, I. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey.
Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). New York: Springer.
Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hall, R. P. (1990). Making mathematics on paper: Constructing representations of stories about related linear functions. Unpublished dissertation, University of California at Irvine.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Healey, P. G. T. (2006). Drawing things together: Integrating modalities and co-ordinating understanding. In Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies ICALT’06 (pp. 1200–1201). Kerkrade.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.
Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society, 6, 1–40.
Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 77–97.
Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nave, E. (2009). Dialogic teaching and learning: Targets and obstructive factors in dialogic leaning. The ministry of education web-site. The center for research and information (in Hebrew) http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/TelAviv/MarkazMachkarVmayda/lemidadialog.htm
Ochs, E., Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1994). Interpretative journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations, 2(1), 151–172.
Olafson, L., & Schraw, G. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices within and across domains. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 71–84.
Peled, N., & Bloom-Kolke, S. (1997). Dialogism in classroom discourse. Linguistic Plot, 24, 6–28 (in Hebrew).
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–31.
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Cheshire: Graphics Press.
Yechiely, T., & Nussbaum, Y. (1998). Misconceptions and conceptual change in science education (2nd ed.). Tel-Aviv: Mofet (in Hebrew).
Yoed, Z., & Levin, T. (2007). Epistemological perceptions of children: What do elementary school’s children think about knowledge and knowing? Theory and Practice in Curriculum Studies, 19, 49–129 (in Hebrew).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parnafes, O., Trachtenberg-Maslaton, R. (2014). Transformed Instruction: Teaching in a Student-Generated Representations Learning Environment. In: Eilam, B., Gilbert, J. (eds) Science Teachers’ Use of Visual Representations. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06525-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06526-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)