Skip to main content

Eco-Management and Audit Scheme: Effects on the Profitability of Their Adherence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Action-Based Quality Management

Abstract

The environmental behavior of companies is one the principal measures that the European Union has promoted in recent years. In this sense, Community Regulation for Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) is the main tool to promote and improve environmental behavior, being a voluntary adherence. The objective of this chapter is to identify the main motivations, barriers of certified companies. Additionally, the influence of these factors on the profitability of their accession will be analyzed by using a structural equation model. To achieve the objectives proposed, we use a sample of 114 of the 255 companies certified EMAS Autonomous Community of Galicia in 2012. The results obtained allow us to identify important implications for managers, which will help them establish management strategies in the future and carry out an environmental planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Álvarez Gil MJ, Burgos Jiménez J, Céspedes Lorente JJ (2001) An analysis of environmental management organizational context and performance of Spanish hotels. Omega 29:457–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103:411–423, Copyright 1988 by the American Psychological Association

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews RNL, Darnall N, Gallagher DR, Keiner ST, Feldman E, Mitchell ML, Amaral D, Jacoby J (2001) Environmental management systems: history, theory and implementation research. In: Coglianese C, Nash J (eds) Regulating from the inside: can environmental management systems achieve policy goals? Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC, pp 31–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci 16(1):74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Bogner W (2002) Deciding on ISO 14001: economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Plann 35(3):269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J 43(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry MA, Rondinelli DA (1998) Proactive corporate environmental management: a new industrial revolution. Acad Manage Exec 12(2):38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan ES, Wong SC (2006) Motivations for ISO 14001 in the hotel industry. Tour Manage 27(3):481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann P (2000) Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad Manage J 43(4):663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claver-Cortés E, Molina-Azorín JF, Tarí JJ, López-Gamero MD (2005) Environmental management, quality management and firm performance: a review of empirical studies. In: Sharma S, Aragón-Correa JA (eds) Corporate environmental strategy and competitive advantage. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 157–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnall N, Gallagher DR, Andrews R, Amaral D (2000) Environmental management systems: opportunities for improved environmental and business strategy. Environ Qual Manage 9(3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall N, Gallagher DR, Andrews RNL (2001) ISO 14001: greening management systems. In: Sarkis J (ed) Greener manufacturing and operations. Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp 179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • EMAS III (2009) Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009. Voluntary participation by organisations in a community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer 58.0 (2002) The attitudes of Europeans towards the environment, The European Opinion Research Group, Directorate-General Environment, European Commision

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Regulation (EC) N. 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing regulation (EC) N. 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:342:0001:0045:EN:PD.F

  • European Commission (2010a) What are the differences between ISO 14001 and EMAS. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/tools/faqen.htm#Toc259178108

  • European Commission (2010b) What are environmental core indicators. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/tools/faqen.htm#Toc259178093

  • European Commission (2014) Reports and statistics. Disponible en http://ec.europa.eu. [fecha consulta 01/01/2014]

  • Fryxell GE, Lo CWH, Chung SS (2004) Influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification on perceptions of EMS effectiveness in China. Environ Manage 33(2):239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavronski I, Ferrer G, Paiva EL (2008) ISO 14001 certification in Brazil: motivations and benefits. J Clean Prod 16(1):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerald EF, Chung SS, Carlos WH (2004) Does the selection of ISO 14001 registrars matter? Registrar reputation and environmental policy statements in China. J Environ Manage 71:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito J, González-Benito O (2005) An analysis of the relationship between environmental motivations and ISO14001 certification. Brit J Manage 16(2):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington HJ, Knight A (1999) ISO 14000 implementation—upgrading your EMS effectively. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Arana G, Molina-Azorín JF (2011) Do drivers matter for the benefits of ISO 14001? Int J Oper Manag 31(2):192–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillary R (2000) EMS: environmental protection the voluntary way. Health Safety Pract 18(4):52–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Iraldo F, Testa F, Frey M (2009) Is an environmental management system able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) in the European Union. J Clean Prod 17(16):1444–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick D, Pouliot C (1996) Environmental management, ISO 14000 offers multiple rewards. Pollut Eng 28(6):62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitazawa S, Sarkis J (2000) The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs. Int J Oper Prod Manage 20(2):225–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman K, Prakash A (2002) EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: examining variations in firmlevel adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in UK, US, and Germany. Policy Sci 35(1):43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link S, Naveh E (2006) Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits? IEEE Trans Eng Manage 53:508–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainieri T, Barnett EG, Valdero TR, Unipan JB, Oskamp S (1997) Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. J Soc Psychol 137(2):189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Azorín JF, Claver-Cortés E, Pereira-Moliner J, Tarí JJ (2009) Environmental practices and firm performance: an empirical analysis in the Spanish hotel industry. J Clean Prod 17(5):516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow D, Rondinelli D (2002) Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. Eur Manage J 20(2):159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E, Perkins R (2005) Uneven geographies of organizational practice: explaining the cross-national transfer and adoption of ISO 9000. Econ Geogr 81(3):237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • OSE (2011) Informe de Sostenibilidad en España. Observatorio para la Sostenibilidad en España. Disponible en http://www.sostenibilidades.org/sites/default/files/Informes/anuales/2011/sostenibilidadenespana2011.pdf

  • Petrosillo I, De Marco A, Botta S, Comoglio C (2012) EMAS in local authorities: suitable indicators in adopting environmental management systems. Ecol Indic 13(1):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. J Policy Anal Manage 24(4):745–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quazi HA, Khoo YK, Tan CM, Wong PS (2001) Motivation for ISO 14000 certification: development of a predictive model. Int J Manage Sci 29(6):525–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridolfi R, Andreis D, Panzieri M, Ceccherini F (2008) The application of environmental certification to the Province of Siena. J Environ Manage 86:390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomone R (2008) Integrated management systems: experiences in Italian organizations. J Clean Prod 16(16):1786–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schylander E, Martinuzzi A (2007) ISO 14001–experiences, effects and future challenges: a national study in Austria. Bus Strat Environ 16(2):133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):936–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Trung DN, Kumar S (2005) Resource use and waste management in Vietnam hotel industry. J Clean Prod 13(2):109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbendesamt (2000) EMAS in Germany, systematic environmental management: report on experience 1995 to 1998. Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock SA, Bodwell C, Graves SR (2003) Responsibility: the new business imperative. Acad Manage Exec 16(2):132–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside G (2000) ISO 14001 auditing manual. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin H, Schmeidler PJ (2009) Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Bus Strat Environ 18(7):469–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zutshi A, Sohal A (2004) Environmental management system adoption by Austalasian organisations: part 1: reasons, benefits and impediments. Technovation 24:335–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Álvarez García .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

García, N.LM., Peris-Ortiz, M., García, J.Á. (2014). Eco-Management and Audit Scheme: Effects on the Profitability of Their Adherence. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J. (eds) Action-Based Quality Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06453-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics