Skip to main content

Transformed Instruction: Teaching in a Student-Generated Representations Learning Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Teachers’ Use of Visual Representations

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 8))

  • 1602 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a novel way of approaching science education through activities involving Student-Generated visual Representations (SGR), and examines the role of the teacher in leading such instructional approach. We conducted a 4-week study in a sixth grade classroom (31 students) focusing on the topic of energy transformation. We designed an instructional unit involving activities of SGR that include: the generation of visual representations by students that describe energy transformations in various phenomena, small group negotiations and co-constructions of representations, class discussions on scientific principles centered around a selection of students’ representations, and class discussions aiming to develop a set of criteria for evaluating representations. We demonstrate how aspects of such instructional design give rise to progressive activity structures, authentic forms of dialogue, and original ways for students to be explicit about their own ideas, and express themselves and their creativity. Nevertheless, meeting these opportunities requires a significant transformation of the teacher’s role in the classroom, which may profoundly challenge her epistemological beliefs. We argue that this instructional approach, with the appropriate guidance, can serve as a springboard for such deep transformation of teacher epistemological beliefs, which in turn support the emergence of new instructional practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, R. J. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching. London: Dialogos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, J. (2007). Restructuring conceptual intuitions through invented notations: From path-making to map-making. In Teubal (Ed.), The development of notational representations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (2007). Negotiated representational mediators: How young children decide what to include in their science representations. Science Education, 91(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (2004). Meta-representation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Shor, I. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 3–24). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. P. (1990). Making mathematics on paper: Constructing representations of stories about related linear functions. Unpublished dissertation, University of California at Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. G. T. (2006). Drawing things together: Integrating modalities and co-ordinating understanding. In Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies ICALT’06 (pp. 1200–1201). Kerkrade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society, 6, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., & Woolgar, S. (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nave, E. (2009). Dialogic teaching and learning: Targets and obstructive factors in dialogic leaning. The ministry of education web-site. The center for research and information (in Hebrew) http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/TelAviv/MarkazMachkarVmayda/lemidadialog.htm

  • Ochs, E., Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1994). Interpretative journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations, 2(1), 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olafson, L., & Schraw, G. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices within and across domains. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, N., & Bloom-Kolke, S. (1997). Dialogism in classroom discourse. Linguistic Plot, 24, 6–28 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Cheshire: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yechiely, T., & Nussbaum, Y. (1998). Misconceptions and conceptual change in science education (2nd ed.). Tel-Aviv: Mofet (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoed, Z., & Levin, T. (2007). Epistemological perceptions of children: What do elementary school’s children think about knowledge and knowing? Theory and Practice in Curriculum Studies, 19, 49–129 (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orit Parnafes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parnafes, O., Trachtenberg-Maslaton, R. (2014). Transformed Instruction: Teaching in a Student-Generated Representations Learning Environment. In: Eilam, B., Gilbert, J. (eds) Science Teachers’ Use of Visual Representations. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06526-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics